Started By
Message

re: Pompeo: Saudi oil attacks an 'act of war' by Iran

Posted on 9/18/19 at 7:59 pm to
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Get some help dude. Seriously, your hate for people who advocate for small government is ridiculous.


Give me a break. Libertarians have been beating off to Tulsi since she entered this race, and she is a socialist. So socialism is okay, as long as you intend to decimate our military. Libertarians should be embarrassed.

IBChinaman and several other libertarians have been railing against Trump for fighting for Americans against China.

Every time the possibility of having to use our military for what it is intended, you guys ramp up the doom and gloom, and act like libertarian support has been vital to Trump’s success. The truth is, like always, you folks look for any opportunity to abandon the only people and agenda that make your philosophy even somewhat relevant.

Hatred for people who want smaller government? Get real. I understand that your philosophy has not a snowballs chance in hell of ever reducing the size of government. You guys can’t reduce the size of government in the damn town you live in, because libertarians don’t have a majority in as much as a school board across the entire country. And yet you look for every opportunity to shite on and abandon the one party that at least does a half assed job of opposing those who would gladly implement a totalitarian government if given a chance.
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:04 pm to
It was an act of war... Just not on the United States of America. Let the middle East middle East.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:08 pm to
You want to send Americans to die for gas prices because they enlisted in the military. You're one fricked up individual.

I bet you loved some John McCain.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
41039 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

And yet you look for every opportunity to shite on and abandon the one party that at least does a half assed job of opposing those who would gladly implement a totalitarian government if given a chance.

Bush, McCain and Romney had no interest in limiting government, yet they were the Republican nominees for President this century before Trump. Look at the folks in the Bush Administration. How many of them voted for Hillary in 2016? McCain and Romney were Never Trumpers. Trump's election essentially proved libertarians right: that the modern Republican Party had zero interest in conservatism, given that most of the party apparatus were openly opposed to him before and after his election.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

You want to send Americans to die for gas prices because they enlisted in the military. You're one fricked up individual.

I bet you loved some John McCain.



Your playbook is old, dude. Our military mission is, and should be, to blow up shite and kill people. Sometimes people die in doing so. Sometimes they die training to do so. There is no sane reason at this time to put our military at much more risk than they take training to do their jobs. That doesn’t preclude severely punishing Iran for pulling the shite they’ve pulled, costing not only Americans, but the rest of the work billions.

For the record, I hated McCain with a purple passion, but voted for him and Palin, because pretending he would have been worse than Obama is bullshite, and yet another reason to call libertarians on their bullshite. Yes, McCain was shitty, may have been the worst, but he wasn’t a Marxist/socialist, bent on destroying this country. You guys were okay with that, as long as he was a giant pussy, willing to gut our military.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66986 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:24 pm to
What would your position be if Hillary was pushing this neocon crap?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Bush, McCain and Romney had no interest in limiting government, yet they were the Republican nominees for President this century before Trump.


I shouldn’t have to explain this, but here goes. It doesn’t make a damn bit of difference if there were those on our side who were more about smaller government. It only matters if they were more about smaller government than Algore, and Lurch and Obama. To pretend they aren’t, is utter bullshite.
Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:32 pm to
I mean so was 9/11 by the Saudis. It's tough for me to even consider any good feelings towards those fricks.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61314 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

I'm super cool with us dropping bombs on their military infrastructure, their war ships, their military unit barracks, they nuclear enrichment facilities, etc., I just don't want to see us invade the country.


frick that. If they want to fight Iran they can do it themselves. OPEC bullshite should stay within OPEC.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

What would your position be if Hillary was pushing this neocon crap?


You’ll have to be more specific. If you mean blowing up shite and killing people in Iran, I would not oppose it at this point. They are begging for it. Now they have successfully done harm to Americans, and the American economy. I think no more than 20-30 well placed and well timed missiles would do wonders for Iran, and their bullshite.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66986 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:39 pm to
Fair enough. I just think there wouldn't have been much difference between her foreign policy and Dubya. At least you're consistent.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Shia Islam (Iran) is far less dangerous to us than the radical Sunni doctrines funded worldwide by the Saudi's. Al Qaeda isn't Shia, ISIS isn't Shia, the Muslim Brotherhood isn't Shia, Al Shabaab isn't Shia and Al Nusra isn't Shia.




you get it

Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Fair enough. I just think there wouldn't have been much difference between her foreign policy and Dubya. At least you're consistent.


Here is one of the main differences between myself, and the libertarian types I clash with here. If Trump decides to deal with Iran without bombing the shite out of them, I’m not going to abandon him and his agenda, because regardless of how he chooses to deal with this situation, it will be one hell of a lot better than Elizabeth Warren, or Joe Biden, or Tulsi Gabbard, or Kamala Harris could ever dream of handling it.
Posted by JustLSUit
North Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
3404 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 9:07 pm to
Come on man, you know this is all deep state. Every bit of it, shite is about to hit the fan that’s going to frick every single one of them. This I war
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126640 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 9:13 pm to
Not our problem
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Yes, McCain was shitty, may have been the worst, but he wasn’t a Marxist/socialist, bent on destroying this country.




Might want to rethink that, slick.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

Might want to rethink that, slick.


So as I said, given the choice between a POS capitalist republican, and a POS Marxist/socialist democrat, you choose the socialist. Thank you for your honesty, Mr. Libertarian.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

So as I said, given the choice between a POS capitalist republican, and a POS Marxist/socialist democrat, you choose the socialist. Thank you for your honesty, Mr. Libertarian.


The playbook of a liberal. I'll give you the choice I made then I'll give you the choice I want you to have.

Hint, there are always more than two choices. Stop parading around as a Republican, you aren't.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62962 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Saudi oil attacks an 'act of war' by Iran


This is a true statement for sure. It's not an "act of war" against the US though.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

The playbook of a liberal. I'll give you the choice I made then I'll give you the choice I want you to have.

Hint, there are always more than two choices. Stop parading around as a Republican, you aren't.



Ever the daydreaming idealist. Pretending that someone other than Obama or McCain could possibly win the presidency, doesn’t make it so, Skippy. Vote however you may, but if it wasn’t for one or the other, you’re just playing games, letting others decide for you, and absolving yourself of the repercussions.
This post was edited on 9/18/19 at 10:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram