- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Republicans to subpoena whistleblower to testify in public hearing
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:26 am
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:26 am
Republicans intend to subpoena the government whistleblower to testify in the House's impeachment investigation into President Trump's dealings with Ukraine, according to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).
The effort is not likely to bear fruit, as Democrats have rejected the idea of ousting the anonymous figure, citing safety concerns, and they have veto power over any GOP subpoena requests for witness testimony.
LINK
The effort is not likely to bear fruit, as Democrats have rejected the idea of ousting the anonymous figure, citing safety concerns, and they have veto power over any GOP subpoena requests for witness testimony.
LINK
8
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:28 am to Jbird
Is this the WB with the disney pedo lawyer who looks like he was permanently stuffed into lockers?
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:28 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Is this the WB with the disney pedo lawyer who looks like he was permanently stuffed into lockers?
One in the same.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:29 am to SDVTiger
quote:If it's Peter Strzok boy Charlie, then indeed it is.
Is this the WB with the disney pedo lawyer who looks like he was permanently stuffed into lockers?
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:30 am to Jbird
If these hearings go through and the Republican's can't call their own witnesses, and they aren't allowed to face their accuser, this whole thing should be hammered as a kangaroo court and it should not allowed to proceed.
What a fricking joke our entire system has become.
What a fricking joke our entire system has become.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:31 am to Jbird
Not that I’ve really followed this at all...
Do whistleblower laws imply some sort of anonymity? Is this a legal gray area?
What’s the goal?
Do whistleblower laws imply some sort of anonymity? Is this a legal gray area?
What’s the goal?
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:31 am to alajones
quote:Nope.
Do whistleblower laws imply some sort of anonymity?
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:33 am to Jbird
Why doesn't Lindsey Graham get off his corrupt, compromised arse and start subpoenaing some people? If he would do this, Republicans wouldn't have to put up with that human piece of filth known as Shifty Schiff.
I wish Chuck Grassley was still in charge of that committee instead of No Name's little girlfriend.
I wish Chuck Grassley was still in charge of that committee instead of No Name's little girlfriend.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:33 am to Jbird
What safely concerns? From trump? Trump has long known who this spy was.
If they are so scared [they aren't] of trump.. then shouldn't they make their identity known to the whole world? So that evil drumph doesn't kill him in the shadows?
The only purpose of continuing to try to hide this spy's identity, is to try to make sure most of the public don't realize the spy is just a spy who was tasked to illegally spy on a sitting president.
If they are so scared [they aren't] of trump.. then shouldn't they make their identity known to the whole world? So that evil drumph doesn't kill him in the shadows?
The only purpose of continuing to try to hide this spy's identity, is to try to make sure most of the public don't realize the spy is just a spy who was tasked to illegally spy on a sitting president.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:34 am to Jbird
quote:
Republicans intend to subpoena the government whistleblower to testify in the House's impeachment investigation into President Trump's dealings with Ukraine, according to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).
The effort is not likely to bear fruit, as Democrats have rejected the idea of ousting the anonymous figure, citing safety concerns, and they have veto power over any GOP subpoena requests for witness testimony.
Miss Lindsey, you’re on the clock.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:35 am to alajones
quote:According to a Greg Jarrett article yesterday, the law only states that the IG(or whoever the WB files the official complaint with) cannot identify the WB. There is no anonymity protection.
Do whistleblower laws imply some sort of anonymity? Is this a legal gray area?
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:36 am to Jbird
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:37 am to alajones
quote:
Do whistleblower laws imply some sort of anonymity?
No, they basically just made that bullshite up out of whole cloth.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:38 am to Jbird
They should subpoena him in the Senate, but not as the "whistle blower."
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:39 am to Y.A. Tittle
Simple fix for this. Have the senate bring him in for a little chat and then call him again in the impeachment hearing.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:42 am to Jbird
If anonymity is not required by law why the heck is his name not made public?
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:43 am to alajones
quote:
Do whistleblower laws imply some sort of anonymity? Is this a legal gray area?
WB laws only protect from retaliation. can't be fired, reassigned, demoted, ect.
Posted on 11/7/19 at 8:45 am to Pussykat
quote:Threats from the Disney freak, and they are scared if they use his name and something happens to him the MSM will get roasted.
If anonymity is not required by law why the heck is his name not made public?
Oh and it helps Dems.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News