- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scariest part of KR trial is
Posted on 11/20/21 at 4:23 pm to beachdude
Posted on 11/20/21 at 4:23 pm to beachdude
quote:
Prosecutors primary responsibility is to the cause of justice, to see that justice is done. While their job entails investigation, filing charges and ultimately trying a criminal defendant and dealing with police, detectives, and judges, they don’t “represent” these elements. A prosecutor (in the interests of justice) is not to hide facts that if known would be useful in ascertaining the truth. Likewise, a prosecutor should not bring a case that on its face is contrary to the facts and law just to take a chance at a conviction. Presumably, they are taught this in law school and are so informed when they join the local district attorney’s office. However, due to ignorance , politics, local practices, and plain old malevolence, their prime duty to Justice is ignored.
0
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:03 pm to charbar203
quote:
inserted his fingers into her vagina, sniffed them and said "you smell like youve been with other men".
Jacob Blake sounds like he is on the down low, if you ask me.
Carry on ……….
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:13 pm to dafif
Get off? They’re gonna get a political appointment or run for higher office and win. What they did in that trial was pander for the networks to ignite the militias and radicals. They knew they weren’t winning the case and that was never the point.
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:18 pm to Madking
I think they genuinely believed that the jury would convict out of fear for themselves personally (and their families) as well as concern for their community. Turns out some folks aren't afraid to do the right thing, even in the face of potential fear. And as per usual, the left and their attack dog prosecutor were wrong.
This post was edited on 11/20/21 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:20 pm to dafif
Pretty sure there will be multiple bar complaints (mine being one of them).
Hell, the judge has an affirmative duty to report them.
Hell, the judge has an affirmative duty to report them.
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:21 pm to davyjones
I think a conviction for them would’ve just been the cherry on top but I don’t think it was their realistic aim. What they risked with all of the misconduct they participated in was an attempt to cause problems outside the courtroom and throw out red meat for the Democrats. I don’t believe winning was the ultimate goal.
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:35 pm to dafif
Add Grossarm to the mix, he should be charged as well.
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:37 pm to Madking
It's plausible, your take. No doubt. I think whatever the plan or goal was, it was ill-conceived or misimplemented or likely both. Their own following appears to be losing faith in them at an increasing clip.
This post was edited on 11/20/21 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 11/20/21 at 5:39 pm to dafif
quote:Disagree. The entire premise of the charges was so ridiculous that F. Lee Bailey would have looked like a fool trying to make it stick. This is a huge pushback against the irrational insanity that has gripped the country. This will come to be known as "The Big Pivot".
That the prosecutors will probably get off Scott free and their behavior is probably more the norm than an aberration around the country
Their behavior was sickening and they should be sanction and, again, prosecutors around the country behave this way to the detriment of everybody
Posted on 11/20/21 at 8:45 pm to udtiger
quote:
Pretty sure there will be multiple bar complaints (mine being one of them).
How do you get to file a bar complaint?
Posted on 11/20/21 at 8:46 pm to tigerpawl
quote:
ry. This will come to be known as "The Big Pivot".
Fingers crossed you are right
Posted on 11/20/21 at 10:32 pm to Plx1776
quote:
Motherfrickers didn't even bother investigating anyone else who was involved. Literally went out of their way to not look deeper into huber or Rosenbaum.
And, if they would have looked deeper into huber and Rosenbaum, what would they have found and what good would it have done them at trial?
Posted on 11/22/21 at 1:18 pm to texridder
You mean the guy illegally carrying a firearm? That guy. I swear every time you post you embarrass TCU
This post was edited on 11/22/21 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 11/22/21 at 1:24 pm to dafif
Nah. The scariest part is that it even went to trial.
Posted on 11/22/21 at 8:59 pm to dafif
quote:
You mean the guy illegally carrying a firearm?
So explain to me what difference it made to Rittenhouse’s defense of self defense if Grosskreutz was legally or illegally carrying a firearm.
Posted on 11/23/21 at 10:12 am to texridder
Honest to god, trying to discuss anything with you is like talking to a 3 year old. You asked one question and then moved to something else.
An investigation by the prosecutor into those men might have given a background into their thought process and active crimes and , along with attacking KR might have given them pause to prosecute
An investigation by the prosecutor into those men might have given a background into their thought process and active crimes and , along with attacking KR might have given them pause to prosecute
Posted on 11/23/21 at 10:22 am to dafif
Attorneys are only going to get worse in the future:
'The defendant is guilty.
Just look at him.
The prosecution rests.'
'The defendant is guilty.
Just look at him.
The prosecution rests.'
Posted on 11/23/21 at 3:43 pm to dafif
quote:
An investigation by the prosecutor into those men might have given a background into their thought process and active crimes and , along with attacking KR might have given them pause to prosecute
None of that is relevant to Rittenhouse’s claim of self defense, which is determined by whether he reasonably thought he was at risk of serious bodily harm at the time of each incident.
If they threatened him that night, that would be relevant because it could have contributed to Rittenhouse’s state of mind.
What they did or didn't do prior to that night (which would be unknown to Rittenouse) is irrelevant.
It's hard to believe you can't appreciate that. Only a complete air-head would continue to misunderstand that.
Posted on 11/23/21 at 4:36 pm to texridder
First, idiot, that is not what you wrote.
Second, as a prosecutor, what the victim were doing and their background may factor into whether to charge given the video
Second, as a prosecutor, what the victim were doing and their background may factor into whether to charge given the video
Posted on 11/23/21 at 5:00 pm to dafif
Who prosecutes the prosecutors
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News