Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul demands Dems return money raised by "sexual predator" Bill Clinton

Posted on 2/7/14 at 5:31 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135401 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

It was a claim of groping/kissing
Got my Clinton sexual assault victims turned around.

Juanita Broaddrick was the raped woman. You are right. Willey was just the groped woman.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31648 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Juanita Broaddrick was the raped woman.


quote:

Editor's Note: Following is the text of a Jan. 2, 1998, affidavit from the woman known as "Jane Doe No. 5." The Paula Jones legal team in a March 28 filing reported an unsubstantiated hearsay claim that, 20 years ago, Clinton had invited Jane Doe No. 5 to a hotel room and forced her to have sex. This affidavit, in which the woman denies the claim, was released by the Clinton legal team in its March 30 filing (see the Post story).

1. My name is Jane Doe #5. I am 55 years old and have been married since 1981. I have one child, age 28. I currently reside in Arkansas.

2. In November of 1997, two private investigators retained by Paula Corbin Jones approached me at my residence. I declined to speak with them, but provided the name of my family attorney. I subsequently was served with a subpoena seeking the production of documents and purporting to require my testimony at a deposition in the civil action between Paula Corbin Jones and President William Jefferson Clinton (Civil Action No. LR-C-94-290). I have never met Ms. Jones, nor do I have any information regarding the allegations that she has advanced against President Clinton. In this regard, I have no knowledge or information regarding the events she has alleged occurred on May 8, 1991 at the Excelsior Hotel or, for that matter, any knowledge or information regarding any interaction between herself and Mr. Clinton.

3. I met President Clinton more than twenty years ago through family friends. Our introduction was not arranged or facilitated, in any way, by the Arkansas State Police. I have never been an Arkansas state employee or a federal employee. I have never discussed with Mr. Clinton the possibility of state or federal employment nor has he offered me any such position. I have had no further relations with him for the past (15) years.

4. During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.


LINK

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135401 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

1. My name is Jane Doe # . I am 24 years old and I currently reside at 700 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037.

2. On December 19, 1997, I was served with a subpoena from the plaintiff to give a deposition and to produce documents in the lawsuit filed by Paula Corbin Jones against President William Jefferson Clinton and Danny Ferguson.

3. I can not fathom any reason that the plaintiff would seek information from me for her case.

4. I have never met Ms. Jones, nor do I have any information regarding the events she alleges occurred at the Excelsior Hotel on May 8, 1991 or any other information concerning any of the allegations in her case.

5. I worked at the White House in the summer of 1995 as a White House intern. Beginning in December, 1995, I worked in the Office of Legislative Affairs as a staff assistant for correspondence. In April, 1996, I accepted a job as assistant to the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the U.S. Department of Defense. I maintained that job until December 26, 1997. I am currently unemployed but seeking a new job.

6. In the course of my employment at the White House I met President Clinton several times. I also saw the President at a number of social functions held at the White House. When I worked as an intern, he appeared at occasional functions attended by me and several other interns. The correspondence I drafted while I worked at the Office of Legislative Affairs was seen and edited by supervisors who either had the President's signature affixed by mechanism or, I believe, had the President sign the correspondence itself.

7. I have the utmost respect for the President who has always behaved appropriately in my presence.

8. I have never had a sexual relationship with the President, he did not propose that we have a sexual relationship, he did not offer me employment or other benefits in exchange for a sexual relationship, he did not deny me employment or other benefits for rejecting a sexual relationship. I do not know of any other person who had a sexual relationship with the President, was offered employment or other benefits in exchange for a sexual relationship, or was denied employment or other benefits for rejecting a sexual relationship. The occasions that I saw the President after I left employment at the White House in April, 1996, were official receptions, formal functions or events related to the U.S. Department of Defense, where I was working at the time. There were other people present on those occasions.

9. Since I do not possess any information that could possibly be relevant to the allegations made by Paula Jones or lead to possible admissible evidence in this case, I asked my attorney to provide this affidavit to plaintiff's counsel. Requiring my disposition in this matter would cause disruption to my life, especially since I am looking for employment, unwarranted attorney's fees and costs, and constitute an invasion of my right to privacy.

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

(signed)
Monica S. Lewinsky
No link necessary.

¿Comprende?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135401 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 5:52 pm to
But again, You are right, Willey was just the woman Bill Clinton groped (on the day of her husband's death). Juanita Broaddrick was the one who he allegedly raped.

This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 5:54 pm
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31648 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

8. I have never had a sexual relationship with the President,


Same thing Bill said

I guess they had the same idea of what constituted a sexual relationship

Aaaand we're back to where we were almost 20 years ago

Gotta run. Enjoy you some Olympics.
Posted by infantry1026
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
7569 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

dumb comment, imo. It is never smart to insult the most popular president of the 20th century.


At least he is not a chicken shite RINO
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 6:26 pm to
It's a bold move.

Only time will tell if this works.

Definitely a tactic designed to rile up the base and tear into the war on women rhetoric.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Here we go ASURob denying he's no Clinton supporter. Again. Every topic that comes up about Bill, Rob comes in and starts with exactly the same statement:

I am not a Clinton supporter...blah blah blah

Then supports him and crucifies anyone who has the audacity to speak so badly of his hero..err I mean the guy he doesn't support or like.


idiot.

Clinton was a terrible person.

But a decent president.

I didn't vote for him and will not vote for his moronic wife.


That being said if you are just tossing shite up against anyone out there hoping it will stick I will call you on it.

That includes W...who I hate as well.
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 6:29 pm
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

For the party that is supposedly for women's rights y'all sure do love to throw dirt on them when they make accusations against ASURobs beloved Bill.


She was caught lying several times.

That pretty much takes care of her accusations.

Next.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

It's a bold move.

Only time will tell if this works.

Definitely a tactic designed to rile up the base and tear into the war on women rhetoric.

The key is to rile up your base without riling up the other party's base. Too often Ted Cruz riles up Democrats as much as he riles up Republicans. I don't think going after Clinton for womanizing will rile up Democrats too much, since no one can deny that about Clinton, but how much will it rile up Republicans, considering how old this story is?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135401 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

I don't think going after Clinton for womanizing will rile up Democrats too much, since no one can deny that about Clinton
If ignoring equates to denial, EVERYone on the LEFT and EVERYone in the MSM is in ABJECT denial.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135401 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

She was caught lying several times.

That pretty much takes care of her accusations.
Well asurob1, there is the true War on Women! . . . . . .

She was a pole dancer in the past! Therefore she could not have been raped.

She was a hooters waitress in the past! Therefore she could not have been groped.

She was a showgirl in the past! Therefore she could not have been assaulted and sodomized.

Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
18907 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 7:54 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:36 am
Posted by todospm
Member since Sep 2013
526 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

war on women rhetoric.


The GOP will not win that battle, pointing to one man's infidelity and immoral behavior. Especially when the other side can point to concrete GOP-driven policy that reduces access to abortion clinics, morning after pills, etc.


Furthermore, the GOP is not running against Bill Clinton. It's running against Hillary Clinton, who enjoys an ironclad record on women's issues, which I'm sure Rand would have discovered if knew about a site called Wikipedia.

Women voters are not going punish the most visible left-wing, 'pro-woman' female of our generation because her husband sins in his private life.
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 8:22 pm
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

If ignoring equates to denial, EVERYone on the LEFT and EVERYone in the MSM is in ABJECT denial.

Ignoring Old News =/= Denial.
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:26 pm to
Well we know how important old news is, like Romney cutting someone's hair 40 years ago.... Amirite?
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

Well we know how important old news is, like Romney cutting someone's hair 40 years ago.... Amirite?

You mean like Bill Clinton smoking marijuana in college?

By the way, tonight on MSNBC's Hardball, Paul's repeated attacks on Clinton was discussed, and the consensus opinion seemed to be that it was probably a shrewd and tactically savvy move. Check it out.

LINK
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 9:41 pm
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:33 pm to
No i dont think him smoking in college is important, although his "didnt inhale" response was about the weakest, most typical political answer he could have possibly given......
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Gulf Shores
Member since Nov 2013
7160 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Especially when the other side can point to concrete GOP-driven policy that reduces access to abortion clinics, morning after pills, etc.






A few of us see the big picture and consider things other than our vaginas. Those of us who aren't moved by lib-prog " but they want to take your rights away!!!" hair burning bull shite are reaching out to our emotionally driven sisters and leading them to the light.

Women are waking up.
I'm proud to do my part.
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 2/7/14 at 11:15 pm to
If you think Clinton was a good president you are full of it.

Wanted Obamacare 20 years ago like a fool, and lied under oath.
A dopehead, and liar, great role model.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram