re: Report: Mifsud’s secret recording is the predicate for Durham criminal inquiry

quote:

---

You don’t know what you’re talking about, and you’re a liar, cwill

---

That doesn't bother me I the least, because I'm not cwill.

And your a know-nothing dumbasse.

quote:

---

My response, which you seized on the opportunity to jump on, was to PHDoogan's question involving evidence of coordination. It didn't have anything to you with a post you made.

---

regardless of who you were responding to, you were misquoting the report by using an out of context quote

quote:

---

Is there some reason you arbitrarily excluded evidence of campaign finance violations?

---

campaign finance violations have nothing to do with coordination/collusion with Russia, which is the issue at hand

your quote sounds like there was no intent about coordination when it is no intent about the campaign finance violations

quote:

---

The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban, i

---

wait, so you're trying to pigeon hole campaign finance violations as the "Russian conspiracy" ?

quote:

---

The factors considered in the evaluation of the sufficiency of evidence surrounding the Trump Tower meeting has nothing to do with the matter at hand?

---

not as it pertains to campaign finance violations

we were discussing the decision on "collusion"

and don't try to be 4th level dishonest and try to use the term "Conspiracy" (as it related to members of the campaign itself) used in the campaign finance violations sections as the "conspiracy" between the campaign and Russia

nobody is talking about campaign finance violations or obstruction of justice in this thread.

I warned you not to engage this lying alter.

quote:

---

the "no intent" of Trump you're referencing is about campaign finance violations, not coordination/collusion with Russia

---

You say that I was saying it only relates only to campaign violations. It also applies to the Russia active measures campaign.

quote:

---

the case against Trump re: collusion/coordination was dismissed for much more direct reasons.

---

Was it dismissed because there was no evidence of collusion/coordination?

ALSO, does the case against Trump also include conspiracy to violate the foreign campaign contributions ban?

quote:

---

and don't try to be 4th level dishonest and try to use the term "Conspiracy" (as it related to members of the campaign itself) used in the campaign finance violations sections as the "conspiracy" between the campaign and Russia

---

You think that the campaign finance issue was a conspiracy BETWEEN THE MEMBERS OF THE CAMPAIGN ITSELF?

In the PROSECUTION AND DECLINATION DECISIONS section of the Report (page 185), it discusses the evidence regarding the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting:

quote:

---

The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; the solicitation of an illegal foreign - source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of "an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution, " both in violation of 52 U.S.C. § 3012l(a)(l)(A), (a)(2).

---

The campaign finance question was a potential conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, plain and simple.

quote:

---

i have no idea what "the case against Trump" means exactly, but there was a section of the Mueller report about campaign finance

---

I mean the case against the Trump campaign, not obstruction.

Does the case against the Trump campaign also include conspiracy to violate the foreign campaign contributions ban?

quote:

---

yes that's how investigation work

---

So at the end of this investigation, Mueller decided not to charge the Trump campaign because there was no evidence of collusion/coordination, yes?

Read up on Carter Page getting an advanced copy of OIG report

LINK