Started By
Message

re: New emails from Epstein about Trump released. These actually don’t look good.

Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
84980 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

BBONDS25 clearly does not know.

He thinks the Epstein files are just the testimony of a couple of LEOs at the Grand Jury for Maxwell's case. Reasonable people know that is complete nonsense, but he fell for it.

I have never said I want them to release pictures and videos of powerful men have sex with kids. That is a flat out lie.



Releasing all the files would include these.



Most people on here haven't even read the files that have been released. Since they are calling a woman who testified she was 17-20 when abused a child.

That's legal in most countries.





I'll go further. I hate the Clintons. But the chick in this picture is 22 years old. people try to use this to prove bill is a pedophile. But his MO has always just been young women. Not little girls.



This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 3:17 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39281 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Because you don't shoot yourself to take him out


Sure you do when you are as desperate as democrats are.

Sure you do if you were infected by terminal TDS.

Both apply in this case.
Posted by Bama Mountain
Member since Oct 2025
327 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Releasing all the files would include these.


No, they would not. Nor would anyone want them to. Even the files released today had victims names redated.

I am more interested in who funded him and why.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
24382 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:21 pm to
It looks like someone's allegations about things Trump did and didn't do. Allegations are like opinions. Everyone has one. Surely there are pictures of Trump doing what is claimed or others who have spoken out.....crickets.

With all of the fake shite some people have been doing for years to take him down, I will withhold judgment. These people hardly have any credibility. Maybe Adam Shitforbrains wants to weigh in.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
55733 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Your game of posting a lie, then gyrating around spewing insults, makes you look completely foolish.


You didn’t know the definition of “witness.” Perhaps you’re not the right person to be calling anyone foolish.

quote:

The testimony of two LEOs are not the Epstein files. Only the most gullible Trump groupies believe such nonsense, which is why even the judge mocked Trump's pathetic stunt


You citing an Obama appointed judge as an argument? You do know why “appeal to authority” is a logical fallacy, right? Of course you don’t. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Posted by Bama Mountain
Member since Oct 2025
327 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:36 pm to
Thanks for proving my point.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
18328 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:39 pm to
Trump is the most investigated president in US history. They’ve got nothing
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
45817 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:40 pm to
So CNN is reporting that the victim in the email is Giuffre and the democrats who leaked it redacted the name. Probably because Guiffre has said over and over and over again that Trump never did anything wrong and was nothing but kind to her in their brief interactions.

This is another "51 intelligence officials" hoax.

ETA: Giuffre would have been nearly 30 when this alleged email was sent to Maxwell.

/thread
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 3:47 pm
Posted by thejuiceisloose
Member since Nov 2018
5984 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

So CNN is reporting that the victim in the email is Giuffre and the democrats who leaked it redacted the name. Probably because Guiffre has said over and over and over again that Trump never did anything wrong and was nothing but kind to her in their brief interactions.

This is another "51 intelligence officials" hoax.

/thread


The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
10457 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:48 pm to
Yep JUST FOUND THEM after decades of looking. Trust us.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92345 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:49 pm to
The tds clown Juiceisloose (a kamala voter) has solved the mystery

Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
495 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:51 pm to
lol

Did you hear he's a Russian asset too? And he pee'd on a hotel bed? And he commited mortgage fraud? And he molested his own daughter? And he said nazis are good? And he raped his ex wife?

DERP
Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
495 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

This is another "51 intelligence officials" hoax.


Exactly.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
84980 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I am more interested in who funded him and why.



We already know this.


Les Wexner.


What I'm trying to tell you is there most likely isn't anything new to be released. And nothing that will or could be released will satisfy people unless it says Israel funded it and Trump had sex with prepubescent children.


This thing doesn't live up to the hype. The most likely scenario is some rich men had sex with prostitutes who were on the younger side. Like teens to early 20s.


Annie Farmer is one of the victims that has recently been doing the rounds on TV and testified against Maxwell. She was introduced to Epstein by her sister. Her parents knew she was going to Epstein's in New Mexico. This doesn't reach the level of crazy people want it to be.



People also struggle with definitions. They think having sex with anyone under 18 is pedophilia. It is not.

They don't understand sex trafficking. Any person under 18 engaged in prostitution in the US is sex trafficking. Any prostitution that happens across state lines is sex trafficking.

I can pay for an escort from another state to have sex with me and that is by definition sex trafficking. And I didn't need a huge financial backer or a country or the CIA to do it.


This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 4:09 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
84980 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears


Yes, I'm rejecting what the Democrat party is saying and have read the files that are out there and listened to interviews of victims like Annie Farmer.


Also funny how the Dems never mention the Clinton and Obama ties to Epstein.


This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 3:58 pm
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
15588 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
45817 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 4:05 pm to
Hurricane needs to come back and eat his fricking crow.

Giuffre was pushing 30 by 2011, and was a second generation Mar-A-Lago employee who knew Trump and respected him. This is a digusting smear by democrats, but sadly its not the first.
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 4:07 pm
Posted by Lighteningbolt
Member since Oct 2025
187 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Trump never did anything wrong
So then why is he protecting all the Deep Staters who did?
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
2746 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 4:08 pm to
You TDS'ers got him now, right? If there were any nefarious stuff with the epstein connection, democrats would have released it years ago. H3LL those with TDS would sacrifice their own kids to get Trump.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
84980 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

So then why is he protecting all the Deep Staters who did?


Which ones?




A lot of people have been duped and won't admit it.
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 4:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram