- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SIAP: Donald Trump Says He Never Swore Oath 'to Support the Constitution'
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:00 pm to teamjackson
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:00 pm to teamjackson
quote:He literally has NO credentials for addressing the US Constitution. At least no more than you'd have addressing Britain's.
Sorry for taking an individuals credentials, that are college educated and vetted
You made a mistake posting the garbage. But it's your defense of it that leaves you looking like a total fool.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:00 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
quote:
If this is his defense, well that says enough already, now doesn't it.....
He literally did not take an oath to support the Constitution.
He’s also not an officer of the United States.
There are several other defenses Trump will have in addition to these two. He has already succeeded in using the latter in court.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:01 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Trump's words about suspending the constitution matter too.
They sure do. You are free to not vote for him because of those words.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment STILL does not apply to POTUS generally or Donald Trump specifically.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:02 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
The Colorado court just ruled that POTUS is not an officer of the United States as contemplated by the 14th this very month.
Dude. A college educated, better journalist says “nuh uh”.
I tried in the third post in this thread to warn him…..he doubled and tripled down. No coming back from that.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:03 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment STILL does not apply to POTUS generally or Donald Trump specifically.
And does that make you sleep easier at night? Knowing you've been duped by a notorious con-man?
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:04 pm to teamjackson
quote:
which is a very gay way to spell that btw
A Democrat using homosexuality as an insult. There is a shock. These bigots show their true colors eventually….every time.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:06 pm to teamjackson
quote:
And you, Mr Bonds, can say without a doubt you have never participated/believed in/fallen for similar projections that were, for a lack of a better word, projected on you via the media??
Nope. I’m sure I have. What is happening in here is you are making a fool of yourself. Just admit you regurgitated an opinion that has been slapped down in court over and over. It’s ok you were ignorant to the facts. What makes you a moron is your inability to admit that and to keep doubling down. You’re all over the place, man. Get ahold of yourself.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:06 pm to teamjackson
quote:
And does that make you sleep easier at night?
Being right certainly brings me pleasure.
quote:
Knowing you've been duped by a notorious con-man?
You’re a moron if you think that applies to me.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Dude. A college educated, better journalist says “nuh uh”.
I tried in the third post in this thread to warn him…..he doubled and tripled down. No coming back from that.
Where's your credentials then? Since we're all acting badasses on a stupid arse LSU forum...
INB4 'I'll have you know I'm a defense attorney for Parish 34 and I'm severely upset I can't prove the election was stolen' .
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:07 pm to teamjackson
quote:
THERE IT IS!!!
Look at the post I’m replying to you stupid idiot.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:07 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
You’re a moron if you think that applies to me
Real talk, I hope you aren't like the other idiots here.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:10 pm to teamjackson
quote:
Where's your credentials then? Since we're all acting badasses on a stupid arse LSU forum...
quote:
INB4 'I'll have you know I'm a defense attorney for Parish 34 and I'm severely upset I can't prove the election was stolen'
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:10 pm to teamjackson
quote:
Since we're all acting badasses on a stupid arse LSU forum...
Absolutely no one thinks youre a badass.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:10 pm to teamjackson
quote:The US Senate reviewed it and disagrees ... That would be ... uhmmm ... in accordance with the Constitution.
you've been duped
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:13 pm to BBONDS25
Would it make you feel better if I told you I made up PARISH 34? The fact you honed in on that one is hilarious 
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Absolutely no one thinks youre a badass.
My mom thinks I am, and that's all I need... After these chicken tendies and sodies of course
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:15 pm to teamjackson
quote:
Would it make you feel better if I told you I made up PARISH 34? The fact you honed in on that one is hilarious
You don’t get it. It just once again shows such a lack of basic legal knowledge. That’s all. I don’t even live in Louisiana and I knew that.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:15 pm to teamjackson
quote:
Where's your credentials then?
Once again, your author literally has NO credentials for addressing the US Constitution. At least no more than you'd have addressing Britain's.
You made a mistake posting the garbage. But it's your defense of it that leaves you looking like a total fool.
An American first grader who watched SchoolHouse Rock on the US Constitution has better credentials than does your author. Certainly, anyone in this thread, including yourself, does.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:17 pm to teamjackson
quote:
Knowing you've been duped by a notorious con-man?
As BONDS said, you are all over the place in this thread. Can you stick to one argument and make a point?
Posted on 11/28/23 at 2:17 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Probably not but this is just a legal argument against an insurrection that does not exist. There was no insurrection
I 100% agree with you but you have to see how this is a bad call politically, right?
Popular
Back to top



0




