- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Re-reading about the 17 agencies (Russia)
Posted on 6/16/19 at 11:37 am to funnystuff
Posted on 6/16/19 at 11:37 am to funnystuff
Who did you vote for in 2016?
1
Posted on 6/16/19 at 11:40 am to funnystuff
What do you mean by “hacked” ?
Podesta giving them the password?
Podesta giving them the password?
Posted on 6/16/19 at 12:04 pm to NIH
Trump. Same guy I’m voting for in 2020.
This post was edited on 6/16/19 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 6/16/19 at 12:06 pm to Strannix
Yep. Hacked is common nomenclature for successful phishing attempts. And you know that.
Posted on 6/16/19 at 2:44 pm to gobuxgo5
best part no one even talks about is that at least 12 of those agency had no reason to be briefed in or had any knowledge of anything related to the election or spying attempts related to it.
the coast guard doesnt get daily briefings on or take part in national security as it relates to elections or political corruption.
the coast guard doesnt get daily briefings on or take part in national security as it relates to elections or political corruption.
Posted on 6/16/19 at 3:18 pm to funnystuff
Why wouldn’t the IC wanna know what info is now in the hands of enemies? Isn’t the first thing done when there’s a breach is a damage assessment? How can they assess damage without the server?!
Posted on 6/16/19 at 4:27 pm to Cornbeef
A) That’s a pretty significant goalpost shift from ‘how do we know it was the Russians if we never looked at the server’
B) Not to be too cynical, but I’d assume that the NSA already has a majority of the contents of just about every server in the country
B) Not to be too cynical, but I’d assume that the NSA already has a majority of the contents of just about every server in the country
Posted on 6/16/19 at 4:49 pm to funnystuff
A: not following you, you’re the one who said the ic didn’t have any interest in the server. Why not? There could be many reasons but none of them are good.
B: they probably are which begs more questions...
B: they probably are which begs more questions...
Posted on 6/16/19 at 4:53 pm to Cornbeef
A) I was refuting the assertion that the IC relied on the crowd strike report to identify Russia as the source of the attack
B) Agreed
B) Agreed
Posted on 6/16/19 at 6:15 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
There were some Russian groups putting content out on social media sites, but I don’t know what or how much. Supposedly it wasn’t very much.
And given that the internet has no borders, that’s always going to be nearly impossible to police.
Unfortunate, but that’s the world we live in now.
This post was edited on 6/16/19 at 6:16 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News