- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Justice Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing In Game Thread
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:34 am to When in Rome
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:34 am to When in Rome
Didn't Leahy try this crap yesterday?
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:34 am to CoachChappy
Yes, but now he can point to actual emails that he had declassified overnight.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:34 am to CoachChappy
I can’t understand Leahy over his death rattle
ETA: why is he hung up on this email about “stolen talking points” that was sent to Kavanaugh 15 years ago? And why is it relevant
ETA: why is he hung up on this email about “stolen talking points” that was sent to Kavanaugh 15 years ago? And why is it relevant
This post was edited on 9/6/18 at 10:36 am
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:36 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
Leahy really tried to set up a gotcha trap with a single random email from 16 years ago? Is this the best they have?
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:36 am to When in Rome
What is Leahy expecting to get out of this questioning? This doesn't seem unusual to me at all.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:37 am to imjustafatkid
In 2004 Hillary was against gay marriage during a debate.. A lot can change in 15 years!
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:39 am to When in Rome
Can Leahy get off his stolen email, he has been on this for 13 years now, let it go Pat, just let it go.....
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:39 am to gobuxgo5
I'm just going to go back and listen to the Republican portions. The Democrats aren't asking anything of substance.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:40 am to When in Rome
Is Leahy really trying to find a smoking gun over common inner-office emails?
Leahy knows damned well the emails while Kav worked for W Bush is covered under executive privileage. He is also blaming Trump it is ridiculous.
Leahy knows damned well the emails while Kav worked for W Bush is covered under executive privileage. He is also blaming Trump it is ridiculous.
This post was edited on 9/6/18 at 10:40 am
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:40 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
This question couldn’t be less dishonest. Is Senator Leahy, a guy who’s been on the hill for basically half a century, really going to say that receiving “stolen talking points” from a staffer would raise a red flag for him?
As if congressional staffs don’t share information or leak like a colander?
These people live in quite a bubble. Vermont must be a weird place full of weird people.
ETA: now that I think about it, the early 2000’s are probably the latest period that Leahy has coherent recollection from. That would explain his obsession over nonsense from 2002 that doesn’t appear relevant in any way to these hearings.
As if congressional staffs don’t share information or leak like a colander?
These people live in quite a bubble. Vermont must be a weird place full of weird people.
ETA: now that I think about it, the early 2000’s are probably the latest period that Leahy has coherent recollection from. That would explain his obsession over nonsense from 2002 that doesn’t appear relevant in any way to these hearings.
This post was edited on 9/6/18 at 10:43 am
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:41 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
wtf did Leahy just say about beastilality pedophilia?
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:44 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
Is Senator Leahy, a guy who’s been on the hill for basically half a century, really going to say that receiving “stolen talking points” from a staffer would raise a red flag for him?
He's taking it personal and it doesn't have anything to do with this confirmation. It's annoying.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:44 am to cajunangelle
Is there a law stating Booker now has to be impeached?
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:46 am to cajunangelle
Is Leahy now in favor of beastiality and pedophelia? Sounds like he may be.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:46 am to cajunangelle
Kav: “you asked if it raised a red flag, no it did not”
Leahy, clearly wanting a different answer: (sighs), (remembers to look down at his notes so he can figure out what day it is and who these men in suits are around him), “something something Roe v Wade?”
Leahy, clearly wanting a different answer: (sighs), (remembers to look down at his notes so he can figure out what day it is and who these men in suits are around him), “something something Roe v Wade?”
This post was edited on 9/6/18 at 10:48 am
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:48 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
I'VE BEEN HERE 43 YEARS!
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:49 am to TigerBait1971
quote:
I'VE BEEN HERE 43 YEARS!
It would make my day if someone would respond with “my point exactly, Senator”
Posted on 9/6/18 at 10:55 am to TigerBait1971
Senator Graham is doing a good job here.
Now I’ll go wash my hands
Now I’ll go wash my hands
Posted on 9/6/18 at 11:13 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
Senator Graham is doing a good job here.
He is another one who is great in these committee hearings.
He just needs to shut the frick up the rest of the time. These people are all glamour hogs. They want to be on screen and in the headlines in an effort to get reelected. It's sickening.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 11:14 am to When in Rome
Shirley his base is a couple thousand people
Popular
Back to top
