re: SCOTUS Roberts now has authority to appoint new Judges to SCOTUS under AG Garland rule.

quote:

---

Except the Chief Justice never has had the power to appoint anyone as an inferior justice.

---

The USSC has original jurisdiction over suits between two or more states , the CJ will appoint a special master to hear the case instead of the court sitting en banc to hear the case. Also while the CJ is not involved The Courts Of Appeal appoint all Bankruptcy Judges according to statute.

quote:

---

the CJ will appoint a special master to hear the case instead of the court sitting en banc to hear the case

---

Can you cite me the example of this happening?

quote:

---

Also while the CJ is not involved

---

Then it's irrelevant

quote:

---

Of course this stupidity was written by Julie Kelly

---

Wrong. You know better than a criminal defense attorney that wrote the article? Please explain.

quote:

---

This is a guest post by David W. Fischer, a Maryland and D.C.-based criminal defense attorney and the senior partner at Fischer & Putzi, P.A. Most recently, Fischer defended January 6 defendant Thomas Caldwell, who was acquitted on seditious and other conspiracy charges.

---

Instead, you took the lowly trolling role of what Weissmann and democrats do to Julie Kelly-criticize...Are you in line with that poser shipwreckedcrew, a fed who moled his way into defending J6 people and the defendant's said he did not help them?

What kind of a top dog fed attorney spends his time telling Julie Kelly, investigative reporter, how stupid she is? This is petty and plainly stupid.

Have you addressed that Jack Smith came from the ICC, AKA The Hague.

The ICC isn't even recognized by the USA because there is a huge sovereignty issue.

He was most likely a good fit at the Hague because the SCOTUS cited him for gross prosecutorial misconduct.

quote:

---

Among his most notable corruption cases, Smith – who was tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland – was overturned unanimously in the Supreme Court.

Smith prosecuted the former Republican governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell. The U.S. Supreme Court later overturned the case in a unanimous 8-0 decision. The Court observed that “there is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”

The Supreme Court also rebuked Smith and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.”

Smith also prosecuted Arizona Congressman Rick Renzi – a Republican – on corruption charges, which the Supreme Court upheld. Trump later pardoned Renzi. The Republican claimed he had been “wrongly convicted by a Department of Justice that engaged in witness tampering, illegal wiretapping, and gross prosecutorial misconduct.”

“He’s destroyed a lot of lives. Lives have been destroyed. He’s destroyed people—he’s destroyed lives,” Trump said of Smith. "He was Lois Lerner and the IRS case, which was one of the most egregious abuses what happened. The government had to apologize to people."

Trump condemned Smith for going after Christians and Republicans, calling him “deranged.” He said the special counsel had abused his power and that history would look upon this moment, saying it would be remembered as an “embarrassment” for the entire nation.

---

quote:

---

Wrong. You know better than a criminal defense attorney that wrote the article? Please explain.

---

She's a grifter and her twitter is just one example of dishonesty after another.

She's the current queen of only posting snippets of rulings and not describing the full context, then planting a flag based on the curated snippet (which is often wrong in the larger context).

quote:

---

Have you addressed that Jack Smith came from the ICC, AKA The Hague.

---

What does that have to do with a discussion about the legality of his appointment?

quote:

---

He was most likely a good fit at the Hague because the SCOTUS cited him for gross prosecutorial misconduct.

---

Again, what does this have to do with his appointment?

I'm not exactly a Jack Smith fan, but I also understand that's wholly irrelevant to this thread and the incomprehensibly stupid "arguments" in the article in OP.

quote:

---

How else can you judge the opinion if you have no basis from which to judge the opinion?

---

Irrational argument is impossible to track by definition of irrational.

edit, I just saw you posted above

quote:

---

Not at all.

---

No he's right.

quote:

---

If your argument is that the underlying system has no value, then any opinion associated with that system has no value.

---

That is the opinion of that system. And he is right. They are letting criminals off while prosecuting people for political gain.

quote:

---

Florida v Georgia 22o142
docket

---

Was that done via inherent Constitutional authority or via Rule 53?

quote:

---

This is stupid even for the new left wing race baiting irrational sfp.

---

It really is. I don't see all of his posts, but the majority that I do see is him exposing himself and a left-wing person. He tries to sell the board that he is not, but he can not help but to revert back to it.

In this thread, he just slammed Judge Cannon while defending the leftist talking points.

quote:

---

quote:
I can respect the law and have no respect for the system that is charged with administering it.


Then you're creating a moving target, which I predicted, and I cut it off before you could rely on the dishonest rhetoric.

---

No little socialist. He can respect law and understand that the courts DO NOT.