Started By
Message

re: NYTimes - US Marines arrive in the Middle East

Posted on 3/28/26 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
12146 posts
Posted on 3/28/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

They volunteer so entitled people don’t have to



Ok. Works for me.
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
12146 posts
Posted on 3/28/26 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

North Korea chants death to america and already has nukes. We also have interest in that part of the world....should we be sending troops over there too then?



Too late to do anything with them because we allowed that psycho regime to have a nuke hanging over heads which allows our national policy to be dictated taking that into account.

Can’t have another one or this in the ME
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97928 posts
Posted on 3/28/26 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

This war didnt start due to oil, the reason we got into this is because israel finally got their useful idiot in the white house


Yeah i figured you wouldnt stop being a tard

Its always been about Oil. Orange bad has been talking about it since 88
Posted by High Life
Member since Dec 2014
3820 posts
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

Ok. Works for me.


Yep they don’t mind. They kill will a smile on their face while fat joos like you hate themselves
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7909 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 6:06 am to
There are already troops in South Korea.
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
36989 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 6:33 am to
Semper Fi.

When/if the Marines land, the situation will be well in hand.
Posted by 2 Jugs
Saint Amant
Member since Feb 2018
2354 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 6:53 am to
quote:

israel finally got their useful idiot in the white house




Wait.

I thought PDJT was a Russian stooge.
Posted by Woolfpack
Member since Jun 2021
1715 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 7:02 am to
Halftards always want to pinpoint the issue and cannot comprehend that multiple issues are at play.

For decades Iran needed to be dealt with. The export of terrorism alone was reason to give them a thumping.

It was always going to be a challenge due to the fragility of the dirty Hormuz and effects on global oil supply.

So nobody ever had the gonads to attempt to hammer them even though they were begging for it.

Now imagine Iranian regime delivering an unabated attack on US bases in the region.

Now imagine a nuclear armed Iran attacking our bases.

They, a government that machine guns their own citizens, would have completely controlled the Persian gulf and the flow of oil. Effectively, they would have much control over the world.

And that doesn’t even include the threat to Israel which was rapidly becoming ginormous.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89724 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 7:39 am to
quote:

North Korea chants death to america and already has nukes. We also have interest in that part of the world....should we be sending troops over there too then?


Did North Korea bomb all of its neighbors and try to kill Trump?


Why aren't you calling for our soldiers to come home from Korea?


This post was edited on 3/29/26 at 7:41 am
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89724 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 7:54 am to
quote:

The point I was making to his hysterics troops heading into Mideast is that we always have troops at bases there. At this point it’s not Afghanistan, Iraq or even the 90’s Baltic issues


And the only part of the article I can read starts off with a base in Saudi being hit. So not even in Iran.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram