- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Roe v Wade: Does is it Actually Legalize Abortion Explicitly or Just Dr/Patient Privacy
Posted on 7/1/18 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 7/1/18 at 5:02 pm
What was the actual Roe v Wade decision? Was it that abortion is completely legal or is it more around what happens between a doctor and patient is private?
Posted on 7/1/18 at 5:17 pm to STEVED00
As I understand it, the latter.
You can’t prohibit an abortion about due process, and due process violates doctor/patent confidentiality.
You can’t prohibit an abortion about due process, and due process violates doctor/patent confidentiality.
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:38 pm to Volvagia
Wouldn’t this legalize any and every procedure a doctor and patient agree on including administering drugs? Serious question.
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:31 pm to skidry
Short of assisted suicide, what other medical procedure is prohibited by law?
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:33 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Short of assisted suicide, what other medical procedure is prohibited by law?
Medical marijuana is the one that immediately comes to mind
Posted on 7/1/18 at 9:23 pm to Volvagia
I’m no medical expert but I was under the impression that all procedures/devices required approval before they can be used. Thus the need for the recent right to try EO. Again I’m asking more than stating.
This post was edited on 7/1/18 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 7/1/18 at 9:29 pm to STEVED00
While I am morally opposed to abortion, if the argument resides with the 14th amendment, then the right belongs to the born.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 9:54 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Medical marijuana is the one that immediately comes to mind
Legally speaking, it is defined as something that has no medical impact.
So it side steps the above because there are no (according to law) legit application of it.
So he doesn’t have an impact of doctor/patient privacy.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:01 am to STEVED00
It centers around the due process clause of the 14th amendment. You’re trying to balance that constitutional right of the mother with the potential for life. It’s basically impossible to do so the court drew a line in the sand somewhere.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:02 am to STEVED00
quote:
Just Dr/Patient Privacy
4th amendment argument
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:06 am to cahoots
quote:
It centers around the due process clause of the 14th amendment
Aka, unicorns
Substantive Due Process is judicial expansion without real legal justification. Its a concept that was invented out of thin air to give courts more power.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:23 am to STEVED00
quote:Basically said that abortion falls under the right to privacy protected by the 14th amendment and that the states cannot deny women that right until the life of the unborn becomes viable during the 3rd trimester. It removed the rights of the states to outlaw the practice.
What was the actual Roe v Wade decision?
The decision left the choice to perform an abortion to women and their doctors, which I suppose would mean other elective medical decisions would also fall under the same ruling.
I hope that abortion of a ruling (pun intended) gets overturned.
This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 10:34 am
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:25 am to Volvagia
quote:The Medical Device Act regulates what, when, how and whether devices can be used on humans.
Short of assisted suicide, what other medical procedure is prohibited by law?
A doctor can not build his own CT scanner in his garage and use it on humans, as an example.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News