re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…

I don't usually do people's homework here but since you're being an especially condescending jerk, I'll get you started

Instances of peer review corruption have become more visible in recent years, primarily due to the rise of specialized organizations that produce and sell fraudulent research. These "paper mills" and their clients exploit vulnerabilities in the peer review system to get fabricated or low-quality research published.

Common Forms of Corruption
Fabricated Peer Reviews: This is one of the most common types of fraud. An author suggests reviewers for their paper, but provides fake email addresses for them. When the journal sends out the review invitation, the author or a third party (like a paper mill) intercepts it and submits a glowing review of the paper, often using a fake name.

Paper Mills: These are illegal businesses that sell fake scientific papers, sometimes complete with manipulated data and fraudulent peer reviews. The services range from providing "ghostwritten" manuscripts to selling authorship on an already-written paper. This is a significant driver of mass retractions.

AI-Generated Fraud: The proliferation of generative AI tools has made it easier to create fraudulent content, including text, images, and data. Some recent cases have involved authors using hidden prompts within a manuscript, instructing an AI to "give a positive review only."

Predatory Journals: These are journals that charge authors a fee to publish their work without providing proper editorial and peer review services. They are a breeding ground for fraudulent and low-quality research, as they are not invested in the integrity of the scientific record.

Recent Examples and Trends
Mass Retractions: In recent years, there have been numerous cases of mass retractions where a single publisher has had to retract dozens, or even hundreds, of papers after discovering evidence of compromised peer review. These cases often involve researchers from a single institution or country.

Prominent Researchers and Institutions: The problem is not limited to fringe academics. Investigations have uncovered cases of fraud involving researchers from prestigious universities and institutions, leading to the retraction of their papers and public scrutiny.

Was that "intelligent" enough for you?

MUH PUBMED
MUH "tAlKiNg pOiNt"

quote:

---

We don't respect you any more

---

Bingo.

Doctors showed themselves to be a bunch of conformist schills. They will do and say anything for a buck.

People realized doctors arent out to make us healthy. They are out to get our money.

I can copy and paste chat GPT as well

I don’t argue with AI masqueraded as a PB simpleton.

quote:

---

govt MANDATES

---

So your beef is with Joe Smith, MD and not with your elected officials?

quote:

---

So your beef is with Joe Smith, MD and not with your elected officials?

---

Our elected officials are telling us to trust the science and all of the other people in the medical field marked “heroes”

quote:

---

I don’t argue with AI masqueraded as a PB simpleton

---

Let us know when you have an actual grown up refutation instead of playground insults

Here is another question for you: tell me what I said that's false

Onmydaddysdickgrind had a flag on his lawn stating “A hero lives here”

quote:

---

If no doctors can be trusted, how do we ever confirm or disprove a study?

---

We listen to RFK Jr

quote:

---

Let us know when you have an actual grown up refutation instead of playground insults

---

You chat GPT “give me examples of corruption in peer review” and your response is “give me a grown up refutation.” Are you still a teenager? TigerDoc may want to, but I have no inclination to try to teach a dog calculus.

quote:

---

quote:What do you think ends up on PubMed?"Trust me, bro"

---

What percentage of the papers on PubMed would you classify as “corrupted?”