Second Judge doesn't know the Constitution

This makes no sense.

It was constitutional for one President to establish DACA, but it's unconstitutional for a different President to get rid of it?

This is so weird,

Judges supporting unconstitutional acts.

They really are dictators in black robes with no respect for the rule of law.

To be fair, injunctions are often granted if the outcome is not easily “fixed”.

So, I can see why not allowing a deportation while that issue is before the Supreme Court is defensible.

You can’t easily undo the deed in the event that the decision goes the other way.

I don’t LIKE it. I do understand why it might happen. Just trying to be reasonable with the understanding.

I have no idea. This one did not.

This judge only said Sessions erred when he said DACA was unconstitutional.

Neither judge has said that.

First judge: DACA has to stay in place while litigation is ongoing. See my first post. This injunction is very common.

Second judge: Sessions is incorrect when he said DACA is unconstitutional


That is ALL that has happened. Really not an affront to American justice or Constitution.

ETA: I expect Trump to prevail in court and I think that is the right decision. But, I am not upset at the process.

Who give a shite if it is or it isn't?

It's a fricking Executive Order that can be reversed with the stroke of a fricking pen.

too bad the Constitution isn't made of whatever kind of paper produces the most paper cuts - at least then the leftists would get their asses torn up as they wipe their asses with it

quote:

---

SCOTUS will just have to spank some more judges. If there were any real justice these people would all be removed, because the rule of law has nothing to do with how they rule.

---

More federal judges need to be impeached, this judicial activism and, in some cases, open defiance of SCOTUS precedent is simply ridiculous. Pragmatism and common sense should always prevail idc who TF you are.