Started By
Message

re: Notorious ACB NEWEST SCOTUS JUDGE!!! - All We Do Is Win!! ON TO NOV 3RD!!!!

Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:26 pm to
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51746 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:26 pm to
When did it become a requirement that a Justice be replaced with someone who has the same judicial philosophy as them?
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
21828 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:26 pm to
It would have moved away from the philosophy of Ginsberg? Yeah, so fricking what a-hole. It's amazing how the left has managed to successfully frame this shite and I wish Barrett would just say 'so fricking what?'
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
5646 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:26 pm to
This bullshite of the court being a 5-4 shift is disgusting because it tells you that they know they have Roberts in their pocket.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40868 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:27 pm to
They also make the case that they, as legislators and the people themselves, would be powerless if these cases were overturned.

That's not the case at all, it just makes them do their jobs, suggest amendments to the Constitution, etc.
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17773 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

When did it become a requirement that a Justice be replaced with someone who has the same judicial philosophy as them?



Only when Democrats are not in power.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
21828 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

When did it become a requirement that a Justice be replaced with someone who has the same judicial philosophy as them?

When it became apparent there would be a conservative, originalist majority on the court. If Ginsberg had died while a D was in the white house, you'd never hear the word 'balance' in these hearings.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77947 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

When did it become a requirement that a Justice be replaced with someone who has the same judicial philosophy as them?


Since they realized that Americans won't support their real ideology or policies. They will have to force it on us, and that has been their intention for years. They are pissed that their plan for a complete takeover is being slowed.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
21828 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

That's not the case at all, it just makes them do their jobs, suggest amendments to the Constitution, etc.

Right, but passing legislation would require them to actually state a position and support it via a vote, and they can't have that. They'd rather cede their Constitutional responsibility to the courts because they are cowards.
Posted by jts1207
Member since Apr 2018
928 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:30 pm to
She is absolutely destroying these idiots
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77947 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:31 pm to
Boom!
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17773 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:31 pm to
Her intelligence is on a completely different level than these morons.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42475 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:31 pm to
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23008 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:32 pm to
Coons: Why do you think it's ok to disregard precedent if you disagree with something.
ACB: I'm sure you would agree with overturning Precedent as done in Lawrence v Texas?
Coons: Yes, I agree with overturning precedent in grievously decided cases.

ACB just eviscerated him.
Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
13049 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

When did it become a requirement that a Justice be replaced with someone who has the same judicial philosophy as them


Fkn This!

She should have asked Coons, is it a requirement to replace a justice with someone that is identical? If so, dud you want Scalia Replaced with Scalia?
Posted by neardeath
Rocket City
Member since Jul 2014
108 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:33 pm to
ACB has handled herself like a champ
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51746 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:34 pm to
I’ll give Coons this, he at least tries to come across as a nice person.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77947 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

I’ll give Coons this, he at least tries to come across as a nice person.


He is nice. He even lets other politicians sniff and try to kiss his daughter.
Posted by TigerAlum01
Lower Alabama
Member since May 2020
126 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:36 pm to
Yes, he just nicely told her that he would be voting against her confirmation. Shocking!
Posted by HamzooReb
Utah
Member since Mar 2013
13895 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:37 pm to
That guy is a cuck
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24922 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Yes, he just nicely told her that he would be voting against her confirmation. Shocking!


Hahaha like anyone gives a $hit...
first pageprev pagePage 143 of 227Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram