- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy officer applies to become the first ever woman to join the elite SEALs
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:29 pm to Argonaut
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:29 pm to Argonaut
quote:you shouldn't have to go through a day to my page since you know where the positive parts are
The report is 978 pages. The summary is four pages. You really expect me to go through it with you page by page?
0
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:30 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
But heck we don't even have women men's soccer.
bc its not even the same game
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:30 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The whole study discussion is a farce anyways.
I agree. I even said so. More than once.
Yet, it continues to be brought up.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:30 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
IWNHI
It might hit you.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:32 pm to Argonaut
quote:
I agree. I even said so. More than once. Yet, it continues to be brought up.
He was mocking you
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:32 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Yet, it continues to be brought up.
Due to your insistence that the study was narrow and suppressed results and your subsequent failure to provide evidence of those claims.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:33 pm to tommy2tone1999
The bottom line is that if women could improve or even sustain men's teams in physical endeavors there would be at least a few women in every major professional men's sport
It takes a government to try to believe demonstrably false things
It takes a government to try to believe demonstrably false things
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:33 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
No. I do not. I simply ask you to provide me the page numbers of the omitted portions.
You're asking me to tell you what, in a 978 page report, is not in a four page summary.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:35 pm to Argonaut
quote:
You're asking me to tell you what, in a 978 page report, is not in a four page summary
Pick one of these points you feel is salient pick one of the points you feel as sale yet within the 978 pick one of the points you feel as sale yet within the 978 pages we're pick one of the points you feel as salient to your points or just admit that you are talking out of your arse
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:36 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Pick one of these points you feel is salient pick one of the points you feel as sale yet within the 978 pick one of the points you feel as sale yet within the 978 pages we're pick one of the points you feel as salient to your points or just admit that you are talking out of your arse
???
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:37 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Well obviously. I'm saying a straight leg grunt unit will be more affected cohesion wise than a SOF unit.
Every woman in any of these organizations is taking the slot of a more physically gifted male who has MUCH more upside to boot.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:38 pm to Argonaut
quote:
You're asking me to tell you what, in a 978 page report, is not in a four page summary.
I'm asking which portions of the actual study were omitted or suppressed. You are attempting to shift the discussion in a way that makes it sound like you were talking about the summary. It's clear from your comments that I quoted on the last page that you were referring to the actual study. What portions of the actual study were omitted, as you clearly claimed?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:41 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
I'm asking which portions of the actual study were omitted or suppressed.
I've already told you. Read the report, then we'll discuss it. Deal?
Hell, I'll even settle for a light skim of the report.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:44 pm to Argonaut
Then you'll be happy to know that I did a light skim when the report was released. Now kindly direct me to the omitted portion.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:45 pm to Argonaut
quote:=chicken shite
Argonaut
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:46 pm to Argonaut
I wrote the fricking report....
Which part do you disagree with?
Which part do you disagree with?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:48 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Then you'll be happy to know that I did a light skim when the report was released. Now kindly direct me to the omitted portion.
What were the findings related to morale, cohesion, discipline, etc? We'll start there.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:50 pm to Argonaut
quote:exactly what i expected
What were the findings related to morale, cohesion, discipline, etc? We'll start there.
Anyone who says they read it, you'll just quiz. You'll never answer
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:54 pm to Argonaut
quote:
What were the findings related to morale, cohesion, discipline, etc? We'll start there.
I have made no claims about the content of the report. You are free to read back through the thread. Since I've made no claims I have no obligation to support, defend, or summarize anything contained in the report. You have made a claim about the findings of the report so the burden of proof is on you to provide. You are obviously not able to do that so this is all a show so you can avoid admitting that you are a liar. You have a terribly low opinion of humanity if you think you're fooling a single person with your bullshite.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:57 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
I have made no claims about the content of the report. You are free to read back through the thread. Since I've made no claims I have no obligation to support,
She's ballcaster
She'll never answer
Page 36 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News