Started By
Message

Proposed bill would allow teachers to carry concealed weapons on school campuses

Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:37 pm
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
30954 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:37 pm
LINK

quote:

A bill filed for the regular Louisiana legislative session aims to permit teachers and other school personnel holding valid concealed carry permits to possess concealed weapons on school campuses.

State Representative Lauren Ventrella (R-Central) filed HB721, which “Provides for the carrying of a concealed weapon in a school or on a school campus by a certified teacher or school administrator who is employed by a school district and possesses a valid concealed handgun permit.”

Currently, existing law prohibits anyone from carrying a weapon on a school campus during regular school hours or on a school bus.


Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
8593 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:59 pm to
Best news I have heard all day.
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9152 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:02 pm to
They should have to go thru some training before being allowed to.
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:02 pm to
Excellent!!

Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50405 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:03 pm to
Good
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

They should have to go thru some training before being allowed to.



They should have their constitutional rights to protect and defend their life and liberty respected and observed. The fact that they aren't is the reason that schools are killing zones for the mentally deranged.

They should be paid extra money if they choose to take handgun defense training and submit to psychological evaluations, for taking on the responsibility of protecting children with violence if necessary.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26190 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

They should be paid extra money if they choose to take handgun defense training and submit to psychological evaluations,

No problem with that. But the bolded portions are necessary if we're going to do this in schools, IMO.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

No problem with that. But the bolded portions are necessary if we're going to do this in schools, IMO.


Only if they intend to actively protect the kids. If they want to carry to protect themselves, they should have every right that any other citizen has. They aren't in the military. If their constitutional rights are dependent on their job, they aren't constitutional rights, they are privileges, granted by the government.
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9260 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:22 pm to
College instructors and professors definitely should have the option to carry. They only deal with adults, and their environment is also dangerous at times.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26190 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

If their constitutional rights are dependent on their job, they aren't constitutional rights, they are privileges, granted by the government.


Carrying in schools is not a constitutional right at present. It would be a privilege afforded by the legislature and it would hopefully involve the aforementioned requirements, at the very least.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Carrying in schools is not a constitutional right at present.


bullshite. Do I need to quote you the 2A? At present, it is mostly not allowed by government fiat, which has plastered a large target for the demented on our schools and our children.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26190 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

bullshite. Do I need to quote you the 2A?

Quote it all you want. I'm guessing you are one of the people who believe that the Second Amendment is the only legal principle in the entire body of law of the United States that cannot be reasonably restricted?

State gun-free school zone laws are constitutional.

Louisiana has one.
Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
3227 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:35 pm to
I’m in favor of coded gun lock boxes accessible to 10-20 teachers and admins located in several locations secretly across a primary or secondary campus. Teachers must pass a safety course and demonstrate proficiency and are then given their own personal code. In the event of a shooting, these teachers can then access the guns from a location where the shooters are not and confront.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
3785 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

They should have to go thru some training before being allowed to.


Why?

And exactly what kind of training?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
3785 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

I'm guessing you are one of the people who believe that the Second Amendment is the only legal principle in the entire body of law of the United States that cannot be reasonably restricted?


I'm likewise guessing you are one of those people who think that any restriction anyone wants to impose is constitutional, including, "No one needs one of those."

AmIright?
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 1:41 pm
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
3785 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

In the event of a shooting, these teachers can then access the guns from a location where the shooters are not and confront.


Why is that better than the guns being on the teacher's person?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Quote it all you want. I'm guessing you are one of the people who believe that the Second Amendment is the only legal principle in the entire body of law of the United States that cannot be reasonably restricted?


Can congress make a law establishing a religion for the US, or prohibiting the free exercise of religion? Or can they just decide on a case by case basis, not unlike that of deciding that your job means you cannot exercise your rights as an American?

Can the government search your property without a warrant if the supreme court says so?

The Supreme Court is not the law. The Constitution is the law. It can either be observed and upheld, or it is violated. When the Supreme Court observes and upholds the Constitution, they are doing their job. When they carve out situations and instances when citizens are stripped of their constitutional rights, they are tyrants.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

I’m in favor of coded gun lock boxes accessible to 10-20 teachers and admins located in several locations secretly across a primary or secondary campus. Teachers must pass a safety course and demonstrate proficiency and are then given their own personal code. In the event of a shooting, these teachers can then access the guns from a location where the shooters are not and confront.


I don't see how that is feasible at all, unless the secret locations are somewhere in the classroom with the teacher, and even then you are putting a teacher in a position of trying to remember a code to access a weapon to protect to kids while it is likely that one of the most traumatic events of their life is happening.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26190 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

The Supreme Court is not the law. The Constitution is the law. It can either be observed and upheld, or it is violated. When the Supreme Court observes and upholds the Constitution, they are doing their job. When they carve out situations and instances when citizens are stripped of their constitutional rights, they are tyrants.


Then I guess live in la-la land. SCOTUS is the arbiter of what is constitutional and what isn't.

And I notice you conveniently left off freedom of speech, the press, and to peaceably assemble out of your first amendment piece. Congress has surely passed laws abridging those rights.

"Shall make no law" is just as textually restrictive as "shall not be infringed"
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 2:06 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26190 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

AmIright?

No. you are not.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram