- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: President Donald Trump doesn’t know if he should uphold the constitution.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:08 am to Odysseus32
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:08 am to Odysseus32
quote:
I don’t know how you can spin this.
well your media was able to spin it on you to make you think there are grave circumstances. Your former President literally defied the Supreme Court and in fact, the politicians from your side actually put the Supreme Court in danger in doxing them.
There is something called common sense, which I know, your party does not practice....but common sense says these thugs must be deported, and that every single thug deported makes the U.S. a little more safer for someone.
0
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:35 am to Odysseus32
Biden wiped his arse with it for 4 years and directly defied Supreme court rulings, and now you stupid fricks get your little pussies in a frenzy because Trump said “I don’t know”?
I guess that was (D)ifferent?
There will be another civil war in this country.
I guess that was (D)ifferent?
There will be another civil war in this country.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:37 am to Odysseus32
quote:Yet, that's exactly what you've done.
don’t know how you can spin this.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:51 am to Odysseus32
What part isn't he upholding?
Posted on 5/5/25 at 6:42 am to RobbBobb
quote:
No court, not even the Supremes, can tell the Exec who he has to issue security clearances to
Roberts understands that Trump will ignore him under Article II, and theres not a damn thing Roberts can do about it. Plus, the Congress will likely pass legislation that says the courts cannot intervene in X, Y or Z which is rooted in Article II (troop movements, war powers, cabinet nominations, warrants on illegal crossings, security clearances, forced hirings, etc)
Roberts will not allow that shame and rebuke to define his court
Pretty much this.
Roberts cares about the Court's reputation and authority. He's serving up Trump (or any president) openly ignoring/defying SCOTUS rulings if he doesn't unfrick this.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:02 am to udtiger
quote:
He's serving up Trump (or any president) openly ignoring/defying SCOTUS rulings if he doesn't unfrick this.
That won't end well for Trump
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
He's serving up Trump (or any president) openly ignoring/defying SCOTUS rulings if he doesn't unfrick this.
That won't end well for Trump
His favorite president is Andrew Jackson. He's not concerned.
The President takes and oath to support and defend the Constitution, not to support and defend the Constitution as the SCOTUS interprets it.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:07 am to Odysseus32
quote:
Odysseus32
That you can breathe on your own, is a miracle.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:09 am to udtiger
quote:
His favorite president is Andrew Jackson. He's not concerned.
He'll probably care about the impeachment-removal or, at the least, the electoral losses that would result, I reckon.
quote:
The President takes and oath to support and defend the Constitution, not to support and defend the Constitution as the SCOTUS interprets it.
This is the rhetoric of authoritarianism, which is why invalidating, attacking, and often replacing the courts is pretty universal in authoritarian takeovers.
I'm not arguing Trump is a dictator, to clarify for the smoothbrains. I'm pointing out you're arguing he should start being one.
This post was edited on 5/5/25 at 7:10 am
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
hat won't end well for Trump
"That"?
We now start with false assumptions, then built hypos on that foundation?
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:10 am to Spawn
He needs to save this country from himself
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:20 am to Stonehenge
quote:
He needs to save this country from himself
He should have never paid those whores to pee on Obama's bed in Moscow.
He should have never teamed up with Putin in 2016.
He should have never called our dead soldiers suckers and losers.
He should have never promoted Hunter's laptop (aka Russian disinfo) as truth.
He should have never said he doesn’t know if he should uphold the constitution.
Please Lord, save us from all these things Trump should have never done,
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:20 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
"That"?
We now start with false assumptions, then built hypos on that foundation?
Yeah he made a post and I replied to "that"
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:21 am to udtiger
quote:
The President takes and oath to support and defend the Constitution, not to support and defend the Constitution as the SCOTUS interprets it.
Trump said in his interview with MTP and Time Magazine this past week he would follow whatever the Supreme Court says.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:22 am to redneck hippie
quote:
Trump said in his interview with MTP and Time Magazine this past week he would follow whatever the Supreme Court says.
Yeah he's not dumb.
His followers just want him to be, for some reason.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You responded as if "that" were fact. You went so far as to say "this won't end well for Trump." But the "this" you referenced is total bullshite.
Yeah he made a post and I replied to "that"
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:27 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
You responded as if "that" were fact.
No. I responded to his post as if it were his post, which it was.
quote:
You went so far as to say "this won't end well for Trump."
No. I said THAT won't end well for Trump.
That = the post. As I told you already
quote:
Yeah he made a post and I replied to "that"
quote:
But the "this" you referenced is total bullshite.
I didn't say "this", first of all
And if you think his post is bullshite, you can freely reply to it yourself
Posted on 5/5/25 at 7:54 am to udtiger
quote:As SFP backed away from any claim of facts backing this assertion (a message resides there), I'll ask you ... if Trump "doesn't unfrick" what?
He's serving up Trump (or any president) openly ignoring/defying SCOTUS rulings if he doesn't unfrick this.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 8:11 am to Odysseus32
I’m not sure what exactly you’re referring to, but if it’s the fact that Trump is considering ignoring some low level leftist district judges’ orders, then what in the frick does any of that have to do with the constitution ? I don’t believe any of these district “justices” had anything to do with writing the constitution. Instead of trying to give us some gotcha moment, why don’t you tell us what exactly you oppose that Trump is doing? You want the MS13 guy back in the country?
Posted on 5/5/25 at 8:13 am to Odysseus32
3 independent branches as defined by the Constitution. A some point one of the branches may have to exercise their authority regardless of the views of the other 2. This may be that time in history. We are truly in a constitutional crisis brought about by traitors and enemies of the state. Radical unelected judges should not have the power to stop the Executive branch from exercising their duties under the Constitution.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News