- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Predictions on Khalil (former Columbia student) hearing today?
Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:56 pm to JimEverett
Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:56 pm to JimEverett
All good questions. My guess is that the government is foreclosed from using any other evidence because that's all they submitted in response to "what evidence do you have?"
This post was edited on 4/11/25 at 1:25 pm
2
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:01 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Lets hope that whatever the decision is that this Judge writes a complete Memo giving us all the details.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:06 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
All good questions. My guess is that the government is foreclosed from using any other evidence because that's all they submitted in response to "what evidence do you have."
Rubio's declaration might be evidence enough. What I've read though is that the courts are generally hesitant to endorse deportation of green card holders without having committed a crime or over 1st amendment issues. Also, here's a little known factoid. Khalil also has the legal right own a gun.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:07 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Lets hope that whatever the decision is that this Judge writes a complete Memo giving us all the details.
Agree, but I suspect that we will see almost nothing. Again the judge is an at will employee who can be fired for any reason at any time by the same Administration that wants to deport Khalil.
My prediction of the entirety of the reasoning: "Deportable for the reasons stated by the Government."
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:18 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Another fun question. What procedural and evidentiary rules apply?
On the face of it, Rubio's memo would be inadmissible hearsay.
On the face of it, Rubio's memo would be inadmissible hearsay.
This post was edited on 4/11/25 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:25 pm to Stinger_1066
And again a green card can be cancelled, rejected, terminated on just the idea of being a threat to the country, a criminal or just a plain piece of shitt
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:28 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Interesting, never thought about that. Certainly, the basis for his determination is other people's statements.
Federal Rules of Evidence are not used in immigration courts. At least according to my quick google search.
Federal Rules of Evidence are not used in immigration courts. At least according to my quick google search.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:35 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Federal Rules of Evidence are not used in immigration courts. At least according to my quick google search
Thanks
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:35 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I hope he is found to be deportable and is removed as soon as possible
Posted on 4/11/25 at 2:18 pm to LRB1967
quote:
hope he is found to be deportable and is removed as soon as possible
I'm with you if all the allegations against him are true. I'd like to hear his side of the story.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 2:59 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Judge just said get him the fuk out of here
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:12 pm to Pandy Fackler
And the protester is out of here !
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:12 pm to Da Sheik
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:13 pm to Stinger_1066
While you were wrong on the topic this POS is out of here
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Shocker. Most of our resident “lawyers” were wrong again
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:19 pm to Nosevens
quote:
And the protester is out of here !
Well not yet, he gets to appeal.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:20 pm to Pandy Fackler
Just take your L brother.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:24 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I am genuinely surprised but ecstatic. I was expecting the traditional "no standing" dismissal. 
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:27 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Well not yet, he gets to appeal
I am guessing this goes on for a while.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News