- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nine Other Current And Former Mexican Government Officials Indicted With Sinaloa Governor
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:00 am to the808bass
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:00 am to the808bass
quote:
No, it’s not.
Your position is that the CIA wasn’t picking winners in the cartel wars?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:06 am to tide06
quote:
Your position is that the CIA wasn’t picking winners in the cartel wars?
Picking winners is very different than creating cartels or drug demand.
I’m not in favor of either.
But the CIA didn’t create the cartels or drug demand.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:23 am to tide06
quote:
but the real objective to me would be decoupling Mexico from the globalists and Chinese.
We know thatthe Mexican government is heavily influenced/bought/pressured by the drug cartels. I speculate the Mexican government also faces the same pressures from China.
China isn't morally superior to the cartels and would have no problem "helping out" the cartels if it benefits China. IMHO
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:32 am to the808bass
quote:
Picking winners is very different than creating cartels or drug demand.
I’m not in favor of either.
But the CIA didn’t create the cartels or drug demand.
As early as the 80s the CIA and DEA were choosing which cartels were going to be backed and which were selected to be eliminated dominate based on their willingness to work with us on various issues. Based on interviews I've heard from former CIA personnel like John Kirakou they didnt care at all about the domestic consequences, only how it impacted their ability to achieve their foreign policy aims in the various markets they were focused on whether it was Afghanistan where we were protecting poppy farms or Columbia where we were worried about communist rebels.
And I would argue that the cartels we chose to be winners then flooded certain markets with new products like crack (black inner cities) and fentanyl (rural areas) in effect creating new markets where none previously existed.
Decapitating the cartels regardless of how they became dominant in and of itself will not fix the larger domestic issues surrounding drug abuse, but I understand it as a tool in a larger exercise intended to achieve specific political aims in Mexico or Central and America. To win the battle on drug abuse will take more than bombs and special forces raids unfortunately.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:35 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
China isn't morally superior to the cartels and would have no problem "helping out" the cartels if it benefits China. IMHO
They already are by supplying precursor chemicals used in many drugs processed in Mexico.
quote:
On the other hand, China is "the primary source country for illicit fentanyl precursor chemicals and pill pressing equipment," according to the U.S. intelligence community's March 2025 Annual Threat Assessment. China's massive chemical and pharmaceutical industries make the PRC a primary supplier not only of precursors for fentanyl, but also for illicit drugs including methamphetamine, ketamine, and nitazenes. Because of the PRC's role as a supplier of precursors, the President has designated China a major illicit drug producing or drug transit country since 2023, following Congress' 2022 amendment (P.L. 117-263) of the definition to include synthetic drugs and their precursors.
Congress.gov/Chinas Role in Drug Manufacturing
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:50 am to laxtonto
quote:
Sounds like one or more of the big fish that have already been caught flipped. The problem is that if you are helping to lead a cartel faction, what bigger fish can you flip on?
What about the whole government in the region is all in my pocket and I have means to prove it? Yeah, that will get you the chance to see daylight some day….
El Mayo is THE big fish and he turned himself in months ago. He has been paying all of them for decades. I would bet this is his doing. Betcha he knows all the ones in Mexico City as well and has receipts.
I wonder if we will hear about those politicians on our side of the border. Its naive to think they give 100s of millions to politicians south of the border and none in their primary market.
And you can bet ole Carlos Slim is involved. He owns the largest bank, he owns the telephone company as well as others in SW US and all of central America. He is the single largest benefactor of an open criminalized border.
Popular
Back to top

1





