- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy officer applies to become the first ever woman to join the elite SEALs
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:39 pm to TigerBait1971
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:39 pm to TigerBait1971
quote:
You really suck at succinctly communicating your position with clarity.
Nobody in this thread has been able to figure out what her argument even is and she thinks that everyone else has a comprehension problem. Never occurs to her that she just sucks at making a point. She's one of those people that blames everybody else for her shortcomings.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:40 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
They are the ones who make sure people finish or not
No shite.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:40 pm to Argonaut
quote:
I already answered this.
Oh okay, so the answer to your question of "should guys be allowed to try out for WNBA teams is no?""
That's odd because earlier in the thread you said "this is 2017 and there are not jobs for men and women"
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:42 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
no
Correct, with a little bit of context.
quote:
That's odd because earlier in the thread you said "this is 2017 and there are not jobs for men and women"
Yep. Getting rid of the WNBA contributes to this.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:42 pm to TigerBait1971
quote:
How are the attendees selected? I asked this a while back...
If you come straight in off the street, you just sign up for the job and make sure you pass the pre reqs. Then go right after boot camp.
If you are retraining into it, there is a package you have to do, along with the pre reqs and then it goes to a board. Women applicants who have no chance of making it can take slots from men with a better chance of making it.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:44 pm to StraightCashHomey21
So a board decides who gets to go to the school?
How do they narrow down who will attend? I'm sure they always have more applicants than slots...
How do they narrow down who will attend? I'm sure they always have more applicants than slots...
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:47 pm to TigerBait1971
quote:
So a board decides who gets to go to the school
pretty much
they only want the best and most sharp people going into these schools and careers. Lots of time when you retrain into them you are an E-4/E-5. So an NCO depending on what branch and you will be required to be a leader.
quote:Depends on manning needs. The Army is always looking for people and openly recruit those positions.
How do they narrow down who will attend? I'm sure they always have more applicants than slots...
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:48 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Someone posted the report in its entirety. It shouldn't be difficult to find it.
Again, I realize you believe yourself to be very clever, for reasons I can't fathom, but you claimed results were omitted that reflected poorly on men. You said that you would post the omitted portion today. It's disingenuous to claim you don't have to do that because someone has posted the study. Is that study complete? If so, what portions, specifically were previously omitted. If not, where is the omitted info? Where did you read it and where can I read it?
Oh, and you are absolutely Ballcaster.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:50 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
you claimed results were omitted that reflected poorly on men
I don't think that is what I claimed. I believe I said that the four-page summary being passed around didn't include positive results for the females.
quote:
Where did you read it and where can I read it?
I don't remember where I first saw it, but I believe it was linked from NPR in this thread. You can find it here.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:52 pm to Argonaut
quote:
I don't think that is what I claimed. I believe I said that the four-page summary being passed around didn't include positive results for the females.
What are the positive results then?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:54 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:01 pm to Argonaut
quote:
That study is incomplete, at best
quote:
For starters, they didn't even publish the study in its entirety. The study was also extremely narrow.
quote:
What was omitted?
Most of the positive results.
So kindly refer us to the portion of the study you are referring to here^^^^^.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:03 pm to northshorebamaman
No way you read it already.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:05 pm to Argonaut
quote:Please tell me you are not an officer.
Argonaut
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:06 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:agreed.
Oh, and you are absolutely Ballcaster.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:06 pm to Argonaut
quote:
No way you read it already.
Point out the omitted portion, please.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:08 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Point out the omitted portion, please.
There are 978 pages in the report. The summary that was originally floated was four pages. I'm not doing that.
You need to read the report before we discuss it.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:11 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Please tell me you are not an officer.
Probably even worse
the wife of an officer
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:12 pm to Argonaut
quote:
You need to read the report before we discuss it.
There is no logical reason I have to have read it first for you to point out the "positive results" that you claimed were omitted. You made the claim. It's on you to prove it. At this point you'd be better off admitting that you're a liar because you are obviously incapable of backing up claims you make.
Popular
Back to top



0





