- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Retroactive background checks
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:04 am
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:04 am
It’s coming. In addition to enhanced vetting and background checks, I predict there will also be a push for retroactive background checks for those that passed one at the time of purchase to see if anything now would deem them ineligible to purchase one.
I would be in favor of this. If you are flagged, because your circumstances have changed, you must turn the weapon in and in violation of new law. Warrant should be issued until you comply and turn weapon in.
Let the downvotes commence.
MAGA
I would be in favor of this. If you are flagged, because your circumstances have changed, you must turn the weapon in and in violation of new law. Warrant should be issued until you comply and turn weapon in.
Let the downvotes commence.
MAGA
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 9:06 am
16
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:06 am to Covingtontiger77
So your idea is more background checks on top of background checks.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:08 am to Covingtontiger77
So another law to prevent law breakers from breaking the law?
When does this cycle of bad decisions end?
When does this cycle of bad decisions end?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:09 am to civiltiger07
To include the new criteria that will be proposed, yes!
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:09 am to Covingtontiger77
And yet the left doesn't even want us to be allowed to ask for a free ID card at the polls.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:09 am to Covingtontiger77
Eat a dick.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:10 am to Covingtontiger77
Dude they don't even keep it on record.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:10 am to Covingtontiger77
I've posted this link several times. During the dear leader's regime they had more than 100K felons "each year" try to buy "new weapons", but they only "considered prosecuting" .04% of them.
Jug Ears wanted felons to have guns.
LINK
O'Blunder also floated the idea of no private businesses being allowed to do any background checks for hiring purposes. He only wanted the gubment to be able to do that.
Jug Ears wanted felons to have guns.
LINK
O'Blunder also floated the idea of no private businesses being allowed to do any background checks for hiring purposes. He only wanted the gubment to be able to do that.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:10 am to Covingtontiger77
It's amazing how off the wall people go when you mention keeping criminals from owning guns.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:11 am to Covingtontiger77
What is the new criteria?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:11 am to Covingtontiger77
we need more laws making killing another human illegal and should ban firearms within 500 feet of schools
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:11 am to Covingtontiger77
quote:
It’s coming. In addition to enhanced vetting and background checks
No, it’s not.
quote:
I predict there will also be a push for retroactive background checks for those that passed one at the time of purchase to see if anything now would deem them ineligible to purchase one.
How do you know the person still owns the gun? Who is going to keep track of all this? Who is going to consistently run these background checks?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:12 am to Covingtontiger77
They don't keep permanent records, so what you would be doing in effect (by changing the system to have permanent records) is keeping a registry of potential gun owners.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:12 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
It's amazing how off the wall people go when you mention keeping criminals from owning guns.
Already against the law. And of the criminals that fill out a 4473 less than 1% of them get prosecuted for breaking the law.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:16 am to GeneralLee
quote:
what you would be doing in effect (by changing the system to have permanent records) is keeping a registry of potential gun owners.
How Hitlarian of them.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:17 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
keeping criminals from owning guns.
It's why I have an alarm and lockable doors on my house.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:17 am to GeneralLee
Bingo
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:19 am to SirWinston
quote:
And yet the left doesn't even want us to be allowed to ask for a free ID card at the polls.
Not only do they not want ID to be presented, they want same day registration.
Think about it, they can then bus people in, fill out a registration card and vote. All without providing an ID that proves you are who you say you are and eligible to vote!
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:21 am to civiltiger07
quote:
less than 1% of them get prosecuted for breaking the law
That's a problem. But I'll expose some white trash side of my family. My aunt was charged and convicted of a felony when she was in her 20s. It was a white collar type to do with child care payments or some shite. I don't know all the details but I know it was something stupid so she deserved whatever happen. She tried to buy a gun from walmart a few years ago for home protection and got denied. I say all that just to wonder what percentage of denials are close to this example. Meaning prosecution could not possibly worth it.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:29 am to GeneralLee
quote:
They don't keep permanent records, so what you would be doing in effect (by changing the system to have permanent records) is keeping a registry of potential gun owners
The NSA says HI. If you think for one second that the NSA doesn’t already have a national database that they keep on every firearm background check done you are kidding yourself.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News