- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:26 am to Ingeniero
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:26 am to Ingeniero
quote:
A question for those who are unhappy with peer review, doctors, the medical industry as a whole: who do we trust to research and review these things then
I mean you can tell from their posts these are really high IQ individuals. All they need is the methodology and the raw data and they can critique it themselves and come up with their own conclusions. I mean, they’ve never done it before but that’s just bc we’ve been hiding it from them!
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:26 am to Ingeniero
quote:No doubt the experts but we now know the "experts" have been corrupted because there was no transparency regarding their collusion with the govt.
who do we trust to research and review these things then?
And yes even local Joe DR has been influenced to a degree despite knucklehead's idiotic protestations ITT
quote:I'll answer that question with this question: What do we make of how Dr. Zelenko, et al, were treated?
If no doctors can be trusted, how do we ever confirm or disprove a study?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:27 am to Ingeniero
quote:
A question for those who are unhappy with peer review, doctors, the medical industry as a whole: who do we trust to research and review these things then? If anyone involved in the medical field is "corrupted" by XYZ entity, we need Joe Blow off the street to do peer review instead? If no doctors can be trusted, how do we ever confirm or disprove a study?
I think these meta-questions are the place you might make fruitful progress even among people who seriously disagree on issues of who is trustworthy.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:27 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Let us know when you have an actual response, DOC
I have no inclination to try to teach a dog calculus.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:29 am to somethingdifferent
Once you stop using chat GPT to make you points for you:
I notice you have yet to deny doing so
Just ask chat GPT for the counterpoint and keep going round in round in circles.
I notice you have yet to deny doing so
Just ask chat GPT for the counterpoint and keep going round in round in circles.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:29 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Not this one. He's not arguing in good faith.
And you are with more of your conspiracy theories?
Butter wouldn’t melt in Doc’s mouth.
quote:
Before I answer, let me emphasize that RFK was lying - witnesses are usually sworn for testimony and the chairman refused to ask him for sworn testimony. They knew he would come in and lie.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:29 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:"Trust me, bro"
What percentage of the papers on PubMed would you classify as “corrupted?”
Did physicians lie, yes or no? Were physicians publicly criticized for going against the govt narrative, yes or no? Has there been corruption in the peer review process, yes or no?
You're not bright
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:30 am to onmymedicalgrind
What’s wrong with ChatGPT as a source? It literally scrubs the entire internet in seconds for an answer.
Member when “Google it” was a thing?
Member when “Google it” was a thing?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:30 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
the methodology and the raw data
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:31 am to somethingdifferent
Debate with chat GPT. AI is more forgiving of idiocy than I am.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:32 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:I've come across this kind of person every now and then here.
Once you stop using chat GPT to make you points for you
When you want to grow up and be an adult, go look online and see if what I said is factual or not.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:32 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:I notice you aren't answering any of my questions.
AI is more forgiving of idiocy than I am
Why is that?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:33 am to somethingdifferent
Go ask ChatGPT what's wrong with Dr. zelenko's protocol and post it here.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:33 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Do you know what the genetic fallacy is?
Debate with chat GPT
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:33 am to TigerDoc
quote:You didn't answer the question
Go ask ChatGPT what's wrong with Dr. zelenko's protocol and post it here
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:33 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
I notice you aren't answering any of my questions. Why is that?

Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:33 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
What’s wrong with ChatGPT as a source?.
Nothing, it just tells me that if you have to use chat GPT to answer what I would classify as a very simple question, then clearly this isn’t a field you know much about. Like I said, dogs and calculus.
You can just use chat GPT for both sides of the debate and leave us out of it
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:34 am to somethingdifferent
You want high quality research, but Dr. Zelenko's research is poor quality.
Now what's your question?
Now what's your question?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:35 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Nothing, it just tells me that if you have to use chat GPT to answer what I would classify as a very simple question, then clearly this isn’t a field you know much about. Like I said, dogs and calculus.
frick off. You haven’t answered a fricking thing either. Better yet; at least he tried using an app. You continue to deflect you disingenuous hack!
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:35 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
Human trials were not performed PRIOR to the covid shots being widely distributed. From what I understand, they had only been used on mice, etc, prior to human application. Hence the EUA.
Popular
Back to top



1



