- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rudy Giuliani found liable for defaming GA election workers, has to pay damages.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:50 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:50 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I was basing those statements off of what TigerDoc posted.
Jesus frick:
When you're proven wrong and theirs no denying, you deny what you've said.
1
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Barry is usually not like that, in my experience. Seems like he has gone off the reservation a bit in the last week or so. I hope he is OK.
thanks for your concern. I assure you I’m fine. I was guilty of not reading all of the pleadings and basing my statements off of a post from TigerDoc. Cwill is just weirdly reactive to my posts. Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:51 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Thanks. Not sure what the uproar about the motion to compel is, then. If he admits to the allegations why was the judge compelling production?
Wow. Just take a little time to read the ruling before your next comment.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:53 pm to cwill
quote:
Jesus frick:
That was my post at 1:44 pm. Now go look at my post IN RESPONSE TO TIGERDOC at 1:31. You utter and complete moron.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:53 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I was guilty of not reading all of the pleadings and basing my statements off of a post from TigerDoc.
You weren't basing it off Hanks very specific post? You seemed very certain in your retort to him.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:53 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Wow. Just take a little time to read the ruling before you next comment.
The 56 page ruling? I think I’ll pass. This is a fricking message board not a hearing.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
They sure took to the charge with nothing in hand... out of character.
In character if its all an act to effectuate a grift for money
Not at the cost of your career and reputation.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:54 pm to cwill
quote:
You weren't basing it off Hanks very specific post? You seemed very certain in your retort to him.
Look up one post, dummy.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:54 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
That was my post at 1:44 pm. Now go look at my post IN RESPONSE TO TIGERDOC at 1:31. You utter and complete moron.
Dude, this is sad.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:55 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
... this is the first case on the "stolen" 2020 election to supposedly have evidence presented ...
This could have been a step to force the court to acknowledge that the 2020 election was not stolen ...
That is what they are doing, just like having that Hunter Biden case before the judge in Delaware. That judge was supposed to give Hunter full immunity. PERIOD
even if it is a pack of lies
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:56 pm to cwill
quote:
Dude, this is sad.
It really is. I read what TigerDoc posted. In that post there was no admission of defamation. I pointed that out to several posters. You then pointed out he did admit to defamation per se in a different statement. I thank you and asked why the motion to compel was still a thing. And you completely melted down. You’re a weird dude.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:57 pm to BBONDS25
You're just bad faith all the way down BBOND Ramaswamy. Good luck with all that. 
Posted on 8/30/23 at 2:58 pm to cwill
quote:
You're just bad faith all the way down BBOND Ramaswamy. Good luck with all that.
Calm down Frances. This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 8/30/23 at 3:04 pm to supatigah
Posted on 8/30/23 at 3:07 pm to cwill
(no message)
Posted on 8/30/23 at 3:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:You just seem to be a bit "off" lately.
I hope he is OK.quote:
thanks for your concern
quote:It was the second or third time this week that you took that tone toward objectively-correct assertions, and your "reeeeeeeee" posts were just TOTALLY out of character. You are usually more objective, and you certainly don't get snippy with people for NOT getting emotional.
Basically, he is admitting that he is lying PoS who defamed these two women, but asserting that the Constitution ALLOWS him to be a lying PoS.quote:
That isn’t what happened at all, Hank. Admitting making the statements is not admitting they were faso (false?) statements. Good Lord.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 8/30/23 at 3:11 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Not what happened. He admitted to making the statements. He argued that those admissions made production moot. The judge disagreed and instead of ordering production she issued a default judgment.
Gotcha. Thanks for clearing it up. Hard to keep track of all this. It’s a full time job in itself.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 3:15 pm to AggieHank86
As an aside... am I the only one that is just amazed and confounded that Rudy and Sydney, whom I felt were both excellent lawyers, have ended up here.
I'm having a hard tim imagining any board "lawyers" risking their licenses and credibility with the statements made.
I'm having a hard tim imagining any board "lawyers" risking their licenses and credibility with the statements made.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 3:15 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 8/30/23 at 3:15 pm to TerryDawg03
quote:
Gotcha. Thanks for clearing it up. Hard to keep track of all this. It’s a full time job in itself.
agreed. It was further cleared up for me. He did admit to defamation per se. Which is why I’m confused why the motion to compel was still a thing. If he admitted to all of the allegations, why the motion to compel?
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News