Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Should states be allowed to elect all their congressmen at large?

Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:09 pm
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:09 pm
Apparently Virginia used to operate that way.
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9174 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:10 pm to
California and New York should be the only ones voting in all elections and telling everyone else what is best for them.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67959 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:11 pm to
so, everyone is a Senator?
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

California and New York should be the only ones voting in all elections and telling everyone else what is best for them.


Don’t forget Illinois
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36066 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:14 pm to
I would think any state who was a member of the Confederacy would be fighting a decades-long legal battle with the DOJ if they had at-large voting systems.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:16 pm to
I’ll take ways to prove to everyone that I’ve never read the constitution for $500, Alex.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95745 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:19 pm to
No, as the point of districts is to have a representative who belongs to each area.

You do At Large districts in California and you end up with 50 reps split between LA and San Fran with possibly some for San Diego and other associated metro areas. No one covers the sticks.

If Florida did this, the greater Miami area (Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, etc) would be over represented due to frickery by the elections supervisors there while the Panhandle gets fricked.


The only states this MIGHT work in would be 4-5 EV states like Maine or New Hampshire where it’s possible for two individuals to actually represent the whole state.
Posted by TupeloTiger
Tupelo,Ms.[via Bastrop,La.]
Member since Jul 2004
4340 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:22 pm to
This would stop Democratic gerrymandering, which creates Black Districts for Dem's. I know, when I was active, I served on a committee twice that created Black Districts. Of course, I kept telling them this will leave white districts for the GOP leftover. They wanted two Black districts, even if it left 6 white ones.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67959 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:26 pm to
There are some interesting ideas that could replace 'winner take all' distortions, such as ranked choice voting.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27072 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

ranked choice voting


My body is willing.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67959 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

My body is willing.



I'd keep an open mind.

'Winner take all' has certainly distorted the electoral college and is distorting the representative districts.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:51 pm to
Hell no.

Large states include totally different issues.

And Los Angeles county would control all the representatives.

Los Angeles county is 10 million.

Posted by AUX3
Member since Dec 2010
3452 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:57 pm to
Maybe you leave your little progressive ideas at the door.

Our system has worked. I don't know about this penny drive voting process. No names, ID. The idea of dragging people to the polls, filling out their ballots...forcing uninformed dummies to vote is Not good for the country - on either side.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram