- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No Documentary evidence??
Posted on 6/18/18 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 6/18/18 at 2:57 pm
quote:
WASHINGTON — Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz defended his scathing review of the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, maintaining Monday that there was no "documentary evidence" that political bias affected investigative decision
It appears to me that it says = "We did not find any documents that admitted to a conspiracy, nor did we intercept any wiretaps where they heard them discuss the specifics of a conspiracy."
Certainly the trail of evidence points out that there was a political bias, but nobody was foolish enough to detail the specifics of the conspiracy to paper in a way that it could be discovered.
3
Posted on 6/18/18 at 2:59 pm to ChineseBandit58
Solid assessment but this "conclusion" by Horowitz gave the media and the Dems exactly what they wanted out of this. They can run one liners like you quoted and completely disregard all of the horror of the remaining 500 pages.
Posted on 6/18/18 at 3:01 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
Horowitz gave the media and the Dems exactly what they wanted
Exactly - he gave them their one-liner and they can ignore the whole ball of wax - returning that that one statement as their "last word."
Pisses me off.
Posted on 6/18/18 at 3:04 pm to DallasTiger11
No... he didn't. You are not listening to him.
They stated he did not have Political Bias in July. THEY DID in Oct.
He literally just stated that all evidence they had pointed to bias.. The only evidence they had to the opposite was the words of those agents involved
They stated he did not have Political Bias in July. THEY DID in Oct.
He literally just stated that all evidence they had pointed to bias.. The only evidence they had to the opposite was the words of those agents involved
Posted on 6/18/18 at 3:09 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
No... he didn't. You are not listening to him.
They stated he did not have Political Bias in July. THEY DID in Oct.
He literally just stated that all evidence they had pointed to bias.. The only evidence they had to the opposite was the words of those agents involved
I don't know what you are talking about.
No one is watching this crap today.
The narrative was set last week. No political bias in Clinton investigation.
Posted on 6/18/18 at 3:13 pm to ChineseBandit58
Heard some idiot on NPR this morning saying that the report proved that "there was no bias." Of course, the NPR reporter didn't correct him that is not correct him. Such irresponsible journalism. It's like saying OJ didn't kill Nicole.
Posted on 6/18/18 at 3:16 pm to ChineseBandit58
Graham put it best:
"Director Wray have you ever prosecuted and won a case based on circumstantial evidence?"
Wray: "Yes."
"Director Wray have you ever prosecuted and won a case based on circumstantial evidence?"
Wray: "Yes."
Posted on 6/18/18 at 3:26 pm to AUstar
quote:
Graham put it best:
Graham's takedown should be required reading - Trump should hod a national press conference - even purchase time on all the MSM outlets so they will be forced to cover it.
The MSM is going to go with the 'no bias' statement as the be-all, end-all conclusion in their narrative to the public.
SO disappointed Horowitz gave them that out.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News