- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Notable Epstein Accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre Dies by "Suicide"
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:22 am to blueboy
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:22 am to blueboy
quote:
She named Prince Andrew and another guy. She settled with Andrew, and the other guy 'killed himself' in jail.
By all accounts this was all the info she had.
quote:
against any new defendants, dumbass, not Maxwell.
She doesn't appear to have info on these mythical defendants. That's the whole point.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:25 am to Rebel
quote:
Was Andrew ever cuffed and perp walked?
The original depositions were in 2016. The Trump admin had 4 years to make that call prior to Biden taking over in 2021.
If they didn't have enough to make a case 2017-2020, why do y'all think that they would somehow make it in 2025 and onward?
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You havent proven a single point and have made a complete fool of yourself.
It's not a deflection. Your standard is unreasonable and you're beating your chest like an ape thinking by using that unreasonable standard you proved some point.
I'm showing that you, in fact, did not.
quote:So you dropped the 5.5 years ago makes the tweet irrelevant comment and have moved on to being certain about what you espouse?
Says the guy who won't defend his own standards ITT
You are such a disingenuous little shite.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You have zero clue what she knew.
By all accounts this was all the info she had.
quote:so Epstein didnt have any other clients? They will not face any prosecution? You dont know the answer for certain because you are full of shite. As usual
She doesn't appear to have info on these mythical defendants. That's the whole point.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:35 am to AuburnTigers
Hes the board pedo/sex trafficking apologist. Let him be.
Theres a very good chance he wanks the entire time he posts about this stuff too.
Theres a very good chance he wanks the entire time he posts about this stuff too.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:39 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
So you dropped the 5.5 years ago makes the tweet irrelevant comment and have moved on to being certain about what you espouse?
I noticed that too.
I mean, that message is at least a little bit relevant.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The original depositions were in 2016. The Trump admin had 4 years to make that call prior to Biden taking over in 2021.
If they didn't have enough to make a case 2017-2020, why do y'all think that they would somehow make it in 2025 and onward?
This board will hate you for pointing this out, but this is where we are.
We were played, then played again by Bondi.
NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN
The US is Isreal's bitch.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:45 am to Azkiger
quote:Her being a mother of three would also be relevant.
I mean, that message is at least a little bit relevant.
So this woman who tweets she is not suicidal, has three kids, spent decades living with this trauma and never killed herself, suddenly kills herself after all this time and leaves her children behind. Yeah fricking right
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:52 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
You havent proven a single point
Only based on your unreasonable standards.
You cannot make any points with that standard, either.
quote:
and have made a complete fool of yourself.
Says the guy running from defending his stances
quote:
So you dropped the 5.5 years ago makes the tweet irrelevant comment a
No. Nobody has given any logical reason to refute my points so the discussion is over.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:knowing what you are talking about is unreasonable
Only based on your unreasonable standards.
quote:Projection again from you. 5.5 years still irrelevant?
Says the guy running from defending his stances
quote:White fricking flag post.
Nobody has given any logical reason to refute my points so the discussion is over.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:53 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
You have zero clue what she knew.
We literally have her deposition
quote:
so Epstein didnt have any other clients?
This is a leap of logic.
Nobody is arguing that. The point is what she knew about these other clients, which doesn't appear to be much. Hence, her death should not be linked to any conspiracy relating to these other clients.
quote:
They will not face any prosecution?
Who knows if they will. The ones she had info on were sued, prosecuted, or both.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:54 am to Azkiger
quote:
that message is at least a little bit relevant.
Why is it relevant to 2025?
Posted on 4/26/25 at 8:55 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
knowing what you are talking about is unreasonable
You're pivoting.
Again, can't even keep your argument consistent.
quote:
Projection again from you. 5.5 years still irrelevant?
Yes
quote:
White fricking flag post.
Yes, for those who failed to give a refutation (like you).
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:So you are in full deny deny deny mode. Why was the tweet relevant in 2025? She committed suicide and the tweet said she wasnt suicidal
SlowFlowPro
If you cant find the relevance in that, then you are devoid of intellect, logic and wisdom. Just a contrarian high on his own bullshite
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:01 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
Why was the tweet relevant in 2025?
It's not relevant in 2025
quote:
She committed suicide and the tweet said she wasnt suicidal
She didn't commit suicide with any temporal or causal relationship to the tweet.
quote:
If you cant find the relevance in that, then you are devoid of intellect, logic and wisdom. Just a contrarian high on his own bullshite
I ask, and, yet again, you can't give any logical argument.
You claim victory without any substance yet again.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:02 am to AuburnTigers
He's a lawyer who denies the existence/relevance of sealed indictments which were filed at a higher than normal level during the Trump 45 term that have yet to be acted upon/unsealed.
We're in the midst of the biggest sting operation in the history of the world and the contrarians literally can't even.
We're in the midst of the biggest sting operation in the history of the world and the contrarians literally can't even.
This post was edited on 4/26/25 at 9:06 am
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:already been given. You just arent capable
ask, and, yet again, you can't give any logical argument.
quote:Ive dragged my nuts all over your face in this thread. Youve admitted to not knowing for certain what you are talking about, then saying knowing what you are talking about is an unreasonable standard for you
You claim victory without any substance yet again.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:07 am to VoxDawg
quote:I dont believe this for a second. He spends entirely too much time on this site to be a lawyer of any repute. SFP is a runner or some low level assistant. Zero chance he has passed the BAR
He's a lawyer
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:They have a deposition regarding the activities of Epstein and Maxwell. In no way does that mean everything she knows about everyone everywhere has been recorded.
We literally have her deposition
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:12 am to VoxDawg
quote:
He's a lawyer who denies the existence/relevance of sealed indictments
No I don't.
They're not going to be able to rely on a sealed indictment that never is unsealed for 9 years, bubba.
quote:
We're in the midst of the biggest sting operation in the history of the world
Popular
Back to top



1




