- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SDNY fricking with DOGE ALSO
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:01 pm to the808bass
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:01 pm to the808bass
“Policy agenda”
Granting unfettered access to confidential government information to Elon and his merry band of dorks is not a legal “policy agenda”
Anyone who makes your fuhrer’s job more difficult is the bad guy though
Granting unfettered access to confidential government information to Elon and his merry band of dorks is not a legal “policy agenda”
Anyone who makes your fuhrer’s job more difficult is the bad guy though
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:02 pm to SemiNoblePursuit
quote:
Anyone who makes your fuhrer’s job more difficult is the bad guy though
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:04 pm to MMauler
quote:
Did your pussy hurt this much when Biden kept forgiving student loans after the f*cking SUPREME COURT told him to stop?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:07 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:It's a question I ask every time a regional judge issues a nationwide injunction.
Then what’s the point of the Constitution or checks and balances?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:08 pm to Jbird
Most of the nominees were announced almost 2 months ago which means the process and discussions to pick them were even further ahead. Do what you will with those timetables.
You also clearly didn’t get why I used all caps. Let me say it slow. It is of much more importance for someone who is running an entire agency of the most powerful country of the world to get that security clearance (even though they’ve been more than likely vetted already) than some college student at a start up government agency that is now in the courts. You’re talking about “weeks”, when the lowest of staff was getting announced in mid December 2 months ago. We’ve known the heads of agencies like 3 months ago outside of Bondi (because it was originally Gaetz). DOGE was announced 3 months ago, that process could’ve been taken forth that way we wouldn’t even be talking about this
You also clearly didn’t get why I used all caps. Let me say it slow. It is of much more importance for someone who is running an entire agency of the most powerful country of the world to get that security clearance (even though they’ve been more than likely vetted already) than some college student at a start up government agency that is now in the courts. You’re talking about “weeks”, when the lowest of staff was getting announced in mid December 2 months ago. We’ve known the heads of agencies like 3 months ago outside of Bondi (because it was originally Gaetz). DOGE was announced 3 months ago, that process could’ve been taken forth that way we wouldn’t even be talking about this
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:08 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:Under what standing?
You’re crazy if you think a former president wouldn’t be able to file a lawsuit over security clearance and intelligence briefings being revoke on that claim
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:09 pm to NC_Tigah
Presidential appointees. Very interesting set up nonetheless
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:11 pm to BlueTiger23
So then that process used to vet those guys weren't busy and could Knock out 4-5 more in no time.
Unless you are suggesting those names weren't supplied on day one?
Unless you are suggesting those names weren't supplied on day one?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:12 pm to Jbird
NATIONAL SECURITY. Again we are talking about political semantics as mentioned in the previous response. That’s what all of this is atp
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:12 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:
You’re crazy if you think a former president wouldn’t be able to file a lawsuit over security clearance and intelligence briefings being revoke on that claim.
Please tell me you are not serious.
Trump could not assert Executive Privilege absent Biden backing that claim since he was no longer president. Former presidents have no RIGHT to a security clearance.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:13 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:Correct, so you are saying the names weren't on the list the transition team supplies for vetting?
DOGE was announced 3 months ago, that process could’ve been taken forth that way we wouldn’t even be talking about this
That's you fricking gotcha?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:13 pm to SemiNoblePursuit
quote:unhinged bedwetting libtard melt
your fuhrer
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:15 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:SO!!!!
NATIONAL SECURITY.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:16 pm to udtiger
There needs to be consequences for these overreaching activists judges. When they are overruled they should be hit with massive fines
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:16 pm to MMauler
quote:
Paul Engelmayer
Looks like he never met a penis he didn't like
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:16 pm to Jbird
If they were, it wouldn’t have been any issue to get them through versus what we are seeing now. They’re the only ones having the issues. The heads are pushing thru even the Secretary of Treasury. It’s a new agency so it isn’t a foreign concept that they’re operating on the fly
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:17 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:
Then what’s the point of the Constitution or checks and balances? Some of you sound very un-American
You dumb.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:18 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:Dip shits howling?
what we are seeing
quote:
’s a new agency so it isn’t a foreign concept that they’re operating on the fly
jWhy would a new agency matter?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 12:18 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:
Then what’s the point of the Constitution or checks and balances? Some of you sound very un-American
Got to act unAmerican to save America from enemies of the people? Blame the left for pushing so hard. This is the punch back.
Popular
Back to top


2






