- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:56 am to L.A.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:01 am to L.A.
The witch's husband has started a GoFundMe page for her. He says she was targeted for "speaking out."
Just a reminder of what she said when she "spoke out":
Just a reminder of what she said when she "spoke out":
quote:
"I hope you fricking rip from bow to stern and never shite normally again, you c*nt."
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:04 am to Wildcat1996
quote:
over their barbs with the White House Press Corpse
This is funny if it’s intentional, and it’s a different funny if it’s not.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:04 am to idlewatcher
Is it just her licence to practice in FL? If she retains her nursing licence, she could go to any other state and resume her "practice".
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:11 am to L.A.
because i know i'll get downvoted regardless, i'll still start off with "frick this bitch, she got what she had coming and i dont feel sorry for her"
that said - what are the First Amendment implications here? the government is the licensing authority, and they are punishing her for something that she said online. why is this not a violation of her First Amendment rights? is it because she wished violence on someone? genuinely curious for a legal take on this.
that said - what are the First Amendment implications here? the government is the licensing authority, and they are punishing her for something that she said online. why is this not a violation of her First Amendment rights? is it because she wished violence on someone? genuinely curious for a legal take on this.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:16 am to Sam Quint
quote:
that said - what are the First Amendment implications here? the government is the licensing authority, and they are punishing her for something that she said online. why is this not a violation of her First Amendment rights? is it because she wished violence on someone? genuinely curious for a legal take on this.
Because she's a health care provider. It can reasonably be inferred from her comments that she is a danger to certain patients in her care.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News