- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:13 pm to Ripley
there is no way he took this case without getting some percentage of the payout
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:14 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’m going to say under.
I’ll say $1.5 million aggregate from all defendants.
Who knows. With the ridiculous and uncinstitutional standard the trash scotus set, the scum in the press probably feels invincible
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:22 pm to mahdragonz
I don’t know anything about the kid’s academic trajectory but a good attorney could argue that in the current political environment on college campuses, his being falsely smeared and falsely labeled by WaPo could easily limit his ability for acceptance to colleges and universities.
A good attorney could use David Hogg as an example of the effect of media attention re a student that had their ambitions affected by the media spotlight.
David Hogg has no qualifications to go to Harvard but was offered a scholarship based on his political stances and media perception.
The same media that can send a kid with no business going to Harvard to Harvard has been completely detrimental to any secondary education prospects that Sandman might have.
A good attorney could use David Hogg as an example of the effect of media attention re a student that had their ambitions affected by the media spotlight.
David Hogg has no qualifications to go to Harvard but was offered a scholarship based on his political stances and media perception.
The same media that can send a kid with no business going to Harvard to Harvard has been completely detrimental to any secondary education prospects that Sandman might have.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:27 pm to SCLibertarian
Hate the WaPo and I hate everyone for how they treated the kids. So I ask this question just wanting specifics so I can discuss/bash thexWaPo... did they write an editorial or something? Did they have multiple articles? What did they do differently than other news outlets? (I’d love for the other outlets to be crushed too)
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:28 pm to SCLibertarian
I suggest anyone with a reddit account get to this thread and post. I’ve never seen a more obvious example of paid posters trying to downplay a story/distract/red herring
LINK /
LINK /
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:38 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Then he’ll have to beat a bunch of summary judgments.
I'd imagine he has done that before
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:38 pm to NIH
Lets hear your number
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:39 pm to boosiebadazz
$10 million
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:39 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
My number is $10 million with an NDA. Over or under?
Neither. There will be an NDA so we’ll never know.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:40 pm to SCLibertarian
Can we get a full list of the defendants?
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:40 pm to NIH
Noted and bookmarked. Should make for good shite talking down the road regardless
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:40 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
If it was a political rally that the kids were part of, then it means that the catholic school and catholic archdiocese will lose their tax except status for sponsoring this.
There could not conceivably be a more untrue statement than this.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:46 pm to Rebel
Right now it's just WaPo, but the list to whom Sandmann's lawyers sent demand letters is long (dozens of potential Defendants). There was a thread that listed them.
ETA: The NY Times, Maggie Haberman, Washington Post, CNN, NPR, Savannah Guthrie, Andrea Mitchell, Joy Reid, Chuck Todd, The Hill, The Atlantic, Kathy Griffin, GQMagazine, Elizabeth Warren, The Guardian, TMZ, Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., Diocese of Covington, Diocese of Lexington, Archdiocese of Louisville, Diocese of Baltimore, Erin Burnett, Sara Sidner, Ana Cabrera, Amanda Watts, Elliot McLaughlin, Michelle Boorstein, Emanuella Grinberg, Cleve Wootson Jr., Antonio Olivo, Joe Heim, Michael Miller, Eli Rosenberg, David Brooks, Isaac Stanley-Becker, Kristine Phillips, Sara Mervosh, Emily Rueb, Shannon Doyne, Kurt Eichenwald, Bill Maher, HBO, Warner Media, Ilhan Omar, Noah Berlatsky, Elisha Fieldstadt and Eun Kyung Kim.
ETA: The NY Times, Maggie Haberman, Washington Post, CNN, NPR, Savannah Guthrie, Andrea Mitchell, Joy Reid, Chuck Todd, The Hill, The Atlantic, Kathy Griffin, GQMagazine, Elizabeth Warren, The Guardian, TMZ, Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., Diocese of Covington, Diocese of Lexington, Archdiocese of Louisville, Diocese of Baltimore, Erin Burnett, Sara Sidner, Ana Cabrera, Amanda Watts, Elliot McLaughlin, Michelle Boorstein, Emanuella Grinberg, Cleve Wootson Jr., Antonio Olivo, Joe Heim, Michael Miller, Eli Rosenberg, David Brooks, Isaac Stanley-Becker, Kristine Phillips, Sara Mervosh, Emily Rueb, Shannon Doyne, Kurt Eichenwald, Bill Maher, HBO, Warner Media, Ilhan Omar, Noah Berlatsky, Elisha Fieldstadt and Eun Kyung Kim.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:50 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
My number is $10 million with an NDA
Under but only because Juries are made up of people who typically aren't smart enough to get out of Jury duty and who typically vote for democrats.
Regardless the Post isn't the only one who will have to pay.
The lawyers will wind up with 50%+ of his settlements
He will still end up with around 1 or 2 mil by the time all of the lawsuits are done and the attorneys milk it.
Maybe just maybe the left will at least learn a lesson
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:51 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
There is no loss to the kid's income or potential income bc of the incident.
They fricked his reputation.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:54 pm to Scoop
quote:
A good attorney could use David Hogg as an example of the effect of media attention re a student that had their ambitions affected by the media spotlight. David Hogg has no qualifications to go to Harvard but was offered a scholarship based on his political stances and media perception.
Explain how Hogg wasn't Harvard material.
Do you have access to his private education GPA and ACT/SAT scores?
How do you know he didn't meet their criteria?
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:54 pm to Loserman
It’ll be 60-75 million
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:54 pm to mahdragonz
Hogg was a dumbass
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:57 pm to mahdragonz
Please stop dodging my question and explain your legal background. Specifically - your knowledge of discovery and the elements needed to prove Sandmann’s claims.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News