Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul Says Jesus Wouldn’t Like the GOP’s Taste for War

Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:50 pm to
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Clinton, Reagan, LBJ, JFK, Nixon, Dubya, Obama...when it comes to war is there a bit of difference between any of them? There's not as far as I can see.

I notice you didn't mention Ike, Bush 41 and Carter, who I think were more noninterventionist when it came to foreign policy, but of the ones you mentioned, I think Obama has a chance to distinguish himself if makes peace with Iran.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45375 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

I think Obama has a chance to distinguish himself if makes peace with Iran.


I think he has distinguished himself as the man who has droned more countries than any other human in history
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Please, don't. I would appreciate that you respect this request.

Please don't what? Rand Paul wanted to make a point about Jesus; I say with a simple quote that he didn't consider every angle.

If you don't like a discussion on the topic you shouldn't be in the thread.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73552 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

I think he has distinguished himself as the man who has droned more countries than any other human in history
He is proud of that fact as well.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

I think he has distinguished himself as the man who has droned more countries than any other human in history

There's no doubt about that. He'll have to answer for it when he goes to meet his maker.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 8:03 pm
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Please don't what? Rand Paul wanted to make a point about Jesus; I say with a simple quote that he didn't consider every angle.


I am asking you to demonstrate kindness and consideration regarding someone I consider my Lord and Savior. Someone I love dearly.

It is as simple as that.

Thank you.
Posted by LaBoyNTn
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
585 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:12 pm to
I have had a healthy dose of disdain for this guy, for a long time. It grows stronger each time I read or hear another of his asinine remarks. What makes him think he knows what Jesus would think? I would prefer he keep his " thought provokin" thoughts to himself. He is beginning to sound nuttier than his dad
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:12 pm to
That quote represents what both Rand and his father represent and it's what I admire about them. And it's why I've said Rand will never win the nomination. Unless of course he sells out. And the nomination for the Republican Party candidate has proven to be impossible for an outsider to win. The comments here against his quote will be what he hears from the mainstream of the party.

What would be interesting is if he ran as a 3rd party candidate and did so early on organizing on all 50 states. My guess is he'd get a sizable following. The problem he'd face is his backers are not geographic like Wallace for instance which allowed him to carry states but instead like Perot where he'd get a good percentage but not necessarily carry states.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:19 pm to
If you follow the links here is the entire quote

quote:

When people come to me and they’re lobbying for ratcheting up some sort of bellicose policy towards one country, even if it's a bad country, I tell them that and when I read the New Testament, that when I read about Jesus, I don’t see him involved, he wasn’t really involved with the wars of his days. And, in fact, people rebuked him for not being [what] they wanted. They wanted somebody to stand up to the Romans. He stood up in a different sort of way, but he didn’t organize coalitions and guerrilla bands and arm them. Now I'm not saying that you shouldn't have people who want to defend against evil, bad forces around the world, but I think you need to remember that he was the prince of peace, you know, we’re talking about "blessed are the peacemakers," not "blessed are the war-makers."
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73552 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

That quote represents what both Rand and his father represent and it's what I admire about them. And it's why I've said Rand will never win the nomination. Unless of course he sells out. And the nomination for the Republican Party candidate has proven to be impossible for an outsider to win.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

If you follow the links here is the entire quote


Thank you. Still disagree with how he incorporated evangelical Christians into his comment, but it does provide context.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61457 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

I notice you didn't mention Ike, Bush 41 and Carter
Intentional.

quote:

but of the ones you mentioned, I think Obama has a chance to distinguish himself if makes peace with Iran.
I have a hunch that Obama has killed more brown people and more Muslims than any of the other presidents I mentioned. That's how he has distinguished himself.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

political issues



No..... not political. In fact he separated the 2. You would have been more correct to say social issues.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:38 pm to
You think he killed more people than Gulf War I and more than the invasions of Afghanistan and Gulf War II?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58396 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Interesting, could you give more details please. Not doubting you just a different take.


It's Old Testament Jewish history. God formed the Jewisj nation with Abraham and he ( God) was their king. Then the Jews saw all their neighbors had earthly kings and they wanted one too. Saul was their first king, followed by king David. David was a military king that killed many men and his armies conquered many lands.
The coming messiah was to be a decendent of king David and the Jews were expecting him to come
back and militarily reestablish Israel as a powerful nation.
When Jesus came as a peaceful spiritual messiah instead of a warrior king, they rejected him not realizing his plans for Israel were meant to be spiritual more than Earthly.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 8:41 pm
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64821 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

in fact, people rebuked him for not being [what] they wanted. They wanted somebody to stand up to the Romans


I would differ on this and so does the New Testament , as well as the Jews.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61457 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

You think he killed more people than Gulf War I and more than the invasions of Afghanistan and Gulf War II?
He presided over Afghanistan and Iraq II. Plus with the drone strikes, yeah I think he's killed more.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

I have a hunch that Obama has killed more brown people and more Muslims than any of the other presidents I mentioned. That's how he has distinguished himself.

Fair point, but W has still probably killed more based on the initial invasion of Iraq. However, I have to concede that it will take a helluva lot of peacemaking for Obama to atone for his drone policy.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:49 pm to
Well the first Gulf War we killed 20-25,000 Iraqi soldiers alone. So even if we don't include civilians, that's quite a number.

My guess would be we killed even mores soldiers in the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq II. Add in "The Surge" and I don't think you're even close.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 8:50 pm to
2400 killed by drones.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram