- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NBC reporting senate intel finds no evidence of conspiracy between djt campaign and russia
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:51 am
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:51 am
quote:
WASHINGTON — After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.
But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.
"If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," said Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, in an interview with CBS News last week.
Burr was careful to note that more facts may yet be uncovered, but he also made clear that the investigation was nearing an end.
"We know we're getting to the bottom of the barrel because there're not new questions that we're searching for answers to," Burr said.
Democratic Senate investigators who spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity did not dispute Burr's characterizations, but said they lacked context.
LINK
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:52 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Who's going to be the first dem to completely melt down? I'm going with FT
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:53 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
This doesn't mean much, really. This investigation result is more politics than anything else
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:53 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Everyone with a functioning brain cell knows there was never any "collusion"
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:53 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
They're just now reporting this? LOL @ that clown show.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:54 am to nugget
Somewhere Mark Warner is in total denial
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:54 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Burr was careful to note that more facts may yet be uncovered
So in 2 yrs you couldn't find any BUT it may just happen to show up any day now.....amirite Burr?? Dumbfrick
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:55 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
NBC reporting senate intel finds no evidence of conspiracy between djt campaign and russia
Well, that's just because they didn't have Adam Schiff running things. Let's see what the house finds out. I'll be they find all kinds of colluding, manipulating, canoodling and all sorts of other -ings.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:55 am to OchoDedos
Hell Richard Burr probably is too.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:55 am to OchoDedos
quote:
Somewhere Mark Warner is in total denial
Mark Warner is a key player in SpyGate. He should be worried
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:56 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Decatur still believes!
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:57 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
1. I agree that there was almost certainly no affirmative collusion.
2. Regardless of the facts, what would one expect from a GOP-controlled committee?
2. Regardless of the facts, what would one expect from a GOP-controlled committee?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:58 am to AggieHank86
quote:
2. Regardless of the facts, what would one expect from a GOP-controlled committee?
Terrible spin
This post was edited on 2/12/19 at 10:03 am
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:59 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Regardless of the facts, what would one expect from a GOP-controlled committee?
I'd bet the farm Richard Burr voted for Clinton in 2016.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:00 am to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
I will never understand why you feel the need to literally have to spin EVERY post you respond to on this board
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:00 am to Bunyan
quote:Why would you bother to change the words in the language you quoted from my post? Very strange.
Terrible spin
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Why would you bother to change the words in the language you quoted from my post? Very strange.
Because my auto correct on my phone changed it when I was making the bold part. I'll change it back now. Thanks for letting me know
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:03 am to BeeFense5
quote:
I will never understand why you feel the need to literally have to spin EVERY post you respond to on this board
As much as I don't want to admit it, he's correct. This was an investigation carried out by politicians who don't want the other side to win. I also agree that they haven't shown any evidence of collusion and their result is correct, but this was a partisan influenced investigation.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:04 am to upgrayedd
quote:
but this was a partisan influenced investigation.
So is Mueller's
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News