Started By
Message

re: Prosecutor in Durham Probe Resigns

Posted on 9/11/20 at 8:59 pm to
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131359 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 8:59 pm to
it wasn't a paywall for me either.

Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73470 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:01 pm to
The courant is asking again for 99 cents to read the article



Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131359 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Federal prosecutor Nora Dannehy, a top aide to U.S. Attorney John H. Durham in his Russia investigation, has quietly resigned — at least partly out of concern that the investigative team is being pressed for political reasons to produce a report before its work is done, colleagues said.

Dannehy, a highly regarded prosecutor who has worked with or for Durham for decades, informed colleagues in the U.S. Attorney’s office in New Haven of her resignation from the Department of Justice by email Thursday evening. The short email was a brief farewell message and said nothing about political pressure, her work for Durham or what the Durham team has produced, according to people who received it.

Durham, who has never even acknowledged that Dannehy was in Washington working for him, had no immediate comment on the resignation.

Durham recruited Dannehy to join his team after he was appointed by Attorney General William Barr more than a year and a half ago to examine the FBI’s legal justification for a disputed counterintelligence investigation that looked for ties between President Donald J. Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian efforts to meddle in the election.

[Related] Connecticut faces severe drought, prompting water call for water conservation »
Dannehy is a career prosecutor who worked closely with Durham before leaving the U.S. Attorney’s office about a decade ago for a corporate position in the defense industry. Durham persuaded her to return to the justice department and, within weeks, join his team in Washington in the spring of 2019.

Colleagues said Dannehy is not a supporter of President Trump and has been concerned in recent weeks by what she believed was pressure from Barr, who appointed Durham, to produce results before the election. They said she has been considering resigning for weeks, conflicted by loyalty to Durham and concern about politics.

Durham is notoriously circumspect and neither he nor members of his team have revealed anything about the direction of their work. But Durham associates, none of whom have specific knowledge of the investigation, have said recently that it is their belief he is under pressure to produce something — perhaps some sort of report — before the presidential election in November.

The thinking of the associates, all Durham allies, is that the Russia investigation group will be disbanded and its work lost if Trump loses.

Dannehy was told to expect an assignment of from six months to a year when she agreed to join Durham’s team in Washington, colleagues said. The work has taken far longer than expected, in part because of complications caused by the coronavirus pandemic. In the meantime, team members — some of whom are current or former federal investigators or prosecutors with homes in Connecticut — have been working long hours in Washington under pressure to produce results, associates said.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73470 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:07 pm to


So a nothingburger. Figured
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:09 pm to
I go after boosie's BS all the time. I did in this thread. This time I laughed at someone making fun of boosie.

Who cares? I can tell boosie his politics are fricked up and to frick off and he tells me frick off in return. only you Q people think you are in a club. most of us are adults out here in normieville.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:10 pm to
really 99 cents you must have read it before and your time is up.
Posted by RICHIE APRILE
Essex County, NJ
Member since Aug 2020
791 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:10 pm to
I like sundance's take on this

He says that this is because she doesn't want to rock the boat anymore and wants to return to the private sector to where she can continue to personally profit off the corrupt DC system. If she stays on and continues to poke into places and go down rabbit holes that will rock the boat it will jeopardize her ability to continue to profit from the system
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:21 pm to
LINK

thanks, Sundance has been busy I only saw the other twitter thread of the announcement earlier...

and I saw this


Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:31 pm to
Sundance put a pic up of Honest Bob at the end....

hmmmmmmmmmm

What do you think?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:38 pm to
You are new I just noticed-sorry.

Honest Bob is what Mueller is called, Turtle is what McConnell is called. The Q club will downvote Sundance; they don't like him because he calls the trusty the planners out when needed.
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33659 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:47 pm to
No secret I'm a big fan of SWC over at RedState, here's his take:

LINK

quote:

So far as I can tell, there is no "validated" explanation. She sent a short email to colleagues in Conn with the announcement and no reason. Speculation is she's not happy with what might be about to happen.

But that is the "easy" speculation that lines up with what the press wants to be true, so it's easy to put that out with just a thin reed of support.
Here's an alternative just as plausible.

Dannehy is a 1986 Harvard Law Grad. That puts her in her like between 59-61 years old. She started with DOJ in 1991. She left at the end of 2010 to become Dep. AG of Conn. She rejoined Durham in March 2019 for his investigation.

Dep. AG of Conn, is the No. 2 position -- it's a policy job, not a courtroom job.
Durham's investigation to date has been in the "investigation" stage. That is very different than the courtroom stage.

By putting in the 18 months she has, she has likely gone over 20 years federal service time -- which she might not have had when she left in Dec. 2010 to become Dep. AG of Conn since she joined DOJ in 1991 -- 19 years earlier.

If indictments are coming, that is a commitment of another 18-24 months minimum if she was going to stay with the case until completed -- unlike the senior SCO prosecutors who all left with cases still pending.

So this might be nothing more than someone who has already put in a long career -- and how is 10 years removed from having tried cases in federal court -- saying "Someone else is a better candidate for trying these cases than I am."

She has spent her entire legal career making $150-200k a year tops. Maybe she has a private practice job lined up at 3x that, and thinks "I've got 10 years left".
That was my thinking when I left -- every year I stayed at $170,000 was one less year at a larger amount.


quote:

She might be someone who tried her last case a long time ago, and isn't interested in returning to the courtroom. That is not uncommon.


Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87416 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:49 pm to
Could be as simple as her part is done and she wants to move on

Could be she knows that when their finding are published everyone on the team will come under a firestorm and she wants out before hand

Pretty clear there is something there for it to be “political” in nature
Posted by fatboydave
Fat boy land
Member since Aug 2004
17979 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:53 pm to
She resigned because she couldn't handle the phone wiping business
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
29998 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Could be as simple as her part is done and she wants to move on

Could be. Could be any number of things. But as for the specific idea quoted above, the entire team is to be disbanded at some point or another, and this particular lady came aboard only for the appointed purpose of this investigation, and once her's and each of the others' work/role has concluded....it's back to what they were doing before their temporary (for most of them) appointment to this team. Which I believe for her was lucrative practice of law in the private sector.
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13103 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 10:48 pm to
Prosecutors resigned from Mueller probe when it was winding up, probably same thing going on here.
This post was edited on 9/11/20 at 10:50 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 7:27 am to
quote:

No secret I'm a big fan of SWC over at RedState, here's his take:

LINK
I forgot why I quit reading SWC. I went to his twitter page

https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew

And I remembered quickly why he chaps my hide. He knows no more than anyone else on twitter with insider information or educated guesses. I don't care what he did/does for a living in law enforcement.

Pick on Sundance all day long. He has more humility and a prayer request spot on his site. He is what he is and has a reputation for his sources. While not always perfect with his insight. If he seems showy it is because he isn't sitting on his arse saying get popcorn enjoy the show.

This SWC person, every other third tweet calls out Sundance to say he knows it all and bash Sundance. Like some of the special coveted club here in poli.

Why is SWC flapping his wings saying he is wet look at me... And not just giving all of his insight w/o having a mini war with Sundance that Sundance isn't even participating in?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Twitter is buzzing with indictments coming, here is one that is saying today!



LINK
ETA: I read the timeline above. I would garner a guess something should happen any day now. But since when does the govt work on a Saturday? But ya never know...
This post was edited on 9/12/20 at 8:00 am
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:00 am to
Durham could indict 50 people today and none of that would matter if nobody from the top brass gets the axe.

They will do this shite again and again.

That's why our country is a banana republic at this point. The Dems get the WH it will be exactly the same as 08-16 surveillance GOP and others.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146646 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:04 am to
Your point can't be argued against that if the dems get the full power back with Biden....the dems and the GOPe/deep state will indeed set up Trump AGAIN.

They won't rest until he or some in his family are jailed---to make the point that no one shall take their control away-- in dirty slush funds with the CCP -- EVER AGAIN.

But from Barr's remarks at his last hearing alone. HE SEES WHAT IS GOING on. I think he will find a comfy balance of appearance of justice without taking his glorified coveted DC institutions down
This post was edited on 9/12/20 at 8:07 am
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
29998 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:07 am to
I disagree....regardless of what punishment/retribution is doled out for past acts, in terms of the future there won't be the same environment as before that allowed these people the run of the place to carry out their nefarious deeds. There will be a positive legacy that stems from all this. No one thought to even be on the lookout for this type of activity before. In the future there will be watchdogs for this stuff, be it Congressional or otherwise. JMO
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram