No! The real irony is.................

quote:

---

I would love to hear about the last improper police shooting that involved a white male without mental problems (the last qualification is because the cops DO hate crazy people without regard to race).

---

Irrelevant to this thread

quote:

---

I would love to hear about the last improper police shooting that involved a white male without mental problems (the last qualification is because the cops DO hate crazy people without regard to race). 

---

Impeccable reading comperhension. Not the point of the OP.

In reference to the OP, most of the $ comes from the feds specifically to buy this military style shite, the feds sell it to them ridiculously cheap, or the feds just give it away. What police department wouldn't take free stuff?

A lot of that military hardware is given to them by the federal government. The pentagon said they gave out $500 million in hardware and grants to local and state police forces just last year.

Remember Obama saying in 2008 that "we can't continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we have set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

Here's a LINK to a video describing how the federal government has been building a domestic army with standardized equipment, tactics, and training.

quote:

---

I would love to hear about the last improper police shooting that involved a white male without mental problems

---

Improper police shooting?

Yeah, that poor little ghetto lad and his friends are just all victims --



Good thing you haven't jumped to any conclusions.


And, the irony of your statement is that EVEN IF there is an "improper police shooting that involved a white male" you'd never hear about it because your Komrades in the Mainstream Media won't give a sh!t and they wouldn't have the faces of the Rev-uh-runds Al and Jesse to stick a camera in front of.

quote:

---

A lot of that military hardware is given to them by the federal government. The pentagon said they gave out $500 million in hardware and grants to local and state police forces just last year. Remember Obama saying in 2008 that "we can't continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we have set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." Here's a LINK to a video describing how the federal government has been building a domestic army with standardized equipment, tactics, and training.

---

Yeah I remember which makes the militarization of local law enforcement really disturbing, if we need local police this heavily armed sh!t's fixin to get real serious. Generally not into NWO/Alex Jones sh!t but the past few years have made me wonder if some of his rants are not unfounded.

Gang affiliation alone doesn't justify shooting an unarmed civilian.

quote:

---

JoeMoTiger

---

So you are not gonna respond to the statements that point out you were wrong in your OP?

quote:

---

Gang affiliation alone doesn't justify shooting an unarmed civilian.

---

Definitely agree.

However, putting that information out there, does a decent job of counterbalancing the media trying to portray someone as an ideal law abiding citizen.

On either end of the scale, you're trying to influence perception one way or the other. If you just let the media put up picture of a guy when he's clean cut, smiling, etc... you are lighting a fire underneath an already angry, unstable group of people.

quote:

---

What it does do is offer some counter to the narrative in the media of a "choir boy".

---

And I think this isn't necessarily irrelevant, but it's a very weak ancillary point. Very few people, imo, would pass a "choir boy" test. I hate the term "innocent". When I defend a client in a criminal matter, I don't want the judge or jury to see the person, but the action. The actions are what determine guilty or not guilty.

We shouldn't be looking at who Brown was, but rather what he did at that particular moment. Did his actions justify the police taking his life? That's the question.