Started By
Message

re: Say what you want, but this is hilariously ironic.

Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:27 pm to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:27 pm to
quote:


How about in my lifetime, let’s get the FBI’s definition of mass murder to zero. If we can do that, I’ll consider it a success

I don't even understand what that means. So you want them to consider any shooting to be a mass murderer
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Your gif does not adequately reflect the downvotes to which you are entitled with your dullard reasoning


I always enjoy the fools that want to act like they are above it all by PARTICIPATING in that which they turn their nose up at.

Hello fellow dullard.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:29 pm to
For frick’s sakes, and you call me disingenuous and act like I won’t be open.

I’ll stop calling for gun laws when we no longer have any more mass murder in this country as defined by the FBI (no more incidents in one place where four or more people are killed).

If you can’t get there with me, and you can’t go along with screening out those proven to mentally unstable, then this was never a me issue.
Posted by BaylorTiger
Member since Nov 2006
2083 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

No, it's serious when more than 50% of the people in here


OH $&%#...just got back from a 2 hour lunch and this guy is back at it crunching the numbers again!!! Solid math skills sir.

Just getting trolled until 5PM or are you taking this full time into the weekend?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:35 pm to
quote:


For frick’s sakes, and you call me disingenuous and act like I won’t be open


Dude. 2 people couldn't understand. Clarify.

quote:


I’ll stop calling for gun laws when we no longer have any more mass murder in this country as defined by the FBI (no more incidents in one place where four or more people are killed)

I already know this.

Hence, you will never stop

Hence, there's no sense for people like me to negotiate.

This isn't a gotcha. I'm being straight. The fact you won't stop is why we won't listen.

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:37 pm to
quote:



If you can’t get there with me, and you can’t go along with screening out those proven to mentally unstable


I already said i supported this
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:38 pm to
And there is complete disingenuity on your part. I just said that was a good place to stop for me, and you hedged like crazy.

Good to know you want capitulation without being willing to find any sensible place in the middle.
Posted by bigbowe80
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
3767 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:48 pm to
quote:



And how were they mitigated prior to guns?

You are literally asserting the ONLY way for someone to defend themselves from your strawman of the hoards of mass beatings that people are subjected to are guns.

The ONLY way...a gun. Think about that.


Um prior to guns a lot of good innocent people were not able to defend themselves as efficiently as they were after guns were invented? This reminds me, earlier this week someone leaked a report from the CDC showing the actual numbers of those who used a gun to defend themselves from an attack. The results actually backed up the Gary Kleck's surveys that liberals have been dismissing for years. That's right, it wasn't the NRA, it wasn't some right- wing lobby or publication, it was the CDC who of course tried to hide the findings for years.

LINK
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 3:51 pm
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58520 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

LESS THAN FOUR PEOPLE DEAD IN ONE PLACE AND ONE INCIDENT. frickING READ!



OMG DAVID!!!!

I did read, you used the word "one" twice and i dont read that anywhere in your statemment.

So you really dont know what you are talking about.
quote:

How about in my lifetime, let’s get the FBI’s definition of mass murder to zero. If we can do that, I’ll consider it a success.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19568 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

For frick’s sakes, and you call me disingenuous and act like I won’t be open.


You are too stupid and too poorly educated on this topic to claim you can "be open".

quote:

I’ll stop calling for gun laws when we no longer have any more mass murder in this country as defined by the FBI (no more incidents in one place where four or more people are killed).


There's absolutely no way that will ever happen. You know that's impossible which is why you are a disingenuous piece of trash.

quote:

then this was never a me issue.


You are a complete moron, that is purely your issue.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:


And there is complete disingenuity on your part. I just said that was a good place to stop for me, and you hedged like crazy


You said you want to stop when you achieve zero mass shootings

You've literally given like 5 stopping places

quote:


Good to know you want capitulation without being willing to find any sensible place in the middle

I ask for nothing. I just expect to know what I'm negotiating against
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

There's absolutely no way that will ever happen. You know that's impossible which is why you are a disingenuous piece of trash


Fair enough, then I want all of your guns. Every last one. I’ll make sure to start supporting candidates who want the same.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

You've literally given like 5 stopping places


No, I haven’t. I’ve given two, and you don’t want either. So there is no middle ground.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:14 pm to
quote:


No, I haven’t. I’ve given two, and you don’t want either. So there is no middle ground

You gave one.

When i asked if you'd stop there if more shootings happened, you said no

Hence. It wasn't a stopping place
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 4:16 pm
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:15 pm to
No, I didn’t. You need to go back and read and show me where I said that.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:19 pm to
quote:


No, I didn’t. You need to go back and read and show me where I said that


So okay. To clarify. If you got definitive legislation that you were satisfied with regarding mental health and gun ownership and after getting that legislation more shootings occurred you are telling me that you can guarantee me you wouldn't then ask for more legislation? And I'm not referring to your earlier request for every swinging dick to go get a mental health evaluation if they want to buy a gun. I am referring to your desire to flag anyone with significant mental health issues and ban them from guns

That's not a complicated question and can be answered within simple yes or no if you like
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
13103 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:23 pm to


CollegeFBRules:

Yes you know you have been a bad boy and this will hurt you more than it hurts me..



Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

To clarify. If you got definitive legislation that you were satisfied with regarding mental health and gun ownership


I get to set those standards?

Yes.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:25 pm to
quote:


I get to set those standards

Define the standards because i want to clarify that i understood them correctly

I only ask because that way i can specifically say if i would agree with them
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 4:28 pm
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25726 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 4:28 pm to
See, you said if I got definitive legislation I was satisfied with it was a simple yes or no. I said yes based on that and now we are like, “Well, hold on.”

I’ll tell you what, I’ll honestly give some time to thinking about what I consider meaningful and I’ll post it on here. Hell, I’m willing to email each other off of here and discuss it. Either way, I’ll give honest thought to that and answer your question.
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram