Started By
Message
locked post

Mueller withheld exculpatory evidence from court in Cohen case

Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:46 pm
Posted by YankeeBama
Milwaukee
Member since Sep 2017
4741 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:46 pm
SIAP

I haven’t seen this posted yet and thought it was a great read. I still don’t believe Cohen has anything (tapes included).


Real Clear


quote:

The nine-page charging document filed with the plea deal suggests that the special counsel is using the Moscow tower talks to connect Trump to Russia. But congressional investigators with House and Senate committees leading inquiries on the Russia question told RealClearInvestigations that it looks like Mueller withheld from the court details that would exonerate the president. They made this assessment in light of the charging document, known as a statement of “criminal information” (filed in lieu of an indictment when a defendant agrees to plead guilty); a fuller accounting of Cohen’s emails and text messages that Capitol Hill sources have seen; and the still-secret transcripts of closed-door testimony provided by a business associate of Cohen.


quote:

Page 2 of the same criminal information document holds additional exculpatory evidence for Trump, sources say. It quotes an August 2017 letter from Cohen to the Senate intelligence committee in which he states that Trump “was never in contact with anyone about this [Moscow Project] proposal other than me.” This section of Cohen’s written testimony, unlike other parts, is not disputed as false by Mueller, which sources say means prosecutors have tested its veracity through corroborating sources and found it to be accurate. Also notable, Mueller did not challenge Cohen’s statement that he “ultimately determined that the proposal was not feasible and never agreed to make a trip to Russia.”
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 1:49 pm
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:48 pm to
It's been posted and as per usual, the Progs ran from it like it has herpes.
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Mueller withheld exculpatory evidence


The ends always justify the means, let's wait and see the ends before we discuss this.

-Every Progressive
Posted by YankeeBama
Milwaukee
Member since Sep 2017
4741 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

per usual, the Progs ran from it like it has herpes.



Of course. Put this beside the USA Today article posted today and read both with a set of unbiased eyes. The USA Today piece reads like a pop culture magazine. I wish Vegas had a line on this. Trump skates.
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 1:52 pm
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23722 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:51 pm to
Once again, NO CRIME.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Once again, NO CRIME.

We haven't finished the investigation. We must allow it to continue so we can find the crimes.
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 2:01 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95747 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:01 pm to
So, same deal as with Flynn correct?

They keep covering up evidence that supports these people and they still can’t throw much harder than process charges against them.
Posted by YankeeBama
Milwaukee
Member since Sep 2017
4741 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

same deal as with Flynn correct?


Very similar. They failed to recognize Comey’s statement and findings in Flynn’s case (I believe).
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:09 pm to
Is this similar to Mueller knowingly letting 4 innocent men rot in jail to further his own career?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9904 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:11 pm to
The House should release those emails, texts, and the interview transcripts so the public can see the exculpatory evidence.
Posted by YankeeBama
Milwaukee
Member since Sep 2017
4741 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:39 pm to
It will all come out. I think we pretty much know what cards each side is holding; it’s now a matter of how they play them; with the exceptions being the amount of ammo Cohen has to share and the redacted sections of the Fisa docs.
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 2:40 pm
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14214 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:59 pm to
Paul Sperry. A Hoover Institution fellow. It might as well be from Breitbart.
Posted by YankeeBama
Milwaukee
Member since Sep 2017
4741 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Paul Sperry. A Hoover Institution fellow. It might as well be from Breitbart.


Did you read the article?
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:11 pm to
Mueller has a history of doing this.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80272 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:13 pm to
Mueller doesn’t have to disclose exculpatory evidence of Trump in an indictment of Cohen.

Jesus, people.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:16 pm to
Realclearinvestigations? Lulz. You guys make a new fake source daily
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14214 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:18 pm to
Yes I read the article. Not one source on the investigating committees named. Why is that?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Is this similar to Mueller knowingly letting 4 innocent men rot in jail to further his own career?


That ^. Two of the men died in prison because of that slimy self obsessed cork sucker. I hope he dies a prolonged, horrible death.
*spit*
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:25 pm to
I'm not sure I understand.

They withheld evidence about Trump, in a case about Cohen? Trump is part of the investigation but not a target, so why would they be exonerating him?
Posted by jimdog
columbus, ga
Member since Dec 2012
6636 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:34 pm to
After seeing how little Mueller has (short of an audio recording with Trump saying something that I can't imagine) I am of the opinion that the SC is desperate to say he has vague suspicion or a flight of fantasy to justify his case and 2 year investigation. Obviously they have squeezed and pressured Cohen to "remember or give us your best estimation". I don't think Cohen is crazy enough to say things that would get him in trouble for making false statements. So he likely is saying all this happened and he has no recordings or filed away documents.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram