- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy officer applies to become the first ever woman to join the elite SEALs
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:09 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:09 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Bc ive experienced it
You have not
That's true. I have not experienced "selection" for TACP.
quote:
He wasn't pretending to be military you c*nt
I didn't say he was.
quote:
and isn't combat arms
Just b/c women have seen combat doesn't mean they should be in combat arms.
That's irrelevant. You provided one example to make your point. I provided an example to make my point.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:10 am to skrayper
quote:
Way I see it is like this:
Don't change any of the requirements. If they pass, they're in. Doesn't matter their gender, and debates regarding IF women can do it or not is irrelevant. The SEAL team program is so small individuals can be weighed on merits instead of large scale debates on genetics and physiology.
If it ends up forcing people to make changes to the actual requirements, then I'm against. It's not "unfair" if the requirements mean a 100% dropout rate for women. Hell, the dropout rate NOW is 83%. That's a LOT of dudes who thought they were cut out for it who clearly weren't (and I'm not knocking them - I'd be washed out before breakfast on day one).
It is no knock to say that you didn't make it through BUDS, you are right there. I've seen a study that said you have a better chance of having two children graduate from Harvard than you do of having one who becomes a Navy SEAL. Those guys are no joke.
That being said. The guys who drop out of these type schools, they don't drop out because they are incapable of meeting the physical requirements. THat's not how it works. You don't even get a shot at Ranger School if you can't do X,Y,and Z. So if women can't do X,Y, or Z they should be cut out to begin with. It was actually found that they were NOT capable of doing so, so X,Y,and Z were removed from the list of things a person must be able to do to get to Ranger school.
Unless they likewise change the requirements for SEALs there is no point in allowing women to apply because under the current requirements no woman can qualify.
Earlier you cited 85% drop out rate at BUD/S, and that is true, but it's also true that only around 15% of men who apply even get a chance because the other 85% don't meet the minimum entry requirements.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:11 am to ShortyRob
Yea accepting a female who has a 100% chance of failing does nothing but take a class slot from a more eligible male candidate who has a higher % of making it through.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 11:15 am
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:12 am to ShortyRob
quote:
They already did.
The women who got selected for ranger school passed the minimum selection standard but were selected above men who performed at a higher level. Men who absolutely would have passed at a higher rate.
No, "they" didn't.
It's been pointed out already, and not even by me, that there is a large gap between Ranger School and BUD/S.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:13 am to Argonaut
quote:
That's true. I have not experienced "selection" for TACP.
You never experienced selection for anything.
quote:
I didn't say he was.
you said TACPs pretend to be military
quote:
if you move to TACP you can at least pretend that you're really in the military
quote:
That's irrelevant. You provided one example to make your point. I provided an example to make my point.
You made no point. You brought up a female who wasn't in combat arms.
You have still yet to give a reason why women should be in combat arms.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:13 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Yea accepting a female who has a 100% chance of failing does nothing but take a class slot from a more eligible male candidate who has a high % of making it through.
Now, NO ONE has a high chance of making it through special forces training of any kind.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:15 am to Argonaut
quote:
No, "they" didn't. It's been pointed out already, and not even by me, that there is a large gap between Ranger School and BUD/S.
No he brought up RASP
Ranger school is a leadership course that non infantry and other branches can attend.
Of course you didn't know that.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 11:22 am
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:15 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Now, NO ONE has a high chance of making it through special forces training of any kind.
meant to say higher chance, not high.
Men have a higher chance of making through compared to a female.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 11:16 am
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:16 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
you said TACPs pretend to be military
I didn't say that. Stop lying.
quote:
You made no point. You brought up a female who wasn't in combat arms.
I did make a point. You just didn't like it because you let your emotions get the better of you.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:18 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Of course you didn't know that.
No need to look down on people who don't know the technical jargon and such bro. I think I even earlier mistakenly used the term "ranger school" when I was referring to RASP2, and I have my beret and patch. Never served in the Regiment, went a different route, but definitely survived the courses.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:19 am to Argonaut
quote:
I didn't say that. Stop lying.
Yea you did
quote:
I did make a point. You just didn't like it because you let your emotions get the better of you.
and what point is that???
You brought up a female who saw combat, shes not the first or last. But no where did that justify why females should be in combat arms or special operations.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:19 am to StraightCashHomey21
Oh.
That includes the post that I replied to.
quote:
Ranger school
quote:
Ranger school
quote:
Ranger School
quote:
ranger school
quote:
Ranger School
quote:
Ranger school
That includes the post that I replied to.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:21 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
No need to look down on people who don't know the technical jargon and such bro. I think I even earlier mistakenly used the term "ranger school" when I was referring to RASP2, and I have my beret and patch. Never served in the Regiment, went a different route, but definitely survived the courses.
She needs to be called out, bc she has been talking shite to all the military members in here. Claiming to be military but won't disclose what she does. All while being clueless on basic military stuff.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:22 am to Argonaut
quote:
Ranger school
is a leadership course...........
Hell an AF chief just went through it last year.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:24 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Yea you did
No I didn't. I said so you can hang out with others and not get in the way.
quote:
You brought up a female who saw combat, shes not the first or last. But no where did that justify why females should be in combat arms or special operations.
You brought up a TACP dude that was injured by an IED to make an obscure point.
I brought up a female that excelled in combat. How many Silver Stars do you have? Have a CAB?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:27 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Claiming to be military but won't disclose what she does.
I didn't claim anything. You're trying to fill in the blanks because, for some reason, it bothers you that I won't talk about myself.
quote:
All while being clueless on basic military stuff.
You mean like this:
quote:
services
quote:
DoD
You and the other dude are trying to claim I "didn't know" something because I didn't address it the way you wanted me to address it.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:27 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
is a leadership course...........
Hell an AF chief just went through it last year.
I addressed what was brought up by others.
Call them out.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:28 am to Argonaut
quote:
No I didn't. I said so you can hang out with others and not get in the way.
you are a bitch that was probably picked last playing sports as a kid
quote:
I brought up a female that excelled in combat. How many Silver Stars do you have? Have a CAB?
none of which justifies women being in combat arms or special operations.
Ive met a few females in the AF with a CAB. They just happened to see combat but their job wasn't going outside the wire humping it through the mountains running missions.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 11:30 am
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Literally the military has been paying personal trainers for these women giving them a year of prep time to just pass the initial PT standards and they still can't meet the standard.
They have been doing the same for men since 2008, the Naval Special Warfare Preparatory School was established to help increase the number of recruits that qualify for BUDS.
"As part of a Navy-wide plan to recruit and grow the Navy's elite Sea, Air and Land warriors, or Navy SEALs, a new school was officially recognized Feb. 7. The Naval Special Warfare Preparatory School will now be a unique step for Sailors looking to become SEALS."
LINK
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:37 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
you are a bitch that was probably picked last playing sports as a kid
Maybe. Maybe I excelled in sports as a kid.
No matter which of those is true and which is not, I'm still not an Air Force comm bitch that was injured after I made it through "selection."
quote:
none of which justifies women being in combat arms or special operations.
Well, that certainly doesn't support not letting them in.
quote:
Ive met a few females in the AF with a CAB.
How many had Silver Stars?
quote:
They just happened to see combat but their job wasn't going outside the wire humping it through the mountains running missions.
Because they weren't able, or because they couldn't do it?
Popular
Back to top


1


