- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nearly ALL current global warming is fabricated: peer reviewed study finds
Posted on 7/10/17 at 1:57 pm to texag7
Posted on 7/10/17 at 1:57 pm to texag7
Can we cut out the middle man of stupid "i don't know do you know? I dont know do you know?" and go straight to no one knows much before we developed more accurate ways to measure?
1
Posted on 7/10/17 at 1:57 pm to Salmon
Yes. It is.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 1:58 pm to Iosh
quote:You understand the nature of the Ice Age, yes?
It makes no sense to ask about optimums without defining what you're optimizing for.
It seems we are roughly at interglacial maximum, yes?
We understand little as to underlying mechanisms driving Ice Age temp fluctuations, but do understand (I presume) most long term climate risks to reflect cooling, right?
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:01 pm to olddawg26
Can you help Salmon with his claim?
quote:
historically, it's a pretty sharp increase over 100 years
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:02 pm to Salmon
quote:
Many different variables. Some are set. Some are assumed.
Yeah...no. Science doesn't "assume" unknown factors and then peddle the assumptions as dire enough to demand that humankind change it's way of life.
Again..what branch of the field of "emissions" do you work in? Mechanical devices, atmospheric affects, enclosed areas, global??
quote:
Well that isn't true at all
Yes it was...as far as the every same people who were then scaring people about global ice age and are now scaring people about boiling oceans.
quote:
The statistical models made these prediction? Interesting.
Nooo, the statistical analysts that you seem to put such faith in made the dire predictions.
Are you claiming that you have no idea that all these "scientists" are not warning humanity to change their ways or some dire thing will happen (How religiously apocalyptic in nature.."Repent!! Change your ways while there is still time!!").
You're playing willfully ignorant.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:03 pm to texag7
quote:That's a bit like this:
That's what I thought.
Person A: "Wow Russell Westbrook averaged a triple-double last season with 31.6 points, 10.6 assists, and 10.4 rebounds; that's a rare and impressive feat for a season."
Person B: "What were Oscar Robertson's stats in his triple double season in 61-62?"
Person A:"I don't know. Do you?"
Person B:"That's what I thought."
That's a pretty weak gotcha tex.
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:05 pm to olddawg26
quote:
I think this goes back to thinking humans are made in gods image and so important that we are incapable of wiping ourselves out, without the rapture.
Interesting. How much would you guess the temperatures would have to rise or fall in order to "wipe ourselves out"? How many degrees...just ballpark.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:08 pm to Salmon
quote:
historically, it's a pretty sharp increase over 100 years
bullshite. That said, your observation is still a non sequitur. 0.8 degrees has caused zero changes that would threaten human life, don't you agree? If not, what do you see as the nature of this threat?
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:09 pm to buckeye_vol
Wow just wow.
Using a 100 year old sport to try to support his definition of "historically".
That's a reach even for you
Using a 100 year old sport to try to support his definition of "historically".
That's a reach even for you
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:09 pm to Salmon
quote:
I do believe, however, that we will solve our pollution problems within the near future
How are these "pollution problems" manifesting themselves?
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:10 pm to Dale51
quote:
Yeah...no. Science doesn't "assume" unknown factors
Who said the factors were unknown?
quote:
then peddle the assumptions as dire enough to demand that humankind change it's way of life.
Science doesn't do this. Politicians do this.
quote:
Yes it was...as far as the every same people who were then scaring people about global ice age
No. They were not. Can you provide some examples of this?
quote:
the statistical analysts that you seem to put such faith in made the dire predictions.
Did they? Or did some NYT writer or politician make them?
quote:
Are you claiming that you have no idea that all these "scientists" are not warning humanity to change their ways or some dire thing will happen
I'm sure most are. And we probably should change our ways.
Do you not think we should strive to be cleaner?
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:11 pm to olddawg26
quote:
No one is saying the present temperature is right or wrong.
So there is no problem with the temp being what it is now....so why all the demand it be changed?
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:12 pm to Dale51
quote:
How much would you guess the temperatures would have to rise or fall in order to "wipe ourselves out"?
No idea. I wasn't really specifically talking about temperature alone that would hurt us. You can google how much heat a human can take though and apply it to that strawman if you want
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:13 pm to Dale51
quote:
How are these "pollution problems" manifesting themselves?
Well that is quite the broad question, but I'll assume you mean globally
And the data suggests that CO2 emissions are increasing. And the data would suggest that the global temperature is increasing with that.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:14 pm to Dale51
quote:
So there is no problem with the temp being what it is now....so why all the demand it be changed?
I think its really important to understand if you truly think the issue is the warming trend or an issue with current temps.
Because what you're saying here is that you think there is no warming and the current climate is the actual problem that everyone is upset about..
Can you correct yourself here or double down on that
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:15 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:Except it isn't.
That's a bit like this:
Person A: "Wow Russell Westbrook averaged a triple-double last season with 31.6 points, 10.6 assists, and 10.4 rebounds; that's a rare and impressive feat for a season."
Person B: "What were Oscar Robertson's stats in his triple double season in 61-62?"
Person A:"I don't know. Do you?"
Person B:"That's what I thought."
That's a pretty weak gotcha tex.
Here is the analogy:
Person A: "Wow Russell Westbrook averaged a triple-double last season with 31.6 points, 10.6 assists, and 10.4 rebounds; no player could accomplish that without modern man-made contributions including new diet supplements, computer guided workouts, and air-jordans."
Person B: "What were Oscar Robertson's stats in his triple double season in 61-62?"
Person A:"I don't know. Do you?"
Person B:"That's what I thought."
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Person B: "What were Oscar Robertson's stats in his triple double season in 61-62?"
Person A:"I don't know. Do you?"
Person B:"That's what I thought."
well this analogy fails because Person B obviously knows Oscar's stats because they at least know he averaged a triple double
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:17 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
61-62
Dont we actually have those well documented though?
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:18 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
That's a bit like this:
It's nothing at all like that.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:20 pm to NC_Tigah
According to ice core records we would expect a natural drop of 8°C over the next 100,000 years. We've added 1°C in 100. I said this the last time you floated this argument but since you're clearly going there again: Saying AGW is good because it will stave off the glaciers is like burning your house down tomorrow because the winter is forecast to be harsh.
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News