Started By
Message

re: SDNY fricking with DOGE ALSO

Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by SemiNoblePursuit
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2016
2150 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:01 pm to
“Policy agenda”

Granting unfettered access to confidential government information to Elon and his merry band of dorks is not a legal “policy agenda”

Anyone who makes your fuhrer’s job more difficult is the bad guy though
Posted by BlueTiger23
Member since Dec 2020
450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:01 pm to
Ok
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Anyone who makes your fuhrer’s job more difficult is the bad guy though

Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
9648 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Did your pussy hurt this much when Biden kept forgiving student loans after the f*cking SUPREME COURT told him to stop?


Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135576 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Then what’s the point of the Constitution or checks and balances?
It's a question I ask every time a regional judge issues a nationwide injunction.
Posted by BlueTiger23
Member since Dec 2020
450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:08 pm to
Most of the nominees were announced almost 2 months ago which means the process and discussions to pick them were even further ahead. Do what you will with those timetables.

You also clearly didn’t get why I used all caps. Let me say it slow. It is of much more importance for someone who is running an entire agency of the most powerful country of the world to get that security clearance (even though they’ve been more than likely vetted already) than some college student at a start up government agency that is now in the courts. You’re talking about “weeks”, when the lowest of staff was getting announced in mid December 2 months ago. We’ve known the heads of agencies like 3 months ago outside of Bondi (because it was originally Gaetz). DOGE was announced 3 months ago, that process could’ve been taken forth that way we wouldn’t even be talking about this
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

You’re crazy if you think a former president wouldn’t be able to file a lawsuit over security clearance and intelligence briefings being revoke on that claim
Under what standing?
Posted by BlueTiger23
Member since Dec 2020
450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:09 pm to
Presidential appointees. Very interesting set up nonetheless
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:11 pm to
So then that process used to vet those guys weren't busy and could Knock out 4-5 more in no time.

Unless you are suggesting those names weren't supplied on day one?

Posted by BlueTiger23
Member since Dec 2020
450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:12 pm to
NATIONAL SECURITY. Again we are talking about political semantics as mentioned in the previous response. That’s what all of this is atp
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112547 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

You’re crazy if you think a former president wouldn’t be able to file a lawsuit over security clearance and intelligence briefings being revoke on that claim.


Please tell me you are not serious.

Trump could not assert Executive Privilege absent Biden backing that claim since he was no longer president. Former presidents have no RIGHT to a security clearance.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

DOGE was announced 3 months ago, that process could’ve been taken forth that way we wouldn’t even be talking about this
Correct, so you are saying the names weren't on the list the transition team supplies for vetting?
That's you fricking gotcha?
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16449 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

your fuhrer
unhinged bedwetting libtard melt
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

NATIONAL SECURITY.
SO!!!!
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
18968 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:16 pm to
There needs to be consequences for these overreaching activists judges. When they are overruled they should be hit with massive fines
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12118 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Paul Engelmayer


Looks like he never met a penis he didn't like
Posted by BlueTiger23
Member since Dec 2020
450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:16 pm to
If they were, it wouldn’t have been any issue to get them through versus what we are seeing now. They’re the only ones having the issues. The heads are pushing thru even the Secretary of Treasury. It’s a new agency so it isn’t a foreign concept that they’re operating on the fly
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62645 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Then what’s the point of the Constitution or checks and balances? Some of you sound very un-American


You dumb.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84450 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

what we are seeing
Dip shits howling?

quote:

’s a new agency so it isn’t a foreign concept that they’re operating on the fly


jWhy would a new agency matter?

Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39540 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Then what’s the point of the Constitution or checks and balances? Some of you sound very un-American


Got to act unAmerican to save America from enemies of the people? Blame the left for pushing so hard. This is the punch back.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram