Started By
Message

re: Senate stealing from the poor - this should be a crime.

Posted on 12/20/24 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
31256 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

When you work for the government, isn't your employer the taxpayer?

The taxpayers money goes into the general fund

My retirement money goes into the appropriate retirement fund, and is paid out of that same fund. Who I work for has zero to do with my own money withheld for retirement. Because I still am required to pay Federal, state, and local taxes that does not go into my retirement system
Posted by mikie421
continental shelf
Member since Nov 2008
791 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

The federal government needs to spend money to make me more more wealthy.


I don’t look at it that way. From my perspective why should the federal government TAKE from me what I and my employers paid into SS to be different than anyone else.

How exactly is the federal government going to pay me more than the next guy that contributed the same amounts for the same duration?
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
31256 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

So give use your numbers, because you are obviously lying.

There are no numbers dumbass, because the law currently prevents me from filing for my SS retirement. But if it does pass, I will receive roughly 1,800 a month, because that wasnt my main source of income

Theres no why in hell you are paying that much each month into SS, let alone enough in the past to cover me until I die. You would have to be making $30,000 every month to cover that, or $360,000 a year. And if youve been making $360,000 a year since you began working, you wouldnt be pissed at whether SS would be there for you or not
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
3178 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

How exactly is the federal government going to pay me more than the next guy that contributed the same amounts for the same duration?


That's exactly how it works.

Your employer SS tax isn't about you, it's a payroll tax.

The main issue is that you see your SS payments as your money.

It's never been.

It's money that goes into a pot that has defined spending.

That spending is to provide a baseline income to US citizens in their old age.

The first recipients paid nothing in.

It's called social security...

You are secure via a pension, so you don't need as much security.

It's always been that way.

You accepted it.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
3178 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

There are no numbers dumbass, because the law currently prevents me from filing for my SS retirement. But if it does pass, I will receive roughly 1,800 a month, because that wasnt my main source of income


Reading and math problems I see...

What's your pension...

Per month.

That's what I asked, you are refusing to be honest because it would show your greed.
Posted by mikie421
continental shelf
Member since Nov 2008
791 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

You are secure via a pension, so you don't need as much security.


So by that rationale, if someone is secure in retirement via IRA they should get reduced SS? Sounds like you are in favor of means testing.
Posted by JakeRStephenes
Member since Feb 2012
2897 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:10 pm to
Thank you for that explanation
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
20902 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

The taxpayers money goes into the general fund

Yeah, and you're paid from the general fund. You work for the taxpayers. The taxpayers pay you.

But I do get your argument to a point, however - are government pensions negotiated in light of government pension offset of social security?
Posted by mikie421
continental shelf
Member since Nov 2008
791 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:22 pm to
If some teacher goes home at night and makes cutting boards in his shop and on the weekends and all summer, why should he get reduced SS if he is paying into it like his neighbor?
Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2173 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:57 pm to
I retired from state service. I went into the private sector afterwards. I was considered an independent contractor. As a result I paid the employees and owner’s share. In 20 years I paid $300000.00 into the system. How can you claim I haven’t earned my full benefit?
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Member since Sep 2015
1065 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Thank you for that explanation


Lot of good it's doing. They rather just jerk each other off about how they aren't getting what they "deserve".
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
3178 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

How can you claim I haven’t earned my full benefit?


I appreciate you providing numbers, what I object to is people being two faced on this.

The same people who are claiming that they are rich AF bigrollers who worked two lucrative jobs, are then throwing a fit that they won't get $2k a month.

But no one has provided full numbers.

Govt Pensions are calculated knowing that the workers will also be paying into SS.

So here is my question,

When you look at your pension and how much you paid into it and into SS, how does it compare with the rate of return of a non govt worker gets from just SS.

Aka if a regular worker works 45 years (20-65), and pays in full rate, then gets paid back for 15 years in SS checks, how does that compare to you paying into both SS(employee only, employer is a separate topic) and into your pension, and only getting the pension (which could be much higher than SS)
Posted by Veritas
Raleigh, NC
Member since Feb 2005
8856 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:08 pm to
Can I get the money that I have had to give to give to social security and invest it myself?
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
3178 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

how they aren't getting what they "deserve".


Yup, it's not clear, they could be paying less and getting more or visa versa.

But from your explanation and their lack of transparency I feel that they know they are getting a good deal already (I mean they did agree with it to begin with).

If they were getting less, (aka I paid in $400,000 and I will only break even if I live to 110) They would be telling us all the details.
They aren't.

And they wonder why govt workers get a bad rap.
Posted by Veritas
Raleigh, NC
Member since Feb 2005
8856 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Don't do some "its my money I would have invested in NVIDIA BS"


Social security is a fraudulent scheme. No one should have to be required to give to it. If you don’t contribute you don’t get it.

See how long it survives.
Posted by Veritas
Raleigh, NC
Member since Feb 2005
8856 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:21 pm to
Also if you are counting on social security while they continue to raise the retirement age you are fricked.

Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2173 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:33 pm to
I do not have the numbers you ask for. However, had I been given the opportunity to pay $300k into my SEP instead of SS, I can assure you I would choose an investment account every time. I can also state that I entered state service before these provisions were added. I had no choice in the matter.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
3178 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

I do not have the numbers you ask for. However, had I been given the opportunity to pay $300k into my SEP instead of SS, I can assure you I would choose an investment account every time. I can also state that I entered state service before these provisions were added. I had no choice in the matter.


None of us had a choice.

I don't get the portion my employer pays in the fact that you personally had to pay it is no different than my employer paying it before its handed to me.
Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2173 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 6:22 pm to
My point is I paid more personally in 20 years than many workers paid in 45 years including the employer portion. The entire situation is a cluster frick.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
3178 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

45 years including the employer portion.


Everyone has the employer portion paid.

It doesnt matter if your employer takes it out first or not.

In either case the money disappears, either before the employee sees it or after.

Everyone else paid the employer portion too, you think that companies paid that out of the goodness of their hearts?

So you paid half of that, or other workers paid 2x that.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram