- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Potatobrain to require microchips firms receiving CHIPS Act subsidies to "share" profits
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:51 am to trinidadtiger
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:51 am to trinidadtiger
There’s a cadre of posters that seem to smoke a joint then engage in stream of consciousness posting. 
0
Posted on 3/1/23 at 7:59 am to NC_Tigah
Excess profits?
What is that definition?
What is that definition?
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:02 am to moneyg
quote:
It’s unconstitutional.
No it's not.
Grants/government loans have always had all sorts of regulations, and some (like the aforementioned bailouts) have repayment schedules.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:02 am to NC_Tigah
Microprocessors are assembled by automated robotic manufacturing processes. The assembly plants don't have huge labor forces like in auto manufacturing. The daycare provisions can't be mush because the staff isn't that large.
Look at 3:14 on this video :
LINK
Point is you don't have an army of people with soldering irons soldering transistors to a circuit board.
Look at 3:14 on this video :
LINK
Point is you don't have an army of people with soldering irons soldering transistors to a circuit board.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:05 am to NC_Tigah
Don't worry. They will all get $149,999,999. Probably create separate entities to do it.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:07 am to Big Jim Slade
quote:
Is that a classic kickback scheme?
10% for the Big Guy.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:If it exceeds executive authority based on legislative parameters, it is. Several Congressmen are making that claim.
It’s unconstitutional.
No it's not.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:17 am to lsu13lsu
quote:
10% for the Big Guy.
Exactly, the Biden (democrat) business plan for all government funds.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:19 am to SantaFe
quote:Care for a do over?quote:The assembly plants don't have huge labor forces like in auto manufacturing. The daycare provisions can't be mush because the staff isn't that large.
Not only are they required to provide child care for workers after plants open, they are required to fund daycare for construction workers building their plants.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 8:36 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Not only are they required to provide child care for workers after plants open, they are required to fund daycare for construction workers building their plants. SMH.
These evil fricks will do anything to find a way to get their hands on children.
So how will all of this be calculated for stock price purposes?
So the Right provides tax breaks, and the Left goes the hold hostage vis money handouts route. Of they only held the real leeches of our society to the same standards.
Democrats trying to add this to a law already signed really is ballsy. It's like they have no cares about how it looks or it being used against them in the future. They either know they can't win in 24 or "can't lose".
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News