re: Simple solution to judicial overreach and nationwide injunctions

quote:

---

Like taking 4 hours late Friday night to digest a 60 page document? A

---

They forum shopped like the anti-Biden injunctions having similar quick reads in TX. Nobody is disputing that. It doesn't end here, though.

They're going to ultimately have a trial on the merits of this injunction request.

What laws did they “not follow properly”?

quote:

---

If DOGE did anything beyond existing they were always going to tie it up in court.

---

If the proper procedures were followed, this isn't true. Maybe a short-term TRO but they'd withstand the trial phase and operate during the appeals process.

This is the fatalism defense of MAGA failures.

Wong Kim Ark Is easily distinguishable. His parents did not come here illegally with a specific intent of violating our immigration laws. It was a different time and a different place.

Further, because of the Chinese Exclusion Act, his parents were incapable of gaining citizenship. Unless you are some sort of criminal, all of the women now having anchor babies are eligible for citizenship. They just don’t want to wait in f*cking line like everyone else as is required by our immigration laws.

The parents of today’s anchor babies specifically come here in violation of our immigration laws. Many do so specifically to have an anchor baby to get all the f*cking welfare to send back to their home countries. Hell, in China, there is a huge cottage industry where women pay big bucks to fly over here strictly to have their babies.

Are you really stupid enough to believe that this is what the 14th amendment had in mind? Actually, everyone on this board already knows that you are THAT F*CKING STUPID.

Of course, you’re way too f*cking retarded to think beyond the talking points your dear leaders have given you. You really need to stop regurgitating the garbage you hear on Rachel Maddow.

quote:

---

He can't answer that, which is why he's switched to words like "proper" and "normative".

---

Well he needs to be more specific. Is he discussing the formation? I can link the lawsuit for that one if he wants to read the allegations about the formation issues.

And he gives people grief over ad Homs like he doesn’t invite them with his arse-shining antics.

quote:

---

allegations

---

Do not prove anything regarding “not following laws properly”.

I refuse to believe you are this dense.

quote:

---

but if you're intentionally throwing wrenches into the system,

---

an audit is throwing wrenches into the system?

Certainly a local judge issuing a sweeping injunction against the Executive Branch w/ no due consideration or hearing is throwing wrenches into the system. But your reference is to the auditors and gatherers of information?

No. You claimed as a fact (inferred by your arrangement of words) that the Trump team did not follow law properly.

I asked what laws they “did not follow properly”.

It’s a simple question, brother.

Are we going to amend Arts. II and III
of the Constitution? They’ll be quick and easy.??