- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:19 pm to northshorebamaman
For starters, they didn't even publish the study in its entirety. The study was also extremely narrow.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:19 pm to Argonaut
Sigh
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 11:20 pm
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:20 pm to northshorebamaman
Yes. The count stands at zero, on both sides.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:20 pm to Argonaut
quote:
For starters, they didn't even publish the study in its entirety.
What was omitted?
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:22 pm to northshorebamaman
Most of the positive results.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:23 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Most of the positive results.
That's incredibly vague. What did these positive results say? Where did you see them? Where can I see them?
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:27 pm to Argonaut
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:29 pm to northshorebamaman
They said quite a bit that wasn't in the summary most will throw around in these discussions.
Should be easy to find with Google.
I'm going to bed. Maybe I'll look for it tomorrow if you can't find it.
Should be easy to find with Google.
I'm going to bed. Maybe I'll look for it tomorrow if you can't find it.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:30 pm to Argonaut
When did y'all get so anti-science?
Lordy.
I realize you want this to be true. Need this to be true. But it's not. This is a reality that you can't wish away.
Lordy.
I realize you want this to be true. Need this to be true. But it's not. This is a reality that you can't wish away.
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:30 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Cool, I'll give it a look tomorrow. Maybe I'll have my mind changed.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:31 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Maybe I'll look for it tomorrow if you can't find it.
I look forward to it.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:36 pm to cajunangelle
So this is what has been keeping NT74 busy.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 11:36 pm to Argonaut
I've read that study in its entirety. There's nothing in there that's positive about women in combat.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:36 am to Argonaut
That's your basis right there
Original thought
Original thought
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:37 am to Argonaut
The study is pretty clear and cut
It's not neuroscience.
You've earned some liberal arts degree didn't you
It's not neuroscience.
You've earned some liberal arts degree didn't you
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:39 am to lsucoonass
quote:
The study is pretty clear and cut
Did you post this study?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:40 am to Argonaut
Ok
Link the study
You posts these positives and I'll posts the negatives when I can and we will see what everyone opinion is
Link the study
You posts these positives and I'll posts the negatives when I can and we will see what everyone opinion is
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:41 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I've read that study in its entirety. There's nothing in there that's positive about women in combat.
I'd probably agree with that, but only because there's nothing in it that's inherently positive about men in combat either.
Popular
Back to top



1



