re: Simple solution to judicial overreach and nationwide injunctions

quote:

---

You claimed as a fact (inferred by your arrangement of words) t

---

"Inferred"

I said my fear was they wouldn't form it properly by being too aggressive and not following the normative protocols/procedures. It's tied up in court now due to this.

Had they followed the normative process, these attacks would be without much threat. As I said

quote:

---

I want the replacement to withstand legal challenges by following the proper protocols in formation and administration, so that we don't end up exactly where we're at today. I said this months ago specifically about DOGE.

---

quote:

---

Isn't there a petition or some means available to request SCOTUS hear cases quickly? Like they did with Trump's case?

---

There is. The Supreme Court has what’s called a shadow docket. These are cases where plaintiffs request an expedited review. However, they are rarely granted.

As I recall it, you must request the emergency relief and the justice assigned to that request is the "Circuit Justice" of the Circuit Court of Appeals for that circuit. Every Justice is assigned at least one circuit.


ETA:
For the DC Circuit, the Circuit Justice is John "The Scumbag F*cking Traitor" Roberts. Don’t expect John Roberts to ever give an emergency hearing to anything dealing with the Trump administration – at least where the Trump administration lost at the lower level and is appealing the decision on an expedited basis.

For the First Circuit, the Circuit Justice is Justice Affirmative Action Jackson. This is where the Rhode Island case would need to be appealled to. This is exactly why they went to f*cking Rhode Island of all places to get this restraining order. They know exactly what a complete piece of politicized f*cking filth Ketanji is.

quote:

---

an audit is throwing wrenches into the system?

---

This isn't a normal audit and you know that.

How many audits have randoms on Twitter getting this data to post about prior to the final report? Have you ever seen anything like this done in the history of your life, let alone have it be called an "audit"?

This is ignoring whether or not this "agency" (whatever it is) has the legal authority to do so, and whether or not the individuals involved have the legal authority to do so. Whether proper record keeping is going on. Etc.

quote:

---

Certainly a local judge issuing a sweeping injunction against the Executive Branch w/ no due consideration or hearing is throwing wrenches into the system.

---

It doesn't end there. There will be a trial shortly.

quote:

---

I thought "legal" was the standard for courts.

---

Sure, but novelty creates chaos in courts until they have time to figure it out and create standards for the novelty. It's not going to be solved in 3 days for a legal system of 330M people and multiple layers of review.

The facts of the case are distinguishable you stupid f*ck. When the 14th amendment was being considered, there were statements from one of the parties who wrote the damn amendment that says that this wasn’t going apply to illegals. That was not at issue in the case you cited.

quote:

---

But if you want to stake a claim that if Trump had just formed DOGE "properly" (which you can't seem to define,

---

I did already

quote:

---

My argument has been to avoid EOs entirely and follow the APA or get Congress involve to ensure compliance to eliminate the arguments. That's how you properly form and authorize something like DOGE.

---

LINK

quote:

---

My argument has been to avoid EOs entirely and follow the APA or get Congress involve to ensure compliance to eliminate the arguments.

---

The Chief Executive does not need authority from Congress to audit any department of the Executive branch. It really is that simple. Do you really think Democrats in Congress should have the authority to restrict the Chief Executive from auditing any division of the Executive branch?

Even YOU can’t be THAT F*CKING STUPID.

You do realize that that scumbag f*cking judge has actually banned the Secretary of the Treasury from accessing the Treasury data. So, not only can’t the Chief Executive order an audit of a department of the executive branch, but also the cabinet Secretary in charge of these departments can’t even access the data for which he/she is responsible

I would say you can’t be stupid enough to think that this has any f*cking legitimacy, however, we all know you are that f*cking stupid

quote:

---

This isn't a normal audit and you know that.

How many audits have randoms on Twitter getting this data to post about prior to the final report?

---

Oh, so now that it’s fully f*cking transparent, somehow that makes it illegal.

You really are THAT F*CKING STUPID.

quote:

---

SlowFlowPro

---

Judge Mathis needs you back in the court room.

Dawg, your exact words that I asked the question to were:

quote:

---

I'm not anti-DOGE. I said a long time ago my fear over Trump and DOGE was they'd do what they did last time and be too aggressive ant not follow the law properly and get DOGE tied up. That's literally exactly what happened.

---

You alleged that they didn't follow the laws properly.

Which laws did they not follow properly?

Maybe if you didn't shift focus and directions with your points and presentation, you could keep up with your own BS.