- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Trump sexual assault accusation from the Huffington Post
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:41 am to texridder
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:41 am to texridder
quote:
And, supposedly she has been the target of some harassment.
LOL bullshite she's become a hero of the left and Democratic politicians, all of them still worship at her altar as a foot soldier for "the Resistance"
quote:
The obvious person who fits into that category is Mark Judge. Ford alleged he was in the room with Kavanaugh when the incident occurred. But it seems that Judge not testifying would already be pretty obvious.
He already submitted a sworn statement stating he didn't have memory of the incident or the party alleged and never saw JUSTICE Kavanaugh act in the way Ford described. Moreover, no one blocked him from doing anything, he did not ask to involve himself in this nor did he want to involve himself in this.

Posted on 6/22/19 at 12:10 pm to Wild Thang
quote:It gets lower every time I read one of your posts. Good thing I have some room to spare.
Your IQ is so fricking low
Posted on 6/22/19 at 12:49 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
And, supposedly she hquote:LOL BULL shite she's become a hero of the left and Democratic politicians, all of them still worship at her altar as a foot soldier for "the Resistance"
as been the target of some harassment.
So you don't think she got/gets harassed/threatened by the Trump foot soldiers?
You need to watch your posts more carefully. You can't afford to let yourself be seen as any stupider than you already are.
quote:The Republican committee controlled who testified and Judge's name was not on the witness list, hence he did not testify.
Moreover, no one blocked him from doing anything, he did not ask to involve himself in this nor did he want to involve himself in this.
SEE, my comment in paragraph #2, above.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 12:54 pm to texridder
quote:
The Republican committee controlled who testified and Judge's name was not on the witness list, hence he did not testify.
Judge wrote a certified letter to the Senate Committee where affirmed that he had no recollection of any event as described by Ford and could not corroborate a single allegation by Ford.
He was then interviewed by the FBI in their investigation of the matter and stated the same.
You’re fishing for nothing
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:00 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:Was the letter all in his own handwriting?
Judge wrote a certified letter to the Senate Committee where affirmed that he had no recollection of any event as described by Ford and could not corroborate a single allegation by Ford.
If not, then he did not write it.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:02 pm to the808bass
quote:
You know how groups of people dissolve when you walk up to them at parties? No one likes you.
ahh, the bastion of the truly desperate, defeated man: the ad hominem attack. the quickest way to illustrate for all to see that you are arguing something you know nothing about.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:03 pm to texridder
quote:
Was the letter all in his own handwriting?
If not, then he did not write it.
Holy shite.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:04 pm to texridder
quote:
You need to watch your posts more carefully. You can't afford to let yourself be seen as any stupider than you already are.
Considering I've been right the entire time and you've been wrong, you're really just directing this to yourself
quote:
The Republican committee controlled who testified and Judge's name was not on the witness list, hence he did not testify.
He submitted a sworn statement to the committee then submitted to an FBI interview where he repeated his sword statement, people seriously cannot be this stupid, can they?
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:08 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Judge wrote a certified letter to the Senate Committee where affirmed that he had no recollection of any event as described by Ford and could not corroborate a single allegation by Ford.
What a completely useless letter.
The lawyer who wrote it made sure it was.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:10 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
Ahyuck hyuck hyuck.
That's what I hear in my head every time I read one of your posts.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:11 pm to texridder
quote:
What a completely useless letter.
It's only useless to you because it doesn't confirm your bias regarding an accuser who's lied about multiple things and changed the Kavanaugh accusation story multiple times, the biggest nothing burger in the history of the Earth that almost ruined a man's reputation and family, should be ashamed of yourself
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:13 pm to texridder
Ridder, upon what are you basing your being convinced that Kavanaugh committed this offense? As in what have you seen, read, heard personally in that regard??
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:16 pm to davyjones
quote:
Ridder, upon what are you basing your being convinced that Kavanaugh committed this offense? As in what have you seen, read, heard personally in that regard??
I really wanna pull a Matt Gaetz on this joker and ask if he has personal knowledge of anything material related to the Kavanaugh false accusation or it's all based off assumptions because of his absurd bias
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:16 pm to davyjones
Just look at this lying, whore
“Please someone give me attention!!!”

“Please someone give me attention!!!”

Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:18 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
You still believe Ford?
texridder check list:
- Still believes the Kavanaugh fairy tale
- Still believes the Russia fairy tale
- Believed the JusssieTerry fairy tale
- Believed the Covington Kids fairy tale
How embarrassing
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:20 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Was the letter all in his own handwriting? If not, then he did not write it.
quote:
Holy shite.
Let me help you with this, since you seem to be having some trouble.
The fact that it was not in his own handwriting was not meant in in the sense of a technicality, to mean that he did literally, physically, write the letter himself.
It was meant in the sense that Judge did not draft or decide the content of the letter itself.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:21 pm to ZIGG
In my mind that woman there ruined any credibility of her claims by virtue of obvious and blatant financial gain.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:23 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
based off assumptions because of his absurd bias
That's my guess but Im open to being convinced otherwise.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:33 pm to texridder
quote:
Was the letter all in his own handwriting?
If not, then he did not write it.
Everyone is lying except for the one lady with multiple contradicting stories, large gaps in her narrative, and the motive to lie.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:34 pm to texridder
quote:
The fact that it was not in his own handwriting was not meant in in the sense of a technicality, to mean that he did literally, physically, write the letter himself.
It was meant in the sense that Judge did not draft or decide the content of the letter itself.
But this is an extremely common practice. And I just read a Wapo article describing how Judge even signed the letter alongside the notation "under penalty of perjury". Throw in the fact that the contents were pretty straightforward and not a bunch of legalese and red herring for the sake of confusion. It's fine if you dont believe his assertions in the letter, but to say those are assertions manufactured by an attorney and not accurately representative of Judge's recollection is a conspiratorial stretch.
Popular
Back to top


1




