Paglia on why feminists hate men

I don't mind chatting with certain women.

quote:

---

men and women are different. They always will be. Feminists have to come to grips with it.'

---

This is an eternal axiom.

But yes - the 'women chat" angle is one I had never thought of nor heard anyone else present it .



eta - just noticed your new sig quote -

quote:

---

Socialism: You can vote yourself into it, but you have to shoot yourself out of it.

---

I watched a video yesterday of Ms. Paglia has she cited historical evidence of transgender mania being a sign of cultural collapse.

She usually provides interesting insight on issues.

Erin: I swear to goodness she’s the only smart socialist I can name. Woman is brilliant.

quote:

---

I can’t agree with the men don’t chat part though,

---

Anyone married to a female knows that the "chatting" is completely different on almost every level.

tl/dr version - women talk too much, it's best that they talk with each other

quote:

---

I can’t agree with the men don’t chat part though, or maybe I’m an exception but they do come to chat with me and these aren’t gay guys.

---

The difference is that male chat has nothing to do with positive feedback for emotional support. IE, if I ask you 'how about that LSU game last night' your response is not going to lift my self esteem.
OTOH, if a woman tells a female co-worker "I don't know what to do with my hair" she gets "Oooh, I wish I had hair like yours. All you need to do is add a little hair enhancer. It's terrific."

"Feminists hate Men"...because they resent the heretofore superior power of Men. Men are physically stronger, smarter re abstract-based Sciences (generalization) and apt to act in a calculated fashion, while Women are more Feeling-based in their action.

Feminists act on their Feeling...Ego...power. Or as my Wife says..."it's all about control".

The problem for Feminists is that their 'Control/Manipulate' (biological) inclination may not serve them well in particular societal collapse scenarios; scenarios of the which their societally corrosive Ideology promotes. Such being because the 'kind' of man that they would approve of...would be ill-qualified/able to defend their (weaker) Woman when the agreed-upon societal 'rules' are gone. In fact such a (feeling-based) man might be more inclined to cry on their shoulder, than to step up with muscle and heat.

Darwin's survival of the fit(est) will rule this realm; at least or until true (Truth) wisdom and Knowledge replace it. And that will likely be in the Good Lord's "kingdom not of this World".

I know...*sexist*.

quote:

---

As the son grew she saw his emotional weaknesses and was careful to nurture him into a respectable man.

---

Yep, Mother Nature at work, Z. A Mother would be inclined to create a feeling-based (love) bond with their Son, because such would be survival/prosperity efficient as She aged, and became relatively un-empowered. Heck, in some societies they don't want girls, only boys (China, I think, maybe India).

I'd hate to be a Feminist if society went dysfunctional, as it does pretty often; I suspect they've become incapable of loving the 'macho' version of Man due to a loss of respect for such. Being a woman in Venezuela...can't be good. Or El Salvador more so; watched a Doc this morn on ES...Trump's sending MS-13 back ("they are not sending their best"), and that place is hell, with the good folk getting out, and the gangstas remaining.