Started By
Message

re: Our President wants you to know that our planes have become too complicated

Posted on 3/12/19 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by BigAppleBucky
New York
Member since Jan 2014
1807 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 4:44 pm to
Yep, he's the stable genius alright.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38521 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 4:57 pm to
So his point is that Boeing is at fault? That seems like a lousy thing to rush to say when we are fighting a trade war with China (and really Europe also). He should STFU and learn something.

And that's on top of the fact that planes are infinitely safer than they have ever been.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24147 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 4:58 pm to
As a former aero engineer, he ain't wrong.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38521 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

As a former aero engineer, he ain't wrong.
What exactly is he "right" about? Planes are safer than they'v ever been - despite becoming evidently too "complicated". Is he asserting that the humans have just done a remarkable job of stretching themselves to keep up with this complication?

Much more likely is he is full of shite.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:06 pm to




Let's go back to the good ole days!

Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Yep, he's the stable genius alright.


Right idea. Wrong end of the horse, though.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35133 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:08 pm to
I mean, he ain't wrong.
Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
2352 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:44 pm to
Ignorant statement by Feith. At this point in the investigations no one knows what automation was engaged or not in either the Atlas or Ethiopian crashes.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109737 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Let's go back to the good ole days!



That Kennah?
Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
2352 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 6:02 pm to
I agree that there are times a pilot is not getting the aircraft’s auto flight and nav systems to do what they intend. But if it’s happening frequently then I’d say the issue is the pilot’s training and experience are insufficient for the level of aircraft he/she is operating.

And I know of no aircraft - general, commercial or military - where one cannot instantly cut off the autopilot and hand fly.

But precisely hand-flying a complex high performance jet in a busy airspace is a demanding skill set. Skill levels most certainly vary across the world’s commercial operators.

In the US our commercial pilots are very capable of operating the 737 NGs and MAXs safely and proficiently. The same has been proven to not be as true for Lion. And since we have no Idea what happened in the Ethiopian crash we’ll have to wait and see. I do know the First Officer in the Ethiopian incident only had around 200 flight hours...far far less than any US operator would employ, and not even close to the 1500 hours minimum to hold a US FAA ATP certificate.
Posted by cajuncarguy
On the road...Again!
Member since Jun 2013
3135 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Wait till drive-by-wire cars become mainstream and those things are driving people off cliffs.


Or autonomous cars. Somebody hacks in and tell every other car "Left turn Clyde!"
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

That Kennah?


Yep.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84992 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

As a former aero engineer, he ain't wrong.
I like all these jerkoffs downvoting pilots and aviation type people.
Posted by Sayre
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Nov 2011
5754 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

He's got a point. The 737 airframe is 50+ years old, and they're trying to squeeze a giant pair of engines on it that are so large, they can't even be mounted under the wings, and have to hang forward.

This is what caused the need for the MCAS in the first place; the pilots can't control the aircraft without software assistance.

737-200: Not even the first version, but you can see the difference..



737-MAX8





This post right here is the perfect example of how this board if filled with people who have absolutely zero knowledge on a subject yet they don't know anything.

Those two engines work in different ways. The top one, a turbojet, with the thin body gets all it's thrust from the turbines and the engine itself, whereas the bottom engine, a turbofan, gets most of it's thrust from the big fan and the bypass ratio. It's much more powerful and efficient than the older design.

Those engines do nothing at all detrimental to those planes.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

This post right here is the perfect example of how this board if filled with people who have absolutely zero knowledge on a subject yet they don't know anything.


quote:

Those engines do nothing at all detrimental to those planes.


To provide adequate ground clearance when mounting the larger engines on the 737, they were mounted higher and moved further forward, they were also heavier than the engines the plane was originally designed for. This caused a shift in the planes center of gravity and altered the airflow over the wing. During flight testing it was revealed the new engines caused the plane to pitch up in certain conditions.

In other words converting to the bigger engines was "detrimental" to this plane, and as the previous posted has said resulted in the addition of the MCAS system to automatically pitch the nose of the plane down when excessive angle of attack was detected.


LINK
This post was edited on 3/12/19 at 8:28 pm
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:06 pm to
quote:


This post right here is the perfect example of how this board if filled with people who have absolutely zero knowledge on a subject yet they don't know anything.

Those two engines work in different ways. The top one, a turbojet, with the thin body gets all it's thrust from the turbines and the engine itself, whereas the bottom engine, a turbofan, gets most of it's thrust from the big fan and the bypass ratio. It's much more powerful and efficient than the older design.

Those engines do nothing at all detrimental to those planes.


frick you libtard!!!
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

Computer error is far less frequent than human error, and our air travel has never been safer because of it. Trump badly misses the mark here.


There's a balance.

Airbus A320 Test Flight Crashes With Test Pilot On Board

That balance is out of balance.

"The preliminary report into the Oct. 29 of a Lion Air Boeing 737 MAX 8 crash confirms that the pilots struggled with the automatic trim as it responded to faulty inputs"

LINK

Same thing likely brought down the Ethopian 737 MAX a few days ago.
Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
2352 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:44 pm to
You got a link to where anyone has proof what brought down the Ethiopian jet, and it was MCAS/new auto trim?

And as for the Lion jet there are four different ways to overcome a faulty MCAS. All four can be accomplished in less than 10 seconds. That fault did not take the jet down. The pilots inability to deal with a problem that is easily and quickly solvable did. As I said above, Lion is not one of the world’s sterling operators.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27132 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 1:37 am to
of course he would believe the safest form of travel is complicated and dangerous.

I'm not surprised that this is too complex for him to understand.
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
6300 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 6:06 am to
I'm surprised at how many people agree with him.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram