- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Naples, FL media is reporting democrats used altered election forms after deadline passed
Posted on 11/16/18 at 12:44 am to texridder
Posted on 11/16/18 at 12:44 am to texridder
quote:Does someone actually have that information, outside the courts?
Not one substantiated claim of actual voter fraud.
E.g., My understanding is there were documented double votes. Now that does not necessarily indicate deliberate fraud, but it certainly could. There are incidences of mismatched signatures. Fraud? I guess that will be for the courts to decide.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 12:44 am to LSURussian
quote:Can you not read, or are you stupid, or are you lying?
The judge allowed Fulton County to NOT COUNT 972 provisional ballos. That affected the vote.
quote:
The news comes just a day after U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg on Monday ordered the state to review provisional ballots to make sure none are improperly rejected and to delay certification of the midterm until Friday. Fulton received 3,549 provisional ballots, 1,555 of which were rejected,
quote:
Barron said he did not think any of the judge’s ruling would affect Fulton’s count
Provisional ballot ARE NOT COUNTED UNTIL THEY ARE VERIFIED. None of the provisional votes had been counted.
The judge's ruling did not affect the vote other than it kept those provisional votes from being counted.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 12:47 am to LSURussian
quote:
Just like Gillum’s brother knew he was committing voter fraud in 2016 when he voted in Tallahassee, FL when he was a legal resident of Chicago.
Lol
Posted on 11/16/18 at 12:53 am to LSURussian
quote:
Out of 581 votes by people who weren’t registered to vote? You goddam right some of them knew they were trying to commit voter fraud!
How do you think they thought they were going to vote if they weren't registered?
And if they weren't registered, once they found out, why in the hell would they stick around to fill out the form to cast a provisional vote and give the SOE all their information?
Posted on 11/16/18 at 1:08 am to NC_Tigah
quote:I have not seen that.
My understanding is there were documented double votes.
The signatures could be attempted vote fraud, but the signatures are being compared by laypersons comparing the signature to the signature on file which could be years old when the person registered to vote.
Not to even mention that the signature is on a sealed envelope with the ballot folded up inside -- don't try that at home.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 1:09 am to texridder
quote:
Not one substantiated claim of actual voter fraud. Just a bunch of smoke
Yeah some may fall for your bullshite. I won't.
One party changed election forms. Just one.
Dance
Posted on 11/16/18 at 1:25 am to roadGator
quote:Was that voter fraud. Yes or no. The answer is no. It didn't affect one vote.
One party changed election forms. Just one.
The judge in 2016 held the way mail-in vote signatures were handled was unconstitutional and gave voters extra time to provide information to verify their signatures, by sending in something called a Mail-in Ballot Cure Affidavit.
Florida law requires that the county SOE send a notice to every voter whose mail-in ballot was rejected. The Florida Dem Committee was mailing Cure Affidavits to voters whose ballots had been rejected. The Cure affidavit form said that it was due the day before the election. The Dems changed that to read 2 days after the election because that was the extension they intended to ask the court to grant.
It didn't mean anything unless the judge granted their extension request. it didn't change a single vote.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 1:34 am to texridder
quote:
The ignorant statement is made all the time by people like you.
How ignorant of you to assume you know people like me.
quote:
Some are infirm. Some are disabled.
And?
quote:
And some have to work during voting hours.
You mean like most of American society? There's an easy solution to this.
quote:
Do you think more Americans voting is a bad thing?
I don't think it is a good or a bad thing. But THIS...
quote:....is clearly "ripe for fraud" as I originally stated.
Mail-in voting increases voter participation.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 1:44 am to texridder
quote:
So rather than being able to use a mail-in ballot, you think they should have to get up early and vote before they go to work.
YES! Like most hard-working individuals do.
quote:
Why is that?
Because laziness is not a hardship to voting.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 2:05 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
How ignorant of you to assume you know people like me.
quote:
How about people get off their arse and go vote like everyone else does? Quit relying on MAIL which is ripe for fraud! If voting is that important to a person, make the effort.
If you made a statement that ignorant (which you did) then I assume you are an ignorant dumba$$.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 2:10 am to texridder
Who violated the law? Dance all you want. Your party broke the law. Denounce it or celebrate it. Your choice. I think you celebrate it and love this test run.
This is your tactic all the damn time. Dems changed a state election form. By what authority did the have to do that? Defend it, arse hat. I dare you.
quote:
The judge in 2016 held the way mail-in vote signatures were handled was unconstitutional and gave voters extra time to provide information to verify their signatures, by sending in something called a Mail-in Ballot Cure Affidav
This is your tactic all the damn time. Dems changed a state election form. By what authority did the have to do that? Defend it, arse hat. I dare you.
This post was edited on 11/16/18 at 2:37 am
Posted on 11/16/18 at 3:24 am to roadGator
quote:
This is your tactic all the damn time. Dems changed a state election form. By what authority did the have to do that? Defend it, arse hat. I dare you.
I already did in my 1:25 post.
This post was edited on 11/16/18 at 3:25 am
Posted on 11/16/18 at 10:57 am to texridder
quote:
The Dems changed that to read 2 days after the election because that was the extension they intended to ask the court to grant.
So you admit that the dems changed a state election form without authority. Good.
See. That wasn't so difficult.
You don't have a problem with it. That's fine but your thong would be more twisted than Charles Manson's head if the enemy side had done it and you'd find a sick angle that orange man bad did it.
You know it. I know it. Everyone here that laughs at you daily knows it. Hell, even you prog buddies here know it.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 12:25 pm to roadGator
quote:
You don't have a problem with it. That's fine but your thong would be more twisted than Charles Manson's head if the enemy side had done it and you'd find a sick angle that orange man bad did it.
It didn't change one vote. If the judge would have changed the deadline (which he did for one class of voter) the Dems would been out of luck if all of the people who they sent Ballot Cure Affidavits to would have thrown them away because the date printed on the form had already passed.
Posted on 11/16/18 at 2:42 pm to texridder
quote:
I assume
Didn't your mother ever teach you to never arse-ume? smh
quote:
If you made a statement that ignorant
What? That mail-in is ripe for fraud? Please explain how it's not. And please note that personal insults are rather juvenile & indicates you have no argument.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News