- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/12/19 at 4:57 pm to bamarep
So his point is that Boeing is at fault? That seems like a lousy thing to rush to say when we are fighting a trade war with China (and really Europe also). He should STFU and learn something.
And that's on top of the fact that planes are infinitely safer than they have ever been.
And that's on top of the fact that planes are infinitely safer than they have ever been.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 4:58 pm to bamarep
As a former aero engineer, he ain't wrong.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:00 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:What exactly is he "right" about? Planes are safer than they'v ever been - despite becoming evidently too "complicated". Is he asserting that the humans have just done a remarkable job of stretching themselves to keep up with this complication?
As a former aero engineer, he ain't wrong.
Much more likely is he is full of shite.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:06 pm to bamarep
Let's go back to the good ole days!

Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:07 pm to BigAppleBucky
quote:
Yep, he's the stable genius alright.
Right idea. Wrong end of the horse, though.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:44 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Ignorant statement by Feith. At this point in the investigations no one knows what automation was engaged or not in either the Atlas or Ethiopian crashes.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 5:47 pm to cwill
quote:
Let's go back to the good ole days!
That Kennah?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 6:02 pm to FredsGotSlacks
I agree that there are times a pilot is not getting the aircraft’s auto flight and nav systems to do what they intend. But if it’s happening frequently then I’d say the issue is the pilot’s training and experience are insufficient for the level of aircraft he/she is operating.
And I know of no aircraft - general, commercial or military - where one cannot instantly cut off the autopilot and hand fly.
But precisely hand-flying a complex high performance jet in a busy airspace is a demanding skill set. Skill levels most certainly vary across the world’s commercial operators.
In the US our commercial pilots are very capable of operating the 737 NGs and MAXs safely and proficiently. The same has been proven to not be as true for Lion. And since we have no Idea what happened in the Ethiopian crash we’ll have to wait and see. I do know the First Officer in the Ethiopian incident only had around 200 flight hours...far far less than any US operator would employ, and not even close to the 1500 hours minimum to hold a US FAA ATP certificate.
And I know of no aircraft - general, commercial or military - where one cannot instantly cut off the autopilot and hand fly.
But precisely hand-flying a complex high performance jet in a busy airspace is a demanding skill set. Skill levels most certainly vary across the world’s commercial operators.
In the US our commercial pilots are very capable of operating the 737 NGs and MAXs safely and proficiently. The same has been proven to not be as true for Lion. And since we have no Idea what happened in the Ethiopian crash we’ll have to wait and see. I do know the First Officer in the Ethiopian incident only had around 200 flight hours...far far less than any US operator would employ, and not even close to the 1500 hours minimum to hold a US FAA ATP certificate.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 6:05 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Wait till drive-by-wire cars become mainstream and those things are driving people off cliffs.
Or autonomous cars. Somebody hacks in and tell every other car "Left turn Clyde!"
Posted on 3/12/19 at 6:58 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:I like all these jerkoffs downvoting pilots and aviation type people.
As a former aero engineer, he ain't wrong.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 8:01 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
He's got a point. The 737 airframe is 50+ years old, and they're trying to squeeze a giant pair of engines on it that are so large, they can't even be mounted under the wings, and have to hang forward.
This is what caused the need for the MCAS in the first place; the pilots can't control the aircraft without software assistance.
737-200: Not even the first version, but you can see the difference..
737-MAX8
This post right here is the perfect example of how this board if filled with people who have absolutely zero knowledge on a subject yet they don't know anything.
Those two engines work in different ways. The top one, a turbojet, with the thin body gets all it's thrust from the turbines and the engine itself, whereas the bottom engine, a turbofan, gets most of it's thrust from the big fan and the bypass ratio. It's much more powerful and efficient than the older design.
Those engines do nothing at all detrimental to those planes.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 8:20 pm to Sayre
quote:
This post right here is the perfect example of how this board if filled with people who have absolutely zero knowledge on a subject yet they don't know anything.
quote:
Those engines do nothing at all detrimental to those planes.
To provide adequate ground clearance when mounting the larger engines on the 737, they were mounted higher and moved further forward, they were also heavier than the engines the plane was originally designed for. This caused a shift in the planes center of gravity and altered the airflow over the wing. During flight testing it was revealed the new engines caused the plane to pitch up in certain conditions.
In other words converting to the bigger engines was "detrimental" to this plane, and as the previous posted has said resulted in the addition of the MCAS system to automatically pitch the nose of the plane down when excessive angle of attack was detected.
LINK
This post was edited on 3/12/19 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:06 pm to Sayre
quote:
This post right here is the perfect example of how this board if filled with people who have absolutely zero knowledge on a subject yet they don't know anything.
Those two engines work in different ways. The top one, a turbojet, with the thin body gets all it's thrust from the turbines and the engine itself, whereas the bottom engine, a turbofan, gets most of it's thrust from the big fan and the bypass ratio. It's much more powerful and efficient than the older design.
Those engines do nothing at all detrimental to those planes.
frick you libtard!!!
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:36 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Computer error is far less frequent than human error, and our air travel has never been safer because of it. Trump badly misses the mark here.
There's a balance.
Airbus A320 Test Flight Crashes With Test Pilot On Board
That balance is out of balance.
"The preliminary report into the Oct. 29 of a Lion Air Boeing 737 MAX 8 crash confirms that the pilots struggled with the automatic trim as it responded to faulty inputs"
LINK
Same thing likely brought down the Ethopian 737 MAX a few days ago.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:44 pm to Boatshoes
You got a link to where anyone has proof what brought down the Ethiopian jet, and it was MCAS/new auto trim?
And as for the Lion jet there are four different ways to overcome a faulty MCAS. All four can be accomplished in less than 10 seconds. That fault did not take the jet down. The pilots inability to deal with a problem that is easily and quickly solvable did. As I said above, Lion is not one of the world’s sterling operators.
And as for the Lion jet there are four different ways to overcome a faulty MCAS. All four can be accomplished in less than 10 seconds. That fault did not take the jet down. The pilots inability to deal with a problem that is easily and quickly solvable did. As I said above, Lion is not one of the world’s sterling operators.
Posted on 3/13/19 at 1:37 am to bamarep
of course he would believe the safest form of travel is complicated and dangerous.
I'm not surprised that this is too complex for him to understand.
I'm not surprised that this is too complex for him to understand.
Posted on 3/13/19 at 6:06 am to bamarep
I'm surprised at how many people agree with him.
Popular
Back to top



1






