Started By
Message

NIH funds studies re: potential effects of C19 vaccination on menstrual cycles

Posted on 9/3/21 at 8:57 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 8:57 am
LINK

Probably nothing. Right?

quote:

The National Institutes of Health has awarded one-year supplemental grants totaling $1.67 million to five institutions to explore potential links between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual changes. Some women have reported experiencing irregular or missing menstrual periods, bleeding that is heavier than usual, and other menstrual changes after receiving COVID-19 vaccines.

The new awards support research to determine whether such changes may be linked to COVID-19 vaccination itself and how long the changes last. Researchers also will seek to clarify the mechanisms underlying potential vaccine-related menstrual changes
This post was edited on 9/3/21 at 9:03 am
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
9215 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 8:59 am to
On what?
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
6149 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:00 am to
My aunt said if she had a daughter she wouldn't trust these "vaccines".

She doesn't have a daughter though.
She has no kids.
Experimental drugs in the 70s turned her sterile.

Assuming no long term effects exist after a year of human trials is nuts.
Posted by whiskey over ice
Member since Sep 2020
3251 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:00 am to
I haven’t had a period since getting vaxxed. Glad they’re doing research on what I’ve long suspected as the cause
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:01 am to
Sorry. It cut off. I’ll edit.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:01 am to
How about they go back to studying vaccinated persons who get Covid. Seems pretty important. People’s lives are at risk
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51488 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:02 am to
I brought this up a month ago. Some took it seriously, others scoffed.

How many news outlets will be reporting this over the next few weeks? Months? During Breast Cancer Awareness Month?


I won't hold my breath waiting to see those reports.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:03 am to
If my daughter has complications due to her mandated vaccine, I might start a fire. Metaphorically.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
36703 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:05 am to
bass my daughter was mandated by her internship employer St. Jude to take it as well. I'll be asking questions. Well more questions.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:06 am to
Yeah. My daughter is in med school and already had Covid.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:08 am to
It’s been noted a few times in people I’ve seen, anecdotally. Doesn’t seem to impact fertility in any meaningful way.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
36703 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:10 am to
bass mine had covid as well. THAT'S honestly what pissed me off the most about being "mandated".
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15748 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Some women have reported experiencing irregular or missing menstrual periods, bleeding that is heavier than usual, and other menstrual changes after receiving COVID-19 vaccines.


^money for menstruating women, but no study documenting the changes for menstruating men.

This cannot stand. Should be equal. This funding is anti-trans and anti-non-binary.

The fascists must be held accountable.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
36703 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:11 am to
Not trying to argue but have enough women taken it who were trying to conceive to even know that yet? It's an honest question.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78920 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:13 am to
quote:

I haven’t had a period since getting vaxxed.


How long is that?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51488 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:18 am to
quote:

It’s been noted a few times in people I’ve seen, anecdotally. Doesn’t seem to impact fertility in any meaningful way.


Thalidomide says what?
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:24 am to
There was an NEJM article in pregnant patients that found no increased rate of miscarriage over baseline.

The vaccine has been out since December 2020 for the public and the original EUA population for over a year with lots of women of childbearing age receiving the vaccine.

Anecdotally (lol), a colleague of mine was vaccinated in the first 6 weeks of conception and is about to go on maternity leave now- due to deliver soon.

Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
36703 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:26 am to
I guess my question is do we know how it affects GETTING pregnant? Glad that it hasn't been shown to cause miscarriage thus far. All I have are anecdotal stories of two girls in the same circle of friends having miscarriage and they had taken the vaccine. Just not sure if before conception or after.
This post was edited on 9/3/21 at 9:27 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51488 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Not trying to argue but have enough women taken it who were trying to conceive to even know that yet? It's an honest question.


That's part of the problem with this rush to vaccinate everyone, there were no long-term studies done before slapping it into almost 2/3 of our population before any test subjects had had it long enough to determine if there is infertility issues or not.

Not knowing if there are issues means also not knowing how long it would take for any issues to manifest. Would any such issues be temporary or permanent?

I made a smart-assed comment to Tiguar about Thalidomide but it's actually a salient point for this question as during that time drugs weren't routinely tested against pregnancy. The Thalidomide incident is why the FDA now does pregnancy-related testing during the normal approval process. The average time for approval is 10-12 years with a lot of that being that the various phases are done sequentially instead of concurrently so that possible negative impacts which only appear in the long term can be uncovered.

We've completely skipped this for these COVID "vaccines". They have all done concurrent testing on millions of people and are attempting to equate that quantity of testing as being equal to the quality of time. It's not and that rush is why we've had multiple changing narratives on their efficacy over the last year.

The rush into vaccinations, to me, is a far greater danger than the disease itself.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 9:30 am to
Nothing has really been detected with respect to that but it hasn’t been specifically assessed.

Personally, I think it’s a good idea to avoid trying to get pregnant until about a month or so after receiving any vaccine just because your immune system is on high alert.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram