- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ohio rep Casey Weinstein (D) takes a stand against fishing license
Posted on 3/25/22 at 11:48 am to Bearcat90
Posted on 3/25/22 at 11:48 am to Bearcat90
quote:
You don't need a fishing license to fish in a pond or lake on your own property because they can't move (although some down south know this a false statement due to hurricanes). The thinking on licensing to hunt on your own property is due in part because almost all animals are mobile and did not strictly feed / were born on your property.
That’s a valid distinction of course
1
Posted on 3/25/22 at 11:50 am to stout
I can't believe they require a fishing license.
Posted on 3/25/22 at 11:55 am to Wtodd
quote:
Hey Casey...one is a Constitutional right and one isn't....need help on which one is which? Dumb frick.
And to add to that… could you imagine the laugh you would have gotten by the founding fathers if you could go back and tell them that the government will one day require you to get a license to hunt and fish?
Even though they foretold the inevitable want to restrict and ban guns… they wouldn’t have thought that you would ever need a license to fish and hunt.
Posted on 3/25/22 at 11:59 am to stout
Hunting and fishing licenses serve their purpose by preserving resources. Maybe he wants license fees to go to preserving the 2nd.
Posted on 3/25/22 at 12:10 pm to stout
It's not a license to fish, it's a tax to fish.
Posted on 3/25/22 at 12:12 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
That’s a valid distinction of course
Pretty much anything that can move off your property is a "public resource"
You cant take frogs or turtles on private land either without permit. Because they migrate out of the area.
Fish stuck in your own pond arent going anywhere. They yours.
It at least follows logic.
This post was edited on 3/25/22 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 3/25/22 at 1:05 pm to Wtodd
Now that I think about it hunting and fishing should be a constitutional right
Posted on 3/25/22 at 1:41 pm to Bearcat90
quote:how do you figure that. it's a tax to catch our own fish, genius. we are the government we shouldn't be paying a tax to fish
the other is a privilege
Posted on 3/25/22 at 1:47 pm to stout
I see nothing wrong with it? Don't mind paying for the fishing license if the money is actually going back to ensuring the resource is sustained. There should never be a license associated with a constitutional right.
Posted on 3/25/22 at 2:23 pm to DesScorp
(no message)
Posted on 3/25/22 at 2:28 pm to stout
Say hello to my little friend! Lol!
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News