Started By
Message

Oxford Study: Vaccinated are 44% more likely to catch & spread Covid

Posted on 10/3/22 at 11:43 am
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 11:43 am
Not so safe and not so effective.

The real science.


The jab is garbage
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112517 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 11:43 am to
If you were a doctor in Calif. you would lose your license for posting that.
Posted by JColtF
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Aug 2008
4749 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 11:47 am to
quote:



"Oxford conducts racist study trying to suggest minorities that are vaccinated spread Covid."


Posted by the_truman_shitshow
Member since Aug 2021
2755 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 11:52 am to
We know.

Unfortunately, we are now living in a society where even though you shower people with facts, data and irrefutable evidence, they will continue to reject the truth.

So then what is the cure? I don't know at this point.
Posted by BengalOnTheBay
Member since Aug 2022
3855 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Vaccinated are 44% more likely to catch & spread Covid


That's what happens when you take a "vaccine" that destroys your immune system.
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
6199 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:01 pm to
"vaccinated" have been over represented in my workplace in terms of going out for Rona.

Propensity to test might be a cause.
But, it surely makes me wonder.
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
7956 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:03 pm to
The entirety of the OT Lounge



Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
12027 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:05 pm to
Brandon is human definition of MALARKEY.

Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5845 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Not so safe and not so effective.


A lot of people that get COVID don’t know they have it vaccinated or not. How in hell do you do a study on how somebody got COVID if most people don’t know they have it vaccinated or not.

This study is bullshite

The study could come up with the right results, but no study could come with these numbers.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29826 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Oxford University researchers found that those who had taken the anti-COVID shots stood at substantially higher risk of infection with the coronavirus compared to those who had did not receive any COVID jab.


Posted by j1897
Member since Nov 2011
3569 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

A high BMI has been associated



So most of this board is screwed. You also suck at reading OP.
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
12027 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:09 pm to
Those mankind inserted Spike proteins are bad motor scooters.

Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11585 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

A lot of people that get COVID don’t know they have it vaccinated or not. How in hell do you do a study on how somebody got COVID if most people don’t know they have it vaccinated or not.

This study is bullshite

The study could come up with the right results, but no study could come with these numbers.



If folks actually read the study that's being cited, this is not what was being studied and the results are not what this "source" is presenting. But what do you expect from a source that prints this:

quote:

Oxford University researchers found that those who had taken the anti-COVID shots stood at substantially higher risk of infection with the coronavirus compared to those who had did not receive any COVID jab.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71191 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:11 pm to
I can't find the Twitter feed for Oxford. Did they get deplatformed?
Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11585 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

So most of this board is screwed. You also suck at reading OP.


I mean, the person who wrote this tripe also made this statement :

quote:

The results for effectiveness against positive COVID test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown below.


These people don't even understand how research studies are conducted and all the data that gets compiled within them. Guess they wanted it in the first page or two....
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5845 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

If folks actually read the study that's being cited, this is not what was being studied and the results are not what this "source" is presenting. But what do you expect from a source that prints this:


Don’t need to read the entire study. Any numbers they come up with can not be proven with any type of science.

If you don’t know who gave it to you or who has it how do you come up with any numbers.

Most studies that deal with COVID are the same way. Unless every single person got the shot and every single person was tested every week It couldn’t be accurate.

I got COVID from a 3 year who was messing around with drink, or his dad I was drinking with, or one of his other kids running around in my house, and maybe they gave it to one of my kids that gave it to me.

How would you know. Maybe they all had COVID and only one tested positive.
This post was edited on 10/3/22 at 12:27 pm
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11166 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:26 pm to
I said it before and I’ll say it again. The people that held out against the masks and vaxes are the real heroes here. Government overreach is out of control.
Remember that when they start pushing digital currency and electric cars. It’s not more efficient, it’s just a more efficient way to control you.

Freedom is more important than safety
This post was edited on 10/3/22 at 6:51 pm
Posted by SquaringCircles
Member since Sep 2021
1466 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:38 pm to
The hypothesis that introducing the immune system to the spike protein alone would confer immunity, or any sort of robust protection, against coronaviruses has been disproved in the largest clinical trial ever conducted (Covid-19 and the real world), but there is too much money and too much pride at stake for many to admit. In addition, the science continues to accumulate that the spike protein itself has negative impacts, from crossing the blood brain barrier to cause cognitive effects to infiltrating the cell nucleus and interfering with DNA repair. But it’s become an article of faith, and science has bet the house on it.
Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11585 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Don’t need to read the entire study. Any numbers they come up with can not be proven with any type of science.

If you don’t know who gave it to you or who has it how do you come up with any numbers.


I am in agreement with you. There will always be too many unknowns. Just pointing out that what they did say/do here wasn't what OP presented.
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 10/3/22 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

A lot of people that get COVID don’t know they have it vaccinated or not. How in hell do you do a study on how somebody got COVID if most people don’t know they have it vaccinated or not.

This study is bullshite


"Among 9?171?524 participants (mean age 52 [SD 19] years; BMI 26·7 [5·6] kg/m2), 566?461 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during follow-up, of whom 32?808 were admitted to hospital and 14?389 died. Of the total study sample, 19·2% (1?758?689) were unvaccinated, 3·1% (287?246) had one vaccine dose, 52·6% (4?828?327) had two doses, and 25·0% (2?297?262) had three doses. In people aged 40 years and older, uptake of two or three vaccine doses was more than 80% among people with overweight or obesity, which was slightly lower in people with underweight (70–83%). Although significant heterogeneity was found across BMI groups, protection against severe COVID-19 disease (comparing people who were vaccinated vs those who were not) was high after 14 days or more from the second dose for hospital admission (underweight: OR 0·51 [95% CI 0·41–0·63]; healthy weight: 0·34 [0·32–0·36]; overweight: 0·32 [0·30–0·34]; and obesity: 0·32 [0·30–0·34]) and death (underweight: 0·60 [0·36–0·98]; healthy weight: 0·39 [0·33–0·47]; overweight: 0·30 [0·25–0·35]; and obesity: 0·26 [0·22–0·30]). In the vaccinated cohort, there were significant linear associations between BMI and COVID-19 hospitalisation and death after the first dose, and J-shaped associations after the second dose."

QResearch= General practice &/or hospital records...
at the least that smears the "it would've been worse if you weren't vaccinated!" rhetoric. Maybe you didn't care for the 9M sample size?
This post was edited on 10/3/22 at 1:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram